노인운동지도자의 정량적 평가를 위한 척도 개발
Development of a Scale for Quantitative Evaluation of Exercise Instructors for Older People
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to quantitatively evaluate the exercise instructor’s teaching ability and to verify its validity and reliability. METHODS: The participants were 331 students enrolled in the college of physical education. The survey was conducted using Google Forms. The questionnaire contained 36 questions, comprising seven questions on professionalism; eight on emotional communication ability; nine on fidelity; and, twelve on safety. A 5-point Likert scale was used. Factor analysis was performed, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the validity and reliability analyses of the research tool; additionally, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. All data were analyzed using the STATA 17.0 statistical program. RESULTS: In the exercise instructor for older people evaluation questionnaire developed in this study, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.8 (0.88-0.93) for all factors, demonstrating its validity for factors including professionalism, emotional communication ability, fidelity, and safety. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.9031, indicating high reliability. A strong correlation exists between factors, and through regression analysis, age (.1874, p=.027), professionalism (.8049, p=.000), fidelity (.6009, p=.000). The adequacy of the evaluation questionnaire (1.8606, p=.000) had a statistically significant effect on safety. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire can be used as a tool to improve the quality of the exercise instructors for older people and serve to recognize the appropriate instructional methods for prospective exercise instructors for older people.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to quantitatively evaluate the exercise instructor’s teaching ability and to verify its validity and reliability. METHODS: The participants were 331 students enrolled in the college of physical education. The survey was conducted using Google Forms. The questionnaire contained 36 questions, comprising seven questions on professionalism; eight on emotional communication ability; nine on fidelity; and, twelve on safety. A 5-point Likert scale was used. Factor analysis was performed, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the validity and reliability analyses of the research tool; additionally, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. All data were analyzed using the STATA 17.0 statistical program. RESULTS: In the exercise instructor for older people evaluation questionnaire developed in this study, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.8 (0.88-0.93) for all factors, demonstrating its validity for factors including professionalism, emotional communication ability, fidelity, and safety. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.9031, indicating high reliability. A strong correlation exists between factors, and through regression analysis, age (.1874, p=.027), professionalism (.8049, p=.000), fidelity (.6009, p=.000). The adequacy of the evaluation questionnaire (1.8606, p=.000) had a statistically significant effect on safety. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire can be used as a tool to improve the quality of the exercise instructors for older people and serve to recognize the appropriate instructional methods for prospective exercise instructors for older people.
참고문헌 (24)
- Statistics Korea, "2022 senior citizen total rate" (2022), National Statistical Office
- 김선희, "노인체육 프로그램의 성공적 실천을 위한 노인체육지도자의 역할과 자질", 한국사회체육학회지, (35), pp.661~676 (2009), 한국사회체육학회
- Carron AV, "Social influence and exercise : a meta-analysis", J Sport Exerc Psychol, 18, pp.1~16 (1996)[DOI]
- Carron AV, "Team building in an exercise setting", Sport Psychol, 7, pp.8~18 (1993)
- de Lacy-Vawdon CJ, "Facilitators of attendance and adherence to group-based physical activity for older adults : a literature synthesis", J Aging Phys Act, 26(1), pp.155~167 (2018)[DOI]
- 김흥태, "지속가능한 노인여가정책에 관한 연구", 한국사회체육학회지, (22), pp.221~237 (2004), 한국사회체육학회
- Choi HN, "A study on the seniors’ perception on the roles of senior sports instructors", pp.2022
- Harvey K, "Exercise instructors for older adult fitness: a review of the literature", Can J Aging, 39(3), pp.373~384 (2020)[DOI]
- Oldridge NB, "What to look for in an exercise class leader", Phys Sportsmed, 5(4), pp.85~88 (1977)[DOI]
- "Guide to the qualification examination system"[URL]
- 김수연, "노인스포츠지도사의 역할모호성, 직무소진 및 이직의도의 관계", 한국여성체육학회지, 33(2), pp.19~36 (2019), 한국여성체육학회[DOI]
- 추나영, "노인스포츠지도사 자격 취득의 실효성 및개선 방안: 전라남도를 중심으로", 한국응용과학기술학회지, 37(4), pp.711~722 (2020), 한국응용과학기술학회
- 배재윤, "노인스포츠지도자 자격증 취득 목적과 직업 인식, 직업적 안정화 방안에 관한 질적 사례연구", 한국스포츠사회학회지, 28(4), pp.67~95 (2015), 한국스포츠사회학회[DOI]
- 이호훈, "엑티브 에이징 실현을 위한 노인스포츠지도사의 지도역량 우선순위 분석", 한국스포츠학회, 15(1), pp.347~357 (2017), 한국스포츠학회
- 강현욱, "DACUM 기법의 직무분석을 이용한 노인스포츠지도자의 직무규명 분석", 한국체육학회지, 56(5), pp.253~266 (2017), 한국체육학회
- Ryan JL, "Motor learning strategies rating instrument instruction manual" (2016), Bloorview Research Institute
- 서수진, "필라테스지도자의 전문성 척도개발", 한국체육학회지, 57(5), pp.351~362 (2018), 한국체육학회
- American College of Sports Medicine(ACSM), "ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription" (2022), Wolters Kluwer
- 최미영, "엘리트 댄스스포츠 지도자와 선수의 상호작용 형성 과정", 한국무용과학회지, 32(1), pp.91~106 (2015), 한국무용과학회[DOI]
- 강현철, "구성타당도 평가에 있어서 요인분석의 활용", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), pp.587~594 (2013), 한국간호과학회
- Kaiser HF, "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39, pp.31~36 (1974)[DOI]
- 엄한주, "체육학연구에서 요인분석모형의 적용 및 오용에 관한 현황분석", 한국체육학회지, 47(2), pp.1~16 (2008), 한국체육학회
- Oh S, "Introduction to objectivity and its usage", Korean Society for Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science, 4(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
- Van Noman KA, "Exercise programming for older adults" (1995), Human Kinetics