본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학기술시대의 책임윤리를 찾아서: 한스 요나스의 『책임의 원칙』을 중심으로

Searching for Responsibility Ethics in Science and Technology Era: Focusing on Hans Jonas's Das Prinzip Veranwortung

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper deals with metaphysical aspects of responsibility focusing on Hans Jonas's Das Prinzip Veranwortung as an attempt to further the discussion on the responsibility of scientists and engineers. After the examination on the necessity of new ethics reflecting the characteristics of contemporary science and technology, the philosophical foundation and major themes of Jonas's future-oriented ethics, i.e. responsibility ethics are analysed. Jonas argued new ethics should consider man and nature simultaneously based on the unification of being and what should be, and presented collectivity, continuity, and future-orientation as a basis of responsibility ethics. In conclusion, this paper suggests implications of Jonas's argument for science and technology ethics such as sustainability, precautionary principle, and responsibility of creator.

Abstract

This paper deals with metaphysical aspects of responsibility focusing on Hans Jonas's Das Prinzip Veranwortung as an attempt to further the discussion on the responsibility of scientists and engineers. After the examination on the necessity of new ethics reflecting the characteristics of contemporary science and technology, the philosophical foundation and major themes of Jonas's future-oriented ethics, i.e. responsibility ethics are analysed. Jonas argued new ethics should consider man and nature simultaneously based on the unification of being and what should be, and presented collectivity, continuity, and future-orientation as a basis of responsibility ethics. In conclusion, this paper suggests implications of Jonas's argument for science and technology ethics such as sustainability, precautionary principle, and responsibility of creator.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 金鍾國, "責任과 自律 : 요나스의 비판에 대한 칸트의 응답을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1997
  2. 김환석, "과학사회학의 쟁점들" (2006), 문학과지성사
  3. 변순용, "책임의 윤리학" (2007), 철학과 현실사
  4. 손화철, "과학기술인의 사회적 책임, In 이공계 학생을 위한 과학기술의 철학적 이해" (2008), 한양대학교출판부
  5. 손화철, "공학윤리와 전문직 교육 - 미시적 접근에서 거시적 접근으로", 철학, (91), pp.305~331 (2007), 한국철학회
  6. 송성수, "과학기술자의 사회적 책임에 관한 논의의 재검토", 공학교육연구, 11(2), pp.5~14 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
  7. 양해림, "생명공학시대의 인간복제는 새로운 책임윤리를 요청하는가?", 동서철학연구, (27), pp.167~186 (2003), 한국동서철학회
  8. 이장규, "과학기술자의 인권과 사회적 책임", pp.173~199 (2001), 과학기술과 인권, 당대
  9. 홍성욱, "과학은 얼마나 가치중립적인가, In 과학은 얼마나", pp.105~141 (2004), 서울대학교출판부
  10. Ho, Mae-Wan, "새로운 과 학윤리를 찾아서", 녹색평론, 55, pp.131~151 (2000)
  11. Hösle, V., "Ontologie und Ethik bei Hans Jonas, In Ethik für die Zukunft: Im Diskurs mit Hans Jonas", pp.105~125 (1994), Beck Verlag
  12. Johnson, D. G., "STS and Ethics: Implications for Engineering Ethics, In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies", pp.567~582 (2008), MIT Press
  13. Jonas, H., "책임의 원칙: 기술시대의 생태학적 윤리" (1994), 서광사
  14. Jonas, H., "기술 의학 윤리: 책임원칙의 실천" (2005), 솔
  15. Schmidt, J., "Die Aktualität der Ethik von Hans Jonas: Eine Kritik der Kritik des Prinzips Verantwortung", Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 55(4), pp.545~569 (2007)
  16. Song, Ahn-Jung, "Organismustheorie im ethischen Diskurs: Eine Untersuchung zur Philosophie des Lebens bei Hans Jonas", 박사, pp.2000
  17. Strydom, P., "The Civilisation of the Gene: Biotechnological Risk Framed in the Responsibility Discourse, In Nature, Risk and Responsibility: Discourse of Biotechnology", pp.21~36 (1999), Macmillan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)