지역아동센터 교사의 역할인식에 관한 연구
Recognizing The Role of Teacher at Local Children's Center
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze directors and front-line welfare workers’ role of recognition in community child centers. The result of the study is as follows. First, directors and front-line welfare workers in community child centers played a wide variety of parts,such as general works, outside duties, program planning, instruction of learning, routine daily-life guidance,counseling, and accounting, and the roles were often mixed. Directors and front-line welfare workers’ role has to be separated, and a professional role has to be conducted by receiving an expert’s help. Second, the qualification and career of directors and front-line welfare workersin community child centers were concentrated in social workers and child care teachers, and the qualification and career were often out of line with their actual work duty. Most of the students in community child centers are elementary and secondary school students. Few directors and front-line welfare workers have a certification related to teaching elementary and secondary school students, and the basic and continuing educations are also not enough. Actually, teachers feel inadequate when they understand and consult, or teach children and youths. The educational program for teachers in community child centers, such as establishing their identity and educational philosophy, understanding children and youths, and liaison betweenschools and their local community and them, has to be supplemented. Directors and front-line welfare workersin community child centers must have a certification related to adolescent education, such as youth specialist, youth counselor,and lifelong educationist. Third, most of teachers in community child centers give weight to the roles related to welfare. They first take care of youths, and are bothered about instruction of learningand routine daily-life guidance. In addition to the role, the approach of life long education to citizens they want to educate is more neede
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze directors and front-line welfare workers’ role of recognition in community child centers. The result of the study is as follows. First, directors and front-line welfare workers in community child centers played a wide variety of parts,such as general works, outside duties, program planning, instruction of learning, routine daily-life guidance,counseling, and accounting, and the roles were often mixed. Directors and front-line welfare workers’ role has to be separated, and a professional role has to be conducted by receiving an expert’s help. Second, the qualification and career of directors and front-line welfare workersin community child centers were concentrated in social workers and child care teachers, and the qualification and career were often out of line with their actual work duty. Most of the students in community child centers are elementary and secondary school students. Few directors and front-line welfare workers have a certification related to teaching elementary and secondary school students, and the basic and continuing educations are also not enough. Actually, teachers feel inadequate when they understand and consult, or teach children and youths. The educational program for teachers in community child centers, such as establishing their identity and educational philosophy, understanding children and youths, and liaison betweenschools and their local community and them, has to be supplemented. Directors and front-line welfare workersin community child centers must have a certification related to adolescent education, such as youth specialist, youth counselor,and lifelong educationist. Third, most of teachers in community child centers give weight to the roles related to welfare. They first take care of youths, and are bothered about instruction of learningand routine daily-life guidance. In addition to the role, the approach of life long education to citizens they want to educate is more neede
참고문헌 (30)
- 강명순, "지역아동센터 청소년 지원 확대와 청 소년 전용 지역아동센터 육성을 위한 정책제안서", ~ (2008)
- 강이석, "지역아동센터 교사들의 직무환경과 조직 헌신도가 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2008
- 공창숙, "지역아동센터 운영평가 및 발전방안에 관한 연구 : 경기도 지역을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2008
- 김성제, "청소년 전용 지역아동센터 이용이 학교 적응유연성에 미치는 영향 : 1318 Happy Zone 중 심으로", 석사, pp.2009
- 김소영, "지역아동센터 이용아동을 위한 사회성 향상 집단미술치료 프로그램 개발 및 효과검증", 박사, pp.2009
- 김정옥, "결손가정아동의 자아존중감과 스트레스 와의 관계 연구:지역아동센터 초등학생을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2006
- 김준기, "한국의 사회조직간의 네트워크에 대한 연구:지역아동센터 네트워크 분석을 중심으로", 행정논총, 45(4), pp.75~105 (2007), 한국행정연구소
- 보건복지가족부, "2009년도 아동․청소년사업 안내", 보건복지가족부, ~ (2009)
- 2009년 전국지역아동센터 평가결과 보고서, "보건복지가족부", 보건 복지부·지역아동센터 평가사업 지원단, ~ (2009)
- 보건복지부, "지역아동센터 운영지침", 보건복지부 아동권리과, ~ (2011)
- 전국지역아 동센터 실태조사 보고서, "보건복지부", 보건복지부·지역아동센터 중앙지원단, 38~44 (2010)
- 2010 년 전국지역아동센터 평가결과 보고서, "보건복지부", 보건복지부·지역아동센터 평가사업 지원단, 65~66 (2010)
- 성미영, "지역아동센터 생활복지사의 직무만족도 및 조직헌신도 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 신경림, "질적연구방법론" (2005), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 이경림, "빈곤가족아동의 사회적 지지가 아동역량 에 미치는 영향 : 지역아동센터 이용 아동의 가족 유형별 차이를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2007
- 지역아동센터 전국 실태조사, "이태수", 아동복지교사중앙지원센터․보건복지가족부, ~ (2008)
- 이현주, "지역아동센터 아동의 실태 및 교육환경 만족도 조사", 석사, pp.2007
- 이혜경, "지역아동센터 아동의 사회적 지지 및 임파워먼트와 심리사회적 적응", 박사, pp.2007
- 지역아동센터 운영모델 개발연구, "정익중", 아동복지교사중앙지원센터, ~ (2008)
- 정익중, "아동청소년 방과후 서비스의 현황과 과제", 공동체, ~ (2009)
- 정익중, "지역아동센터 종사자 소진이 아동의 심리사회적 적응에 미치는 영향", 한국아동복지학, (31), pp.205~234 (2010), 한국아동복지학회
- 조흥식, "질적 연구방법 론-다섯가지 접근-" (2010), 학지사
- 최은희, "지역아동센터에서 근무하는 생활복지사의 근무경험에 관한 현상학적 연구", 생활 과학논총, 13(2) (2009), 충북대학교 생활과학연구소
- Kyriacou,C, "Teacher stress : Directions for future research", Educational Review, 53, pp.27~35 (2001)
- Wallace, G. R., "Teacher stress and self concept", Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association (1986)
- Wessen,P.D, "Off-site stress and the disadvantaged caregiver : A neglected factor", Child Care Information Exchange, 42, pp.10~12 (1981)
- "보건복지부"[URL]
- "보건복지부위탁 지역아동센터 중앙지원단"[URL]
- "전국지 역아동센터협의회"[URL]
- "청소년자활지원관"[URL]
