통섭교육으로서 공학소양교육의 위상과 과제
The Place and Problems of Liberal Education for Engineers as Consilience Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the academic basis, current status, and future directions of liberal education for engineers as consilience education. After paying attention to the lists of liberal education for engineers including history of technology, technology and society, engineering ethics, economics of technology, management of technology, and technology policy, I found the academic basis of liberal education for engineers in science and technology studies or innovation studies. And then I monitored how liberal education for engineers is managed focusing on the case of Pusan National University and introduced new attempts on liberal education for engineers in other universities in Korea. Lastly, the future directions for the development of liberal education for engineers were suggested such as the strengthening of lecturers' expertise, the reconstruction of engineering education course, and the promotion of relevant academic associations' cooperation.
Abstract
This paper examines the academic basis, current status, and future directions of liberal education for engineers as consilience education. After paying attention to the lists of liberal education for engineers including history of technology, technology and society, engineering ethics, economics of technology, management of technology, and technology policy, I found the academic basis of liberal education for engineers in science and technology studies or innovation studies. And then I monitored how liberal education for engineers is managed focusing on the case of Pusan National University and introduced new attempts on liberal education for engineers in other universities in Korea. Lastly, the future directions for the development of liberal education for engineers were suggested such as the strengthening of lecturers' expertise, the reconstruction of engineering education course, and the promotion of relevant academic associations' cooperation.
참고문헌 (25)
- 과학철학교육위원회, "이공계 학생을 위한 과학기술의 철학적 이해" (2010), 한양대학교 출판부
- 노태천, "공학소양교육의 교과목에 관하여", 공학교육, 15(3), pp.37~41 (2008)
- 배원병, "공학윤리" (2006), 북스힐
- 배원병, "이공계가 한다! 글쓰기와 발표하기" (2010), 북스힐
- 손화철, "공학윤리와 기술철학: 그 접점을 찾아서", 공학교육연구, 13(6), pp.122~131 (2010), 한국공학교육학회
- 송성수, "윌슨의 통섭은 ‘두 문화’의 간격을 메울 수 있는가?", 철학논총, 56(2), pp.25~42 (2009), 새한철학회
- 송위진, "기술혁신과 과학기술정책" (2006), 르네상스
- 유영제, "공학소양교육의 필요성과 방향" (2003), 한국공학교육기술학회
- 윤대희, "공학 에세이", 한국공학교육학회 (2010)
- 이장규, "공학기술과 사회: 21세기 엔지니어를위한 기술사회론 입문" (2006), 지호
- 이희원, "공과대학 교양교육 개선 방안 탐구 : 서울대학교 사례를 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 11(3), pp.22~30 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
- 정선양, "기술과 경영" (2006), 경문사
- 한경희, "공학 윤리 교육: 현황과 쟁점, 그리고 전략", 공학교육연구, 12(1), pp.31~41 (2009), 한국공학교육학회
- 김병재, "공학기술과 인간사회" (2005), 지호출판사
- 한국과학기술학회, , 2011년도 한국과학기술학회 전기 학술대회 자료집 (2011)
- 홍성욱, "21세기 한국의 자연과학과 인문학, In 지식의 통섭: 학문의 경계를 넘다", pp.273~298 (2007), 이음
- Dodgson, M., "The Handbook of Industrial Innovation" (1994), Edward Elgar
- Dosi, G., "Technical Change and Economic Theory" (1988), Pinter Publishers
- Fagerberg, J., "The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Hackett, E. J., "The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies" (2008), MIT Press
- Harris, C. E., "공학윤리" (2006), (주) 북스힐
- Jasanoff, S., "Handbook of Science and Technology Studies" (1995), Sage Publications
- 주우석, "2020 엔지니어교육: 미래 공학교육에 대한 비전" (2009), 시그마프레스
- Spiegel-Rösing, I., "Science, Technology and Society: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective" (1977), Sage Publications
- Wilson, E. O., "통섭: 지식의 대통합" (2005), 사이언스북스