Water-soluble microencapsulation using gum Arabic and skim milk enhances viability and efficacy of Pediococcus acidilactici probiotic strains for application in broiler chickens
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a water-soluble microencapsulation method for probiotic strains using gum Arabic (GA) and skim milk (SKM) over a three-month storage period following processing.Methods: Four strains of Pediococcus acidilactici (BYF26, BYF20, BF9, and BF14) that were typical lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from the chicken gut were mixed with different ratios of GA and SKM as coating agents before spray drying at an inlet temperature 140°C. After processing, the survivability and probiotic qualities of the strains were assessed from two weeks to three months of storage at varied temperatures, and de-encapsulation was performed to confirm the soluble properties. Finally, the antibacterial activity of the probiotics was assessed under simulated gastrointestinal conditions.Results: As shown by scanning electron microscopy, spray-drying produced a spherical, white-yellow powder. The encapsulation efficacy (percent) was greatest for a coating containing a combination of 30% gum Arabic: 30% skim milk (w/v) (GA:SKM30) compared to lower concentrations of the two ingredients (p<0.05). Coating with GA:SKM30 (w/v) significantly enhanced (p<0.05) BYF26 survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions (pH 2.5 to 3) and maintained higher survival rates compared to non-encapsulated cells under an artificial intestinal juices condition of pH 6. De-encapsulation tests indicated that the encapsulated powder dissolved in water while keeping viable cell counts within the effective range of 106 for 6 hours. In addition, following three months storage at 4°C, microencapsulation of BYF26 in GA:SKM30 maintained both the number of viable cells (p<0.05) and the preparation’s antibacterial efficacy against pathogenic bacteria, specifically strains of Salmonella.Conclusion: Our prototype water-soluble probiotic microencapsulation GA:SKM30 effectively maintains LAB characteristics and survival rates, demonstrating its potential for use in preserving probiotic strains that can be used in chickens and potentially in other livestock.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a water-soluble microencapsulation method for probiotic strains using gum Arabic (GA) and skim milk (SKM) over a three-month storage period following processing. Methods: Four strains of Pediococcus acidilactici (BYF26, BYF20, BF9, and BF14) that were typical lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from the chicken gut were mixed with different ratios of GA and SKM as coating agents before spray drying at an inlet temperature 140°C. After processing, the survivability and probiotic qualities of the strains were assessed from two weeks to three months of storage at varied temperatures, and de-encapsulation was performed to confirm the soluble properties. Finally, the antibacterial activity of the probiotics was assessed under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Results: As shown by scanning electron microscopy, spray-drying produced a spherical, white-yellow powder. The encapsulation efficacy (percent) was greatest for a coating containing a combination of 30% gum Arabic: 30% skim milk (w/v) (GA:SKM30) compared to lower concentrations of the two ingredients (p<0.05). Coating with GA:SKM30 (w/v) significantly enhanced (p<0.05) BYF26 survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions (pH 2.5 to 3) and maintained higher survival rates compared to non-encapsulated cells under an artificial intestinal juices condition of pH 6. De-encapsulation tests indicated that the encapsulated powder dissolved in water while keeping viable cell counts within the effective range of 106 for 6 hours. In addition, following three months storage at 4°C, microencapsulation of BYF26 in GA:SKM30 maintained both the number of viable cells (p<0.05) and the preparation’s antibacterial efficacy against pathogenic bacteria, specifically strains of Salmonella. Conclusion: Our prototype water-soluble probiotic microencapsulation GA:SKM30 effectively maintains LAB characteristics and survival rates, demonstrating its potential for use in preserving probiotic strains that can be used in chickens and potentially in other livestock.
참고문헌 (43)
- Antunes Pc, "Incidence of Salmonella from poultry products and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents", Int J Food Microbiol, 82, pp.97~103 (2003)[DOI]
- Hill C, "Expert consensus document : the international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic", Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11, pp.506~514 (2014)[DOI]
- Mountzouris KC, "Effects of a multi-species probiotic on biomarkers of competitive exclusion efficacy in broilers challenged with Salmonella enteritidis", Br Poult Sci, 50, pp.467~478 (2009)[DOI]
- Villagrán-de la Mora Z, "Effect of a synbiotic mix on intestinal structural changes, and Salmonella Typhimurium and Clostridium perfringens colonization in broiler chickens", Animals(Basel), 9, pp.777~ (2019)[DOI]
- Attia YA, "Alternative to antibiotic growth promoters : beneficial effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and", or Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on the growth performance and sustainability of broilers’production, 2023, pp.10, 1259426~
- McClements DJ, "Nanoparticle- and microparticle-based delivery systems: encapsulation, protection and release of active compounds" (2014), CRC press
- Frakolaki G, "Novel encapsulation approach for Bifidobacterium subsp. lactis(BB-12)viability enhancement through its incorporation into a double emulsion prior to the extrusion process", LWT, 130, pp.109671~ (2020)[DOI]
- Rajam R, "Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum(MTCC 5422)with fructooligosaccharide as wall material by spray drying", LWT-Food Sci Technol, 60, pp.773~780 (2015)[DOI]
- Archacka M, "Method of preservation and type of protective agent strongly influence probiotic properties of Lactococcus lactis : A complete process of probiotic preparation manufacture and use", Food Chem, 274, pp.733~742 (2019)[DOI]
