공학 설계 패러다임 변화에 따른 팀 창의성의 정의 및 하위 영역과 요소 도출
A Study on the Definition of Team Creativity upon the Design Paradigm and Their Sub-domains and Element Extraction
3
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper attempts to take an in-depth study of the importance of teams and their creativity according to changes of recent design paradigm in engineering and to draw conclusions of the sub-domains and their element extraction. For this purpose, theoretical consideration was reviewed to present the definition of creativity and its sub-domains and elements. Besides, the two steps of expert validation test were conducted to extract the definition of creativity and its sub-domains and elements. The team creativity is defined as a team ability to come up with fresh and useful ideas and to lead them to get meaningful results through cooperative interactions among team members to solve problems given to them based on each member’s creativity. Totally, 4 subs -domains and 16 sub-elements were extracted to get to know their influence on the team creativity. This includes a team size, characteristics of team members, and a team structure in team organization domain. To evaluate team atmosphere, elements such as sensibility, fellowship, teamwork, reliability, autonomy and open minded feature are included. In the team activity domain, strategies for solving problems, activities for divergent thinking, activities for convergence thinking and team interaction are included. Also, the sub-domain for team management includes a task, process and conflict management.
Abstract
This paper attempts to take an in-depth study of the importance of teams and their creativity according to changes of recent design paradigm in engineering and to draw conclusions of the sub-domains and their element extraction. For this purpose, theoretical consideration was reviewed to present the definition of creativity and its sub-domains and elements. Besides, the two steps of expert validation test were conducted to extract the definition of creativity and its sub-domains and elements. The team creativity is defined as a team ability to come up with fresh and useful ideas and to lead them to get meaningful results through cooperative interactions among team members to solve problems given to them based on each member’s creativity. Totally, 4 subs -domains and 16 sub-elements were extracted to get to know their influence on the team creativity. This includes a team size, characteristics of team members, and a team structure in team organization domain. To evaluate team atmosphere, elements such as sensibility, fellowship, teamwork, reliability, autonomy and open minded feature are included. In the team activity domain, strategies for solving problems, activities for divergent thinking, activities for convergence thinking and team interaction are included. Also, the sub-domain for team management includes a task, process and conflict management.
참고문헌 (64)
- 권상순, "개인, 집단, 조직창의성 발현 및 제고를 위한 창의적 경영 시스템", 사회과학논집, 3, pp.29~57 (2000)
- 김태훈, "공학설계능력의 평가 요소 구명", 공학교육연구, 8(3), pp.49~56 (2005)
- 류형선, "집단 창의성의 효과와 영향 요인 연구", 박사, 교육심리ㆍ교육과정, pp.2010
- 백윤정, "집단갈등이 집단창의성에 미치는 영향：리더십 스타일과 커뮤니케이션의 조절효과", 지식경영연구, 9(3), pp.1~19 (2008), 한국지식경영학회
- 신승국, "팀 프로세스 특성과 팀 내부요인이 팀 창의성에 미치는 영향에 관한 고찰", 산업경영논총, 12, pp.1~12 (2006)
- 유인하, "광고 아트디렉터의 업무환경이 개인창의성과 조직창의성에 미치는 영향 연구 : 임파워먼트 매개변인을 중심으로", 광고학연구, 22(5), pp.147~172 (2011), 한국광고학회
- 이건창, "지식수준의 다양성과 네트워크 구조가 팀 창의성에 미치는 영향에 관한 종단분석 연구: 에이전트기반 모델링 기법을 중심으로", 경영학연구, 39(6), pp.1539~1557 (2010), 한국경영학회
- 이덕로, "개인창의성에 영향을 미치는 변수에 관한 연구* - 창의적 성격, 기술다양성 및 팀 특성의 상호작용효과를 중심으로 -", 인적자원관리연구, 16(3), pp.167~192 (2009), 한국인적자원관리학회
- 이종락, "광고 크리에이티브 업무환경 요소와 팀 창의성의 관계에 대한 연구", 박사, 광고홍보학과, pp.2012
- 이준호, "팀 창의성을 위한 다양성과 응집성 관리 : 변혁적 리더십의 역할", 경영교육연구, (57), pp.137~161 (2009), 한국경영교육학회
- 이준호, "연구개발팀의 다양성과 응집성이 팀 창의성에 미치는 영향: 창의적 역할모델로서 리더기능의 조절효과", 조직과 인사관리연구, 35(3), pp.171~197 (2011), 한국인사관리학회
- 이화자, "광고인의 창의적 행동 및 직무성과 영향요인 연구", 박사, 광고, pp.2002
- 한국형 팀제, "임창희", 삼성경제연구소, 151~ (1996)
- 장충석, "조직 구성원의 커뮤니케이션 만족이 인적자원의 집단 창의성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 경영과 정보연구, (21), pp.49~76 (2007), 대한경영정보학회
- 조기순, "학습복잡계 기반의 집단 창의성 발현에 관한 연구", 박사, 교육공학, pp.2009
- 崔鐘仁, "집단창의성의 결정요인에 관한 연구", 박사, 경영학, pp.1996
- 하주현, "개인과 집단의 창의성 비교와 집단의 보상 효과 연구", 창의력교육연구, 11(1), pp.89~108 (2011), 한국창의력교육학회
- Amabile, T. M., "The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), pp.357~376 (1983)
- Amabile, T. M., "A model of creativity and innovation in organizations", Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, pp.123~167 (1988)
- Amabile, T. M., "Creativity in Context" (1996), Westview Press
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Handbook of Creativity", pp.77~92 (1988), Plenum press
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Flow: The psychology of optimal experience" (1990), Harper & Row
