본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The effect of multi-strain probiotics as feed additives on performance, immunity, expression of nutrient transporter genes and gut morphometry in broiler chickens

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary multi-strain probiotic (MSP) (Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 + Bacillus subtillis UBBS14 + Saccharomyces boulardii Unique 28) on performance, gut morphology and expression of nutrient transporter related genes in broiler chickens. Methods: A total of 256 (4×8×8) day-old CARIBRO Vishal commercial broiler chicks of uniform body weight were randomly distributed into four treatments with 8 replicates each and having eight chicks in each replicate. Four dietary treatments were T1 (negative control-basal diet), T2 (positive control-antibiotic bacitracin methylene disalicylate at 20 mg/kg diet), T3 (MSP at 107 colony-forming unit [CFU]/g feed), and T4 (MSP at 108 CFU/g feed). Results: During 3 to 6 weeks and 0 to 6 weeks, the body weight gain increased significantly (p<0.05) in T3 and T4 groups. The feed intake significantly (p<0.05) reduced from T1 to T3 during 0 to 3 weeks and the feed conversion ratio also significantly (p<0.05) improved in T3 and T4 during 0 to 6 weeks. The humoral and cell mediated immune response and the weight of immune organs were also significantly (p<0.05) improved in T3 and T4. However, significant (p<0.05) dietary effects were observed on intestinal histo-morphometry of ileum in T3 followed by T4 and T2. At 14 d post hatch, the relative gene expression of glucose transporter (GLUT5), sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT1) and peptide transporter (PepT1) showed a significant (p<0.05) up-regulating pattern in T2, T3, and T4. Whereas, at 21 d post hatch, the gene expression of SGLT1 and PepT1 was significantly (p<0.05) downregulated in MSP supplemented treatments T3 and T4. Conclusion: The supplementation of MSP at 107 CFU/g diet showed significant effects with improved performance, immune response, gut morphology and expression of nutrient transporter genes. Thus, the MSP could be a suitable alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in chicken diets.

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary multi-strain probiotic (MSP) (Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 + Bacillus subtillis UBBS14 + Saccharomyces boulardii Unique 28) on performance, gut morphology and expression of nutrient transporter related genes in broiler chickens. Methods: A total of 256 (4×8×8) day-old CARIBRO Vishal commercial broiler chicks of uniform body weight were randomly distributed into four treatments with 8 replicates each and having eight chicks in each replicate. Four dietary treatments were T1 (negative control-basal diet), T2 (positive control-antibiotic bacitracin methylene disalicylate at 20 mg/kg diet), T3 (MSP at 107 colony-forming unit [CFU]/g feed), and T4 (MSP at 108 CFU/g feed). Results: During 3 to 6 weeks and 0 to 6 weeks, the body weight gain increased significantly (p<0.05) in T3 and T4 groups. The feed intake significantly (p<0.05) reduced from T1 to T3 during 0 to 3 weeks and the feed conversion ratio also significantly (p<0.05) improved in T3 and T4 during 0 to 6 weeks. The humoral and cell mediated immune response and the weight of immune organs were also significantly (p<0.05) improved in T3 and T4. However, significant (p<0.05) dietary effects were observed on intestinal histo-morphometry of ileum in T3 followed by T4 and T2. At 14 d post hatch, the relative gene expression of glucose transporter (GLUT5), sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT1) and peptide transporter (PepT1) showed a significant (p<0.05) up-regulating pattern in T2, T3, and T4. Whereas, at 21 d post hatch, the gene expression of SGLT1 and PepT1 was significantly (p<0.05) downregulated in MSP supplemented treatments T3 and T4. Conclusion: The supplementation of MSP at 107 CFU/g diet showed significant effects with improved performance, immune response, gut morphology and expression of nutrient transporter genes. Thus, the MSP could be a suitable alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in chicken diets.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Aalaei M, "Effect of single-and multi-strain probiotics on broiler breeder performance, immunity and intestinal toll-like receptors expression", J Appl Anim Res, 47, pp.236~242 (2019)[DOI]
  2. Griggs JP, "Alternatives to antibiotics for organic poultry production", J Appl Poult Res, 14, pp.750~756 (2005)[DOI]
  3. Mnisi CM, "Growth performance, haeatological and serum biochemical parameters and meat quality characteristics of male Japanese quails fed a Lippia javanica-based diet", S Afr J Anim Sci, 47, pp.661~671 (2017)[DOI]
