Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-Revised
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective This study aims to assess the psychometric values of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-Revised (GADS-R) which measures the intensity and duration of worry, various coping and avoidance strategies to cope with worrying, and positive and negative metacognitive beliefs about worrying.Methods 114 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and 198 healthy controls were included in the study. These patients were diagnosed according to DSM-IV TR, and the primary diagnosis of the patients was generalized anxiety disorder which was confirmed via SCID I and II, subsequently. Sociodemographic form, GADS-R total and subscale scores, and Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale (GAD-7), and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) were used to assess validity, reliability and cut-off point.Results GADS-R total and subscale scores and MCQ-30, BDI, BAI, GAD-7, and PSWQ were found to be statistically higher in the patients with GAD compared to a healthy control group. GADS-R has five factors and showed relatively acceptable sensitivity and specificity for detecting anxiety disorders at a cut-off point of 1188.Conclusion The GADS-R is a valid and reliable scale that can be used in the Turkish population as an assessment tool.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to assess the psychometric values of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-Revised (GADS-R) which measures the intensity and duration of worry, various coping and avoidance strategies to cope with worrying, and positive and negative metacognitive beliefs about worrying.Methods 114 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and 198 healthy controls were included in the study. These patients were diagnosed according to DSM-IV TR, and the primary diagnosis of the patients was generalized anxiety disorder which was confirmed via SCID I and II, subsequently. Sociodemographic form, GADS-R total and subscale scores, and Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale (GAD-7), and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) were used to assess validity, reliability and cut-off point.Results GADS-R total and subscale scores and MCQ-30, BDI, BAI, GAD-7, and PSWQ were found to be statistically higher in the patients with GAD compared to a healthy control group. GADS-R has five factors and showed relatively acceptable sensitivity and specificity for detecting anxiety disorders at a cut-off point of 1188.Conclusion The GADS-R is a valid and reliable scale that can be used in the Turkish population as an assessment tool.
참고문헌 (23)
- American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM-5®)" (2013), American Psychiatric Pub
- Haller H, "The prevalence and burden of subthreshold generalized anxiety disorder : a systematic review", BMC Psychiatry, 14, pp.128~ (2014)
- Wittchen HU, "Generalized anxiety and depression in primary care: prevalence, recognition, and management", J Clin Psychiatry, 63(Suppl 8), pp.24~34 (2002)
- Wells A, "Metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder : An open trial", J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 37, pp.206~212 (2006)
- Anıl Gündüz, "Validity and Reliability of Cognitive Attentional Syndrome-1 Questionnaire", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 16(5), pp.355~362 (2019), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Normann N, "The efficacy of metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression : A meta-analytic review", Depress Anxiety, 31, pp.402~411 (2014)
- Wells A, "A pilot randomized trial of metacognitive therapy vs applied relaxation in the treatment of adults with generalized anxiety disorder", Behav Res Ther, 48, pp.429~434 (2010)
- Wells A, "Advances in metacognitive therapy", Int J Cogn Ther, 6, pp.186~201 (2013)
- Olatunji BO, "Worry and the anxiety disorders : a meta-analytic synthesis of specificity to GAD", Appl Prevent Psychol, 14, pp.1~24 (2010)
- Wells A, "Relationships between worry, obsessive–compulsive symptoms and meta-cognitive beliefs", Behav Res Ther, 36, pp.899~913 (1998)
- Boysan M, "Assessment of hierarchical factor structure, reliability and validity of penn state worry questionnaire turkish version", Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bull Clin Psychopharmacol, 18, pp.174~182 (2008)
- Hisli-Sahin N, "A study on the validity of Beck Depression Inventory", Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 6, pp.118~126 (1988)
- Tosun A, "Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the metacognition questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms", Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19, pp.67~80 (2008)
- Konkan R, "Validity and reliability study for the Turkish adaptation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7)scale", Arch Neuropsychiatry, 50, pp.53~58 (2013)
- Wells A, "Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression" (2011), Guilford Press
- Wells A, "A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire : properties of the MCQ-30", Behav Res Ther, 42, pp.385~396 (2004)
- Beck AT, "Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory", J Clin Psychol, 40, pp.1365~1367 (1984)
- Beck AT, "An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety : Psychometric properties", J Consult Clin Psychol, 56, pp.893~897 (1988)
- Ulusoy M, "Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory : Psychometric properties", J Cognit Psychother, 12, pp.163~172 (1996)
- Jordan P, "Psychometric analysis of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale(GAD-7)in primary care using modern item response theory", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0182162~ (2017)
- Meyer TJ, "Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire", Behav Res Ther, 28, pp.487~495 (1990)
- Tezbaşaran AA, "Likert tipi ölcek geliştirme kılavuzu" (1997), Turk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları
- Thompson B, "Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis" (2004), American Psychological Association