- Saeed F, "Nanotechnology and nanomaterial applications in food, health, and biomedical sciences", pp.233~247 (2019), Apple Academic Press
- Timilsena YP, "Encapsulation in the food industry : a brief historical overview to recent developments", Food Nutr Sci, 11, pp.481~508 (2020)[DOI]
- Kailasapathy K, "Microencapsulation of probiotic bacteria : technology and potential applications", Curr Issues Intest Microbiol, 3, pp.39~48 (2002)
- Lee SH, "Influence of Pediococcus-based probiotic on coccidiosis in broiler chickens", Poult Sci, 86, pp.63~66 (2007)[DOI]
- Khurajog B, "Selection and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria from chicken feces in Thailand as potential probiotics", PeerJ, 11, pp.e16637~ (2023)[DOI]
- Tao T, "Influence of polysaccharide as co-encapsulant on powder characteristics, survival and viability of microencapsulated Lactobacillus paracasei Lpc-37 by spray drying", J Food Eng, 252, pp.10~17 (2019)[DOI]
- Gul O, "Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus casei Shirota by spray drying using different combinations of wall materials and application for probiotic dairy dessert", J Food Process Preserv, 41, pp.e13198~ (2017)[DOI]
- Pupa P, "The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria", Sci Rep, 11, pp.13753~ (2021)[DOI]
- Corcoran BM, "Comparative survival of probiotic lactobacilli spray-dried in the presence of prebiotic substances", J Appl Microbiol, 96, pp.1024~1039 (2004)[DOI]
- Zaeim D, "Electrospray-assisted drying of live probiotics in acacia gum microparticles matrix", Carbohydr Polym, 183, pp.183~191 (2018)[DOI]
- Rajam R, "Encapsulation of probiotics : past, present and future", Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci, 11, pp.46~ (2022)[DOI]
- Fritzen-Freire CB, "Microencapsulation of bifidobacteria by spray drying in the presence of prebiotics", Food Res Int, 45, pp.306~312 (2012)[DOI]
- Eckert C, "Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 8014 through spray drying and using dairy whey as wall materials", LWT-Food Sci Technol, 82, pp.176~183 (2017)[DOI]
- Lone A, "Dual inhibition of Salmonella enterica and Clostridium perfringens by new probiotic candidates isolated from chicken intestinal mucosa", Microorganisms, 9, pp.166~ (2021)[DOI]
- Miri S, "A two bacteriocinogenic Ligilactobacillus strain association inhibits growth, adhesion, and invasion of Salmonella in a simulated chicken gut environment", Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins (2023)[DOI]
- Liu H, "Incorporation of polysaccharides into sodium caseinate-low melting point fat microparticles improves probiotic bacterial survival during simulated gastrointestinal digestion and storage", Food Hydrocoll, 54, pp.328~337 (2016)[DOI]
- Zhao Y, "Adsorption of Lactobacillus acidophilus on attapulgite : kinetics and thermodynamics and survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions", LWT, 78, pp.189~197 (2017)[DOI]
- Ayala DI, "A systematic approach to identify and characterize the effectiveness and safety of novel probiotic strains to control foodborne pathogens", Front Microbiol, 10, pp.1108~ (2019)[DOI]
- Sirichokchatchawan W, "Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria from fecal samples of indigenous and commercial pigs", Wetchasan Sattawaphaet, 47, pp.329~338 (2017)[DOI]
- Reddy KBPK, "Comparative survival and evaluation of functional probiotic properties of spray-dried lactic acid bacteria", Int J Dairy Technol, 62, pp.240~248 (2009)[DOI]
- Desmond C, "Improved survival of Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 in spray-dried powders containing gum acacia", J Appl Microbiol, 93, pp.1003~1011 (2002)[DOI]
- Gardiner G, "Comparative survival rates of human-derived probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and L. salivarius strains during heat treatment and spray drying", Appl Environ Microbiol, 66, pp.2605~2612 (2000)[DOI]
- Fang Z, "Encapsulation of polyphenols–a review", Trends Food Sci Technol, 21, pp.510~523 (2010)[DOI]
- Rodríguez-Restrepo YA, "Solubility as a fundamental variable in the characterization of wall material by spray drying of food components : application to microencapsulation of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis", J Food Process Eng, 40, pp.e12557~ (2017)[DOI]
- Udabage P, "Modified water solubility of milk protein concentrate powders through the application of static high pressure treatment", J Dairy Res, 79, pp.76~83 (2012)[DOI]
- Palamidi I, "Probiotic form effects on growth performance, digestive function, and immune related biomarkers in broilers", Poult Sci, 95, pp.1598~1608 (2016)[DOI]
- Barajas-Álvarez P, "Recent advances in probiotic encapsulation to improve viability under storage and gastrointestinal conditions and their impact on functional food formulation", Food Rev Int, 39, pp.992~1013 (2023)[DOI]
- Torp AM, "Optimizing oral delivery of next generation probiotics", Trends Food Sci Technol, 119, pp.101~109 (2022)[DOI]
- Oliveira AC, "Stability of microencapsulated B. lactis(BI 01)and L. acidophilus(LAC 4)by complex coacervation followed by spray drying", J Microencapsul, 24, pp.685~693 (2007)[DOI]
- Broeckx G, "Enhancing the viability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG after spray drying and during storage", Int J Pharm, 534, pp.35~41 (2017)[DOI]
- Leylak C, "Optimisation of spray drying parameters for Lactobacillus acidophilus encapsulation in whey and gum Arabic : its application in yoghurt", Int Dairy J, 112, pp.104865~ (2021)[DOI]
- Servin AL, "Adhesion of probiotic strains to the intestinal mucosa and interaction with pathogens", Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 17, pp.741~754 (2003)[DOI]
- Seo HJ, "Inhibitory effect of bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus acidilactici on the biofilm formation of Salmonella Typhimurium", Food Control, 117, pp.107361~ (2020)[DOI]
- Navidshad B, "Correlation coefficients between different methods of expressing bacterial quantification using real time PCR", Int J Mol Sci, 13, pp.2119~2132 (2012)[DOI]