  4. Lee YJ, "Purification and characterization of cellulase produced by Bacillus amyoliquefaciens DL-3 utilizing rice hull", Bioresour Technol, 99, pp.378~386 (2008)[DOI]
  5. Cox CM, "Immunomodulatory role of probiotics in poultry and potential in ovo application", Benef Microbes, 6, pp.45~52 (2015)[DOI]
  6. Ohimain EI, "The effect of probiotic and prebiotic feed supplementation on chicken health and gut microflora : a review", Int J Anim Vet Adv, 4, pp.135~143 (2012)
  7. Albazaz RI, "Microflora of digestive tract in poultry", KSU J Nat Sci, 17, pp.39~42 (2014)
  8. Zhao L, "Quantitative genetic background of the host influences gut microbiomes in chickens", Sci Rep, 3, pp.1163~ (2013)[DOI]
  9. Borda-Molina D, "Current perspectives of the chicken gastrointestinal tract and its microbiome", Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 16, pp.131~139 (2018)[DOI]
  10. Dev K, "Dietary synbiotic supplementation improves the growth performance, body antioxidant pool, serum biochemistry, meat quality, and lipid oxidative stability in broiler chickens", Anim Nutr, 6, pp.325~332 (2020)[DOI]
  11. Ashayerizadeh A, "Effects of dietary inclusion of several biological feed additives on growth response of broiler chickens", Cell Anim Biol, 5, pp.61~65 (2011)[DOI]
  12. P.B. SIEGEL, "Production and Persistence of Antibodies in Chickens to Sheep Erythrocytes. 1. Directional Selection", Poultry Science, 59(1), pp.1~5 (1980), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  13. Van Der Zijpp AJ, "The effect of genetic origin, source of antigen, and dose of antigen on the immune response of cockerels", Poult Sci, 62, pp.205~211 (1983)[DOI]
  14. Corrier DE, "Evaluation of cell-mediated, cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by an interdigital skin test", Poult Sci, 69, pp.403~408 (1990)[DOI]
  15. Cheng S, "Genetic Analysis of immunocompetence measures in a white leghorn chicken line", Poult Sci, 67, pp.989~995 (1988)[DOI]
  16. PfafflMW, "Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR", Nucleic Acids Res, 30, pp.e36~ (2002)[DOI]
  17. Awad WA, "Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens", Poult Sci, 88, pp.49~56 (2009)[DOI]
  18. Junaid N, "Production performance, immune response and carcass traits of broiler chickens fed diet incorporated with probiotics", Indian J Anim Res, 52, pp.1597~1602 (2018)[DOI]
  19. Chen KL, "Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermented feed on the enhanced growth performance of broilers", Poult Sci, 88, pp.309~315 (2009)[DOI]
  20. Molnar AK, "Effect of different concentrations of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, carcase quality, gut microflora and immune response of broiler chickens", Br Poult Sci, 52, pp.658~665 (2012)[DOI]
  21. Patterson JA, "Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production", Poult Sci, 82, pp.627~631 (2003)[DOI]
  22. Lin HC, "Oral probiotics prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight preterm infants : a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial", Pediatrics, 122, pp.693~700 (2008)[DOI]
  23. Lee JH, "The production of surfactin during the fermentation of cheonggukjang by potential probiotic Bacillus subtilis CSY191 and the resultant growth suppression of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells", Food Chem, 131, pp.1347~1354 (2012)[DOI]
  24. Yurong Y, "Effect of probiotics on intestinal mucosal immunity and ultrastructure of cecal tonsils of chickens", Arch Anim Nutr, 59, pp.237~246 (2005)[DOI]
  25. Atela JA, "A multi-strain probiotic administered via drinking water enhances feed conversion efficiency and meat quality traits in indigenous chickens", Anim Nutr, 5, pp.179~184 (2019)[DOI]
  26. Dhama K, "Applications of probiotics in poultry : Enhancing immunity and beneficial effects on production performances and health-a review", J Immunol Immunopathol, 13, pp.1~19 (2011)
  27. Paryad A, "Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)on performance, blood constituents and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks", Afr J Agric Res, 3, pp.835~842 (2008)[DOI]
  28. Moreira J, "Effect of probiotic use on carcass performance and yield in broilers", XXXVIII annual meeting of the SBZ, pp.852~854 (2001)
  29. Vargas Jr JG, "Characteristics of cut chicken carcass, subjected to rations containing probiotics, prebiotics and antib", XXXIX annual meeting of the SBZ (2002)
  30. Mokhtari R, "The effects of different growth promoters on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens", J Vet Med Anim Health, 7, pp.271~277 (2015)[DOI]
  31. ERL Pelicano, "Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality", Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 5(3), pp.207~214 (2003), FapUNIFESP (SciELO)[DOI]
