본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

수용체 모델(PMF)를 이용한 서울시 대기 중 VOCs의 배출원에 따른 위해성평가

Health Risk Assessment with Source Apportionment of Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds in Seoul by Positive Matrix Factorization

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: With volatile organic compounds (VOCs) containing aromatic and halogenated hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, and xylene that can adversely affect the respiratory and cardiovascular systems when a certain concentration is reached, it is important to accurately evaluate the source and the corresponding health risk effects. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to provide scientific evidence for the city of Seoul’s VOC reduction measures by confirming the risk of each VOC emission source. Methods: In 2020, 56 VOCs were measured and analyzed at one-hour intervals using an online flame ionization detector system (GC-FID) at two measuring stations in Seoul (Gangseo: GS, Bukhansan: BHS). The dominant emission source was identified using the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model, and health risk assessment was performed on the main components of VOCs related to the emission source. Results: Gasoline vapor and vehicle combustion gas are the main sources of emissions in GS, a residential area in the city center, and the main sources are solvent usage and aged VOCs in BHS, a greenbelt area. The risk index ranged from 0.01 to 0.02, which is lower than the standard of 1 for both GS and BHS, and was an acceptable level of 5.71×10–7 to 2.58×10–6 for carcinogenic risk. Conclusions: In order to reduce the level of carcinogenic risk to an acceptable safe level, it is necessary to improve and reduce the emission sources of vehicle combustion and solvent usage, and eco-car policies are judged to contribute to the reduction of combustion gas as well as providing a response to climate change.

