공학적 공감능력 검사도구 개발 및 타당화 연구
Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Engineering Empathy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate an Engineering Empathy Instrument. Engineering empathy is defined as the ability that encompasses the following three qualities, a skill to interpret social issues and phenomenon that may occur in the process of interactions between human beings and engineering systems, a practical orientation that enables one to take stakeholders’ perspectives to carry out an engineering project, and a professional way of being that acknowledges empathic skills and associated practice orientations. Based on this notion, we develop a scale to measure engineering empathy and have surveyed 429 engineering students. Evidence for the validity and reliability of the scale is presented. In conclusion, we find that engineering empathy can be measured and conceptualized as three domains: a Learnable Skill (ELS), a Practical Orientation (EPO), and a Professional Way (EPW). We also find that sophomores show the highest level of engineering empathy as compared with other graders. While students accumulate technical knowledge, their understanding about engineering in social and interpretational contexts gets weakened. This implies that engineering education necessarily emphasizes the impacts of engineering solutions in interpersonal, societal, technologies, and environmental contexts.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate an Engineering Empathy Instrument. Engineering empathy is defined as the ability that encompasses the following three qualities, a skill to interpret social issues and phenomenon that may occur in the process of interactions between human beings and engineering systems, a practical orientation that enables one to take stakeholders’ perspectives to carry out an engineering project, and a professional way of being that acknowledges empathic skills and associated practice orientations. Based on this notion, we develop a scale to measure engineering empathy and have surveyed 429 engineering students. Evidence for the validity and reliability of the scale is presented. In conclusion, we find that engineering empathy can be measured and conceptualized as three domains: a Learnable Skill (ELS), a Practical Orientation (EPO), and a Professional Way (EPW). We also find that sophomores show the highest level of engineering empathy as compared with other graders. While students accumulate technical knowledge, their understanding about engineering in social and interpretational contexts gets weakened. This implies that engineering education necessarily emphasizes the impacts of engineering solutions in interpersonal, societal, technologies, and environmental contexts.
참고문헌 (31)
- "공학교육인증기준 2015(KEC2015)" (2015), 한국공학교육인증원[URL]
- 박민수, "공감력, 4차 산업혁명시대에 무엇을 의미하는가?", 공학교육연구, 22(1), pp.16~21 (2019), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 정진우, "공학윤리에서 엔지니어의 사회적 책임 ―실질적 교수방법", 인문학연구, 37(1), pp.251~281 (2010), 인문과학연구소
- 인지스타일로서의 공감하기-체계화하기, "인간연구", 2017, 113~142, pp.인간학연구소, http:
- 이은아, "대학생 공감능력 향상을 위한 공감교육 연구 - 이화여대 '호모 엠파티쿠스: 소통, 공감, 신뢰' 교과목 사례를 중심으로 -", 교육문화연구, 23(5), pp.149~168 (2017), 교육연구소[DOI]
- 최정아, "공과대학생의 대인관계문제, 정서인식명확성, 공감능력 탐색", 공학교육연구, 22(6), pp.64~73 (2019), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 양희선, "과학 수업에서 공감 요소의 분석: 일반적 공감 요소와의 비교를 중심으로", 현장과학교육, 14(2), pp.245~258 (2020), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
- Carroll, M., "Destination, imagination and the fires within : Design thinking in a middle school classroom", International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), pp.37~53 (2010)
- Cech, E. A., "Culture of disengagement in engineering education?", Science, Technology, and Human Values, 39(1), pp.42~72 (2014)
- Darling, K., "Robot ethics 2.0" (2017), Oxford University Press
- Darling, K., "Empathic concern and the effect of stories in human-robot interaction", presented at 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp.770~775 (2015), IEEE
- Darling, K., "Robot law" (2016), Edward Elgar Publishing
- de Waal, F. B., "The antiquity of empathy", Science, 336(6083), pp.874~876 (2012)
- The global information technology report 2015, "Dutta, S.", World Economic Forum, 80~85, pp.World Economic Forum (Vol. 1, No. 1) (2015)
- Fila, N. D., "In their shoes: Student perspectives on the connection between empathy and engineering", presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition (2016)
- Goldstein, A. P., "The use of structured learning for empathy enhancement in paraprofessional psychotherapist training", Journal of Community Psychology, 1, pp.168~173 (1973)
- Hess, J. L., "Insights from industry : A quantitative analysis of engineers' perceptions of empathy and care within their practice", European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), pp.1128~1153 (2017)
- Hosking, I., "Empathic engineering : Helping deliver dignity through design", Journal of medical engineering &technology, 39(7), pp.388~394 (2015)
- Knight, H., "How humans respond to robots: Building public policy through good design" (2014), Brookings
- Kouprie, M., "A framework for empathy in design : Stepping into and out of the user's life", Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), pp.437~448 (2009)
- LaMonica, E. L., "Empathy training as the major thrust of a staff development program", Nursing Research, 25, pp.447~451 (1976)
- The new plastics economy-rethinking the future of plastics, "McKinsey & Company", Ellen MacArthur Foundation, ~ (2016)
- Hojat, M., "Physician empathy : Definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty", American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(9), pp.1563~1569 (2002)
- Rubio, D. M., "Objectifying content validity : Conducting a content validity study in social work research", Social Work Research, 27(2), pp.94~104 (2003)
- Strobel, J., "Empathy and care within engineering : Qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers", Engineering Studies, 5(3), pp.137~159 (2013)
- Walther, J, "A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being", Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), pp.123~148 (2017)
- The future of jobs:Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. In Global challenge insight report, "World Economic Forum", World Economic Forum, ~ (2016)
- Harris Jr, C. E., "Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases" (2013), Cengage Learning
- Van de Poel, I., "Ethics, technology, and engineering: An introduction" (2011), John Wiley & Sons
- Whitbeck, C., "Ethics in engineering practice and research" (2011), Cambridge University Press