  32. Karaoglu M, "The influence of dietary probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation and different slaughter age on the performance, slaughter and carcass properties of broilers", Int J Poult Sci, 4, pp.309~316 (2005)[DOI]
  33. Raceviciute-Stupeliene A, "Influence of probiotic preparation YEASTURE-W on the productivity and meat quality of broiler chickens", Biotechnol Anim Husb, 23, pp.543~550 (2007)[DOI]
  34. Hesong Wang, "Controlling of growth performance, lipid deposits and fatty acid composition of chicken meat through a probiotic, Lactobacillus johnsonii during subclinical Clostridium perfringens infection", Lipids in Health and Disease, 16(1), pp.38~ (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  35. Mohan B, "Effect of probiotic supplementation on serum", yolk cholesterol and on egg shell thickness in layers, 1995, pp.36, 799~803
  36. Jin LZ, "Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures", Poult Sci, 77, pp.1259~1265 (1998)[DOI]
  37. Wright EM, "The sodium", glucose cotransport family SLC5, 2004, pp.447, 510~518
  38. Adibi SA, "The oligopeptide transporter(PepT-1)in human intestine : biology and function", Gastroenterology, 113, pp.332~340 (1997)[DOI]
  39. Steel A, "Stoichiometry and pH dependence of the rabbit proton-dependent oligopeptide transporter PepT1", J Physiol, 498, pp.563~569 (1997)[DOI]
  40. Iji PA, "Intestinal development and body growth of broiler chicks on diets supplemented with nonstarch polysaccharides", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 89, pp.175~188 (2001)[DOI]
  41. Van der Wielen PWJJ, "Competitive exclusion of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis by Lactobacillus crispatus and Clostridium lactatifermentans in a sequencing fed-batch culture", J Appl Environ Microbiol, 68, pp.555~559 (2002)[DOI]
  42. Chiou PW, "Effect of different sources of fiber on the intestinal morphology of domestic geese", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 9, pp.539~550 (1996)[DOI]
  43. Strompfova V, "Enterococcus faecium EK13-an enterocin a-producing strain with probiotic character and its effect in piglets", Anerobe, 12, pp.242~248 (2006)[DOI]
  44. Mott CR, "Gene expression of nutrient transporters in the small intestine of chickens from lines divergently selected for high or low juvenile body weight", J Poult Sci, 87, pp.2215~2224 (2008)[DOI]
  45. J.J. Zang, "Effects of Feed Particle Size and Feed Form on Growth Performance, Nutrient Metabolizability and Intestinal Morphology in Broiler Chickens", Animal Bioscience, 22(1), pp.107~112 (2009), 아세아·태평양축산학회
  46. Tufarelli V, "Performance, gut morphology and carcass characteristics of fattening rabbits as affected by particle size of pelleted diets", Arch Anim Nutr, 64, pp.373~382 (2010)[DOI]
  47. Buwjoom T, "Histological intestinal alterations in chickens fed low protein diet", J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 94, pp.354~361 (2010)[DOI]
  48. Choct M, "Managing gut health through nutrition", Br Poult Sci, 50, pp.9~15 (2009)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

The Bacillus subtilis and Lactic Acid Bacteria Probiotics Influences Intestinal Mucin Gene Expression, Histomorphology and Growth Performance in BroilersA.A. Sadeghi, D. Qujeq, G. Rahimi, H.R. Aliakbarpour, M. Chamani아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2012 · 제25권 제9호Effects of multi-strain probiotic supplementation on intestinal microbiota, tight junctions, and inflammation in young broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica subsp. entericaBi Yu, Chi Huan Chang, Po Yun Teng, Tzu Tai Lee아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2020 · 제33권 제11호Effect of sodium butyrate on performance, immune status, microarchitecture of small intestinal mucosa and lymphoid organs in broiler chickensArbab Sikandar, Asim Aslam, Farina Khattak, Habib Rehman, Hafsa Zaneb, Muhammad Shahbaz Yousaf, Muhammad Younus, Saima Ashraf, Saima Masood아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2017 · 제30권 제5호Dietary effects of sophorolipids on nutrient bioavailability and intestinal microenvironments in broiler chickensHanbae Lee, Ki-Peum Sung, Kwang-Youn Whang, Min-Jin Kwak, Min Young Park, Young Hoon Kim한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2022 · 제64권 제6호Effects of Immune Stress on Performance Parameters, Intestinal Enzyme Activity and mRNA Expression of Intestinal Transporters in Broiler ChickensJ.H. Yao, R.Q. Yin, W.L. Li, X.J. Yang, Y.B. Wang, Y. Feng, Y. Liu아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2012 · 제25권 제5호Dietary apidaecin Api-PR19 addition enhances growth performance by regulating gut health and microbiota in broilersLiu Rui, Min Jiyang, Wang Chenxu, Wang Xinrui, Yang Xiaojun, Zhang Lixin아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2024 · 제37권 제9호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)