Evaluation of recent changes in genetic variability in Thoroughbred horses based on microsatellite markers parentage panel in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the recent changes such as allele frequencies and total probability of exclusion (PE) in Thoroughbred horses in Korea using short tandem repeat (STR) parentage panels between 2006 and 2016. Methods: The genotype was provided for 5,988 horse samples with 15 microsatellite markers (AHT4, AHT5, ASB2, ASB17, ASB23, CA425, HMS1, HMS2, HMS3, HMS6, HMS7, HTG4, HTG10, LEX3 and VHL20). Results: In our study, the observed number of alleles per locus ranged from 3 (HMS1) to 9 (ASB17) in 2006 and 4 (HMS1) to 9 (ASB2) in 2016, with a mean value of 6.28 and 6.40, respectively. Of the 15 markers, HMS2, HTG4, and CA425 loci had relatively low polymorphism information content (<0.5000) in the Thoroughbred population. Mean levels of genetic variation in 2006 and 2016 were observed heterozygosity (HO) = 0.708, and expected heterozygosity (HE) = 0.685, as well as and HO = 0.699 and HE = 0.682, respectively. The PE was calculated for each group based on the allele frequencies of 14 or 15 STRs. The 2006 survey analyzed that PE was 0.9998, but it increased to 0.9999 in 2016 after the HMS2 marker was added in 2011. The current STR panel is still a powerful tool for parentage verification that contributes to the maintenance of integrity in the Thoroughbred population. Conclusion: The current STR panel is still a powerful tool for parentage verification that contributes to the maintenance of integrity in the Thoroughbred horses. However, continuous monitoring genetic variability is necessary.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the recent changes such as allele frequencies and total probability of exclusion (PE) in Thoroughbred horses in Korea using short tandem repeat (STR) parentage panels between 2006 and 2016. Methods: The genotype was provided for 5,988 horse samples with 15 microsatellite markers (AHT4, AHT5, ASB2, ASB17, ASB23, CA425, HMS1, HMS2, HMS3, HMS6, HMS7, HTG4, HTG10, LEX3 and VHL20). Results: In our study, the observed number of alleles per locus ranged from 3 (HMS1) to 9 (ASB17) in 2006 and 4 (HMS1) to 9 (ASB2) in 2016, with a mean value of 6.28 and 6.40, respectively. Of the 15 markers, HMS2, HTG4, and CA425 loci had relatively low polymorphism information content (<0.5000) in the Thoroughbred population. Mean levels of genetic variation in 2006 and 2016 were observed heterozygosity (HO) = 0.708, and expected heterozygosity (HE) = 0.685, as well as and HO = 0.699 and HE = 0.682, respectively. The PE was calculated for each group based on the allele frequencies of 14 or 15 STRs. The 2006 survey analyzed that PE was 0.9998, but it increased to 0.9999 in 2016 after the HMS2 marker was added in 2011. The current STR panel is still a powerful tool for parentage verification that contributes to the maintenance of integrity in the Thoroughbred population. Conclusion: The current STR panel is still a powerful tool for parentage verification that contributes to the maintenance of integrity in the Thoroughbred horses. However, continuous monitoring genetic variability is necessary.
참고문헌 (18)
- Gaffney B, "Estimation of genetic trend in racing performance of thoroughbred horses", Nature, 332, pp.722~724 (1988)[DOI]
- Gil-jae Cho, "Parentage testing of Thoroughbred horse in Korea using microsatellite DNA typing", Journal of Veterinary Science, 7(1), pp.63~67 (2006), 대한수의학회
- Ellegren H, "Cloning of highly polymorphic microsatellites in the horse", Anim Genet, 23, pp.133~142 (1992)[DOI]
- Marklund S, "Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic horse microsatellites", Anim Genet, 25, pp.19~23 (1994)[DOI]
- Changchun Li, "Evaluation of the Genetic Relationship among Ten Chinese Indigenous Pig Breeds with Twenty-six Microsatellite Markers", Animal Bioscience, 17(4), pp.441~444 (2004), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- J. H. Zhang, "Correlations of Genic Heterozygosity and Variances with Heterosis in a Pig Population Revealed by Microsatellite DNA Marke", Animal Bioscience, 18(5), pp.620~625 (2005), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- Bowling AT, "Validation of microsatellite markers for routine horse parentage testing", Anim Genet, 28, pp.247~252 (1997)[DOI]
- Tozaki T, "Population study and validation of paternity testing for Thoroughbred horses by 15 microsatellite loci", J Vet Med Sci, 63, pp.1191~1197 (2001)[DOI]
- Kim Su Min, "Assessment of genetic diversity using microsatellite markers to compare donkeys (Equus asinus) with horses (Equus caballus)", Animal Bioscience, 34(9), pp.1460~1465 (2021), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Dimsoski P, "Development of a 17-plex microsatellite polymerase chain reaction kit for genotyping horses", Croat Med J, 44, pp.322~335 (2003)
- Kalinowski ST, "Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment", Mol Ecol, 16, pp.1099~1106 (2007)[DOI]
- Tozaki T, "Microsatellite variation in Japanese and Asian horses and their phylogenetic relationship using a European horse outgroup", J Hered, 94, pp.374~380 (2003)[DOI]
- Kang BT, "Microsatellite loci analysis for the genetic variability and the parentage test of five dog breeds in South Korea", Genes Genet Syst, 84, pp.245~251 (2009)[DOI]
- Gil-JaeCho, "Genetic Diversity and Validation of Microsatellite Markers for Jeju Native Horse Parentage Testing", Genes & Genomics, 24(4), pp.5~365 (2002), 한국유전학회
- Kim TH, "Genetic structure of pig breeds from Korea and China using microsatellite loci analysis", J Anim Sci, 83, pp.2255~2263 (2005)[DOI]
- G. J. Cho, "Microsatellite DNA Typing Using 16 Markers for Parentage Verification of the Korean Native Horse", Animal Bioscience, 17(6), pp.750~754 (2004), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- W. Sun, "Genetic Differentiation between Sheep and Goats Based on Microsatellite DNA", Animal Bioscience, 17(5), pp.583~587 (2004), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- Du-Hak Yoon, "Establishment of an Individual Identification System Based on Microsatellite Polymorphisms in Korean Cattle (Hanwoo)", Animal Bioscience, 18(6), pp.762~766 (2005), 아세아·태평양축산학회