- Damanpour, F., "Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of determinants and modeeatoes", Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp.555~590 (1991)
- Dunbar, K., "Creative thought: an investigation of conceptual strrcutures and processes", pp.461~493 (1997), American Psychological Association
- Dyer, W., "Team building: Issue and alternatives" (1997), Addition Weslery
- Eisenberg, R., "Learned industriousness", Psychological Review, 99(2), pp.248~267 (1992)
- Eisenberg, R., "Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth?", American Psychologist, 51, pp.1153~1166 (1996)
- Fisher, K., "The Distributed Mind" (1998), American. Management Association
- French, W. L., "Creative Action in Organization" (1995), SAGE Publications, Inc
- Furnham, A., "Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity", Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), pp.613~617 (2008)
- Guilford, J. P., "Creativity", American Psychologist, 5(9), pp.444~454 (1950)
- Hackman, J. R., "Leading Group in Organization, In Designing Effective Work Groups" (1986), Jossey-Bass Inc
- Harris, P., "Build a high performance team", Training & Development Journal, 40(2), pp.226~ (1986)
- Hennessey, B. A., "The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives", pp.11~38 (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Hollingworth, J. R., "Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change: A Research Handbook", pp.423~442 (2006), Oxford University Press
- Hoyt, J., "Organizational environment, changing economic conditions, and the effective supervision of technical personnel: a management challenge", Journal of High Technology Management research, 10(2), pp.275~293 (1999)
- Kanigal, R., "Apprentice to genius: The making of a scientific dynasty" (1993), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Katzenbach, J. R., "Why teams matter", Mckinsey Quarterly, 3, pp.3~27 (1992)
- Kezsborm, D., "Are you really ready to build a project team?", Industrial Engineering, 152, pp.50~55 (1990)
- Kratzaer, J., "Team polarity and creative performance in innovation teams", Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), pp.96~104 (2006)
- Kurtzberg, T. R., "From Guilford to creativity synergy: Opening the black box of teamlevel creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 13(3, 4), pp.285~294 (2001)
- Lawshe, C. H., "A quantitative approach to content validity", Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp.563~575 (1975)
- Leonard, D., "When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Group" (1999), Harvard Business School Press
- MacKinnon, D. W., "Personality and the realization of creative potential", American Psychologist, 20, pp.273~281 (1965)
- Montuori, A., "Social Creativity" (1999), Hampton Press
- Mouchiroud, C., "Social Creativity: A cross-sectional study of 6-to 11-year-old children", International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(1), pp.60~69 (2002)
- Parker, G. M., "Team Player and Teamwork" (1990), Jossey-Bass Inc
- Paulus, P. B., "Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Robbins, S. P., "Organizational behavior" (1998), Prentice Hall
- Robin, L. E., "Team Building for the future" (1996), 한언출판사
- M. C. Schilpzand, "Members' Openness to Experience and Teams' Creative Performance", Small Group Research, 42(1), pp.55~76 (2010), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Shalley, C. E., "Effects of Productivity goals, Creativity goals, and Personal discretion on individual Creativity", Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), pp.179~185 (1991)
- Shalley, C. E., "The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?", Journal of Management, 30, pp.933~958 (2004)
- Snyder, S. H., "Brainstorming: The science and politics of apiate research" (1989), Havard University Press
- Somech, A., "Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation", Journal of Management (2011)
- Stokes, C. K., "Adaptive performance: A criterion problem", Team Performance Management, 16(3, pp.4) (2010), 212~230
- Sutton, R. I., "Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm", Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), pp.685~718 (1996)
- Tagger, S., "Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multiple model", Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), pp.315~330 (2002)
- Torrance, E. P., "Climate for creativity", pp.75~96 (1972), Pergamon Press
- Varney, G. H., "Building Productive Teams" (1989), Jossey-Bass Inc
- Watson, E., "Creativity in Teams: Collaboration and Learning" (2009), LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co
- West, M. A., "Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups", Applied Psychology, 51, pp.355~424 (2002)
- Woodcock, M., "Team Development Manual" (1989), Grower
- Woodman, R. W., "Toward a theory of organizational creativity", Academy of Management Review, 18(2), pp.293~321 (1993)