공학 분야의 학문융합교육 가능성 분석
A Study on The Possibility of The Convergence Education in Engineering
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to identify on the possibility of the convergence education in engineering. Delphi survey on a panel of experts waschosen to be the main methodology for this study, drawing the main factors of convergence education in engineering. From Oct. 10to Nov. 25, 2013, a three-round Delphi survey was implemented to collect data. A panel of eighteen experts were involved in thissurvey. For statistical processing, descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were carried outalong with internal reliability test on the survey instrument. First, the possible convergence of disciplines in engineering were foundto Design, Industrial design, ICT, Health care services, Video media, Business and Administration, Organizational psychology, Sociology,Humanities and Aesthetics. Second, the convergence education factors to be most important demanded creativity, idea generation techniquessuch as the expression of thought communication skills, technical expertise in the field per line, understanding of basic knowledge,verification of common elements among different disciplines, understanding of other disciplines fusion in engineering, artistry and imagination,etc. Third, requirements for the talented person of convergence were the open mind and enthusiasm, creative imagination, accept theopinions of others, skills capacity as a creative expression, and challenges. Above-mentioned requirements are found to be the necessaryelements for convergence education.
Abstract
This study aims to identify on the possibility of the convergence education in engineering. Delphi survey on a panel of experts waschosen to be the main methodology for this study, drawing the main factors of convergence education in engineering. From Oct. 10to Nov. 25, 2013, a three-round Delphi survey was implemented to collect data. A panel of eighteen experts were involved in thissurvey. For statistical processing, descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were carried outalong with internal reliability test on the survey instrument. First, the possible convergence of disciplines in engineering were foundto Design, Industrial design, ICT, Health care services, Video media, Business and Administration, Organizational psychology, Sociology,Humanities and Aesthetics. Second, the convergence education factors to be most important demanded creativity, idea generation techniquessuch as the expression of thought communication skills, technical expertise in the field per line, understanding of basic knowledge,verification of common elements among different disciplines, understanding of other disciplines fusion in engineering, artistry and imagination,etc. Third, requirements for the talented person of convergence were the open mind and enthusiasm, creative imagination, accept theopinions of others, skills capacity as a creative expression, and challenges. Above-mentioned requirements are found to be the necessaryelements for convergence education.
참고문헌 (30)
- 강성종, "한국 특수교육에서의 학문융합 사고적 접근", 특수교육학연구, 44(4), pp.19~42 (2010), 한국특수교육학회
- 권다은, "협업디자인 과정 중 창의적 분위기에 미치는 융합디자인교육의 효과", 디자인학연구, 26(3), pp.241~262 (2013), 한국디자인학회
- 김민정, "이공계 연구중심대학의 통합형 교양교육과정에 대한 연구", 교양교육연구, 6(3), pp.357~381 (2012), 한국교양교육학회
- 김승인, "융합디자인 교육과정 개발에 관한 연구", 디지털디자인학연구, 13(2), pp.127~136 (2013), 한국디지털디자인학회
- 마정범, "직관과 구술반복을 활용한 공학교육 사례 연구", 공학교육연구, 16(4), pp.30~36 (2013), 한국공학교육학회
- 박성미, "공학․과학․미학․인문학 및 사회과학 분야간 지식융합을 위한 수렴영역 분석", 수산해양교육연구, 25(5), pp.1031~1045 (2013), 한국수산해양교육학회[DOI]
- 신동희, "스마트 융합과 통섭 3. 0" (2011), 성균관대학교출판부
- 오헌석, "융합학문 어떻게 탄생하는가?", 교육문제연구, 43(43), pp.51~82 (2012), 교육문제연구소[DOI]
- 이인식, "지식의 대융합" (2013), 고즈윈
- 이중만, "과학기술분야 융합기술 인력현황 및 이동 행태분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(5), pp.446~459 (2010), 한국콘텐츠학회
- 양미경, "집단지성의 특성 및 기제와 교육적 시사점의 탐색", 열린교육연구, 18(4), pp.1~30 (2010), 한국열린교육학회
- 정영기, "철학과 공학의 융합사례 연구: 착한공학을 중심으로", 동서철학연구, 63(3), pp.271~291 (2012), 한국동서철학회
- 조성구, "해외사례 분석을 통한 복합학제 설계교육의 활성화 방안", 공학교육연구, 11(1), pp.117~125 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
- 한병기, "공학교육에서의 디자인 및 창의적 설계교육", 공학교육연구, 9(4), pp.19~27 (2006)
- 황성철, "사회복지프로그램 개발과 평가" (2005), 공동체
- 홍성욱, "융합이란 무엇인가", pp.13~ (2012), 사이언스북스
- Besselaar, P, "Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary: Concepts and indicators", Paper for the 8th conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Sydney. Austrailia (2001)
- Bhavnani, S. H., "Team work across disciplinary Borders: A bridge between college and the work place", Journal of Engineering Education, pp.13~16 (2000)
- Bryson, J. M., "The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations:Propositions from the Literature", Public Administration Review, 66(s1), pp.44~55 (2006)
- Frodeman, R., "The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Gorman, M., "Trading zones and interactional expertise : creating new kinds of collaboration" (2010), MIT Press
- Kotani, M., "A Challenge by Mathematics-Materials Science Collaboration", Journal of the surface science society of Japan, 34(1), pp.3~8 (2013)
- Korres, K, "Supporting the development of critical thinking skills in secondary education through the use of interdisciplinary statistics' and mathematics' problems", Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(5), pp.491~507 (2010)
- Leong, B. D., "Culture-Based knowledge : Towards New Design Thinking and Practice-A Dialogue", Design Issues, 19(3), pp.48~58 (2003)
- Rotberg, R. I., "Biography and Historiography : Mutual Evidentiary and Interdisciplinary Considerations", The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 40(3), pp.305~324 (2010)
- Salas, E, "Introduction to the Special Issue: Collaboration in multicultural environments", Journal of organization behavior, 34(6), pp.735~738 (2013)
- Sanfort, J., "Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Sharon, H. P, "디자인 통합" (2009), 안그락픽스
- Teal, R., "Developing a (Non linear) Practice of Design Thinking", International Journal of ART and Design Education, 29(3), pp.294~302 (2010)
- Thomson, A. M., "Collaboration Processes:Inside the Black Box", Public Administration Review, 66(s1), pp.20~32 (2006)