Abstract

Background: With volatile organic compounds (VOCs) containing aromatic and halogenated hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, and xylene that can adversely affect the respiratory and cardiovascular systems when a certain concentration is reached, it is important to accurately evaluate the source and the corresponding health risk effects. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to provide scientific evidence for the city of Seoul’s VOC reduction measures by confirming the risk of each VOC emission source. Methods: In 2020, 56 VOCs were measured and analyzed at one-hour intervals using an online flame ionization detector system (GC-FID) at two measuring stations in Seoul (Gangseo: GS, Bukhansan: BHS). The dominant emission source was identified using the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model, and health risk assessment was performed on the main components of VOCs related to the emission source. Results: Gasoline vapor and vehicle combustion gas are the main sources of emissions in GS, a residential area in the city center, and the main sources are solvent usage and aged VOCs in BHS, a greenbelt area. The risk index ranged from 0.01 to 0.02, which is lower than the standard of 1 for both GS and BHS, and was an acceptable level of 5.71×10–7 to 2.58×10–6 for carcinogenic risk. Conclusions: In order to reduce the level of carcinogenic risk to an acceptable safe level, it is necessary to improve and reduce the emission sources of vehicle combustion and solvent usage, and eco-car policies are judged to contribute to the reduction of combustion gas as well as providing a response to climate change.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Kulmala M, "Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles : a review of observations", J Aerosol Sci, 35(2), pp.143~176 (2004)
  2. Seinfeld JH, "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics from Air Pollution to Climate Change", pp.26~ (2012), John Wiley &Sons
  3. Hajizadeh Y, "Environmental and biological monitoring of exposures to VOCs in a petrochemical complex in Iran", Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 25(7), pp.6656~6667 (2018)
  4. Shuai J, "Health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds exposure near Daegu dyeing industrial complex in South Korea", BMC Public Health, 18(1), pp.528~ (2018)
  5. Ministry of Environment, "Guidelines for Installation and Operation of Air Pollution Monitoring Networks", Ministry of Environment, ~ (2006)
  6. 한진석, "수용모델(CMB)을 이용한 수도권 VOCs의 배출원별 기여율 추정", 환경영향평가, 14(4), pp.227~235 (2005), 한국환경영향평가학회
  7. Kim YP, "Validation of the emission inventory of volatile organic compounds in Seoul", Part Aerosol Res, 5(3), pp.139~148 (2009)
  8. National Air Pollutants Emission, "Pollutant emissions in 2017" (2020), National Air Emission Inventory and Research Center
  9. Choi YJ, "Identification and Apportionment of VOC Emission Sources in Seoul" (2012), Seoul Development Institute
  10. Kang MK, "Source apportionment of organic carbons in PM2.5using the positive matrix factorization model: characterization of secondary organic aerosols at Seoul, Korea using SOA tracers", pp.2021
  11. 허종원, "PMF 수용모델을 이용한 평택 지역 PM10의 오염원 기여율 평가", 한국대기환경학회지, 34(6), pp.849~864 (2018), 한국대기환경학회[DOI]
  12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Technical assistance document for sampling and analysis of ozone precursors for the photochemical assessment monitoring stations program- revision 2" (2019), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  13. National Institute of Environmental Research, "National Academy of Environmental Sciences Notice No. 2020-30, Air Pollution Process Test Criteria for Ozone Precursors in Environmental Atmosphere-Automatic Measurement Method (ES 01805.1)", National Institute of Environmental Research, ~ (2020)
  14. 최우건, "PMF를 이용한 구미지역의 VOCs 오염원 및 기여도 확인", 실내환경 및 냄새 학회지, 9(2), pp.89~99 (2010), 한국냄새환경학회
  15. Chueinta W, "Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and suburban residential areas in Thailand by positive matrix factorization", Atmos Environ, 34(20), pp.3319~3329 (2000)
  16. Paatero P, "Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models", Anal Chim Acta, 490(1-2), pp.277~289 (2003)
  17. 김수미, "2017년 제주시 대기 중 PM2.5의 화학적 조성과 오염원 추정", 환경분석과 독성보건, 21(2), pp.61~70 (2018), 한국환경분석학회
  18. Derwent RG, "Photochemical ozone creation potentials for a large number of reactive hydrocarbons under European conditions", Atmos Environ, 30(2), pp.181~199 (1996)
  19. Leggett S, "Forecast distributions of species and their atmospheric reactivities for the U.K. VOC emission inventory", Atmos Environ, 30(2), pp.215~226 (1996)
  20. Derwent RG, "Photochemical ozone creation potentials for organic compounds in northwest Europe calculated with a master chemical mechanism", Atmos Environ, 32(14-15), pp.2429~2441 (1998)
  21. Derwent RG, "Reactivity-based strategies for photochemical ozone control in Europe", Environ Sci Policy, 10(5), pp.445~453 (2007)
  22. Regulations on methods of care for evaluation of chemicals No. 2021-13, "National Institute of Environmental Research", National Institute of Environmental Research, ~ (2021)
  23. Health Canada, "Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada Part I : Guidance on Human Health Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment(PQRA)", Health Canada, ~ (2004)
  24. Kindzierski W, "Plain Language Explanation of Human Health Risk Assessment" (2011), Oil Sands Research and Information Network
  25. Watson JG, "Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance", Atmos Environ, 35(9), pp.1567~1584 (2001)
  26. 한진석, "PMF를 이용한 수도권지역 VOCs의 배출원 추정", 한국대기환경학회지, 22(1), pp.85~97 (2006), 한국대기환경학회
  27. 박진환, "수용모델(PMF)을 이용한 광주산업단지 VOCs의 오염원별 기여도 추정", 한국환경과학회지, 30(3), pp.219~234 (2021), 한국환경과학회[DOI]
  28. Mukund R, "Source attribution of ambient air toxic and other VOCs in Columbus, Ohio", Atmos Environ, 30(20), pp.3457~3470 (1996)
  29. Brown SG, "Source apportionment of VOCs in the Los Angeles area using positive matrix factorization", Atmos Environ, 41(2), pp.227~237 (2007)
  30. 신혜정, "광화학측정망에서 측정한 휘발성유기화합물의 정도관리 방법", PARTICLE AND AEROSOL RESEARCH, 7(1), pp.31~45 (2011), 한국입자에어로졸학회
  31. Ling ZH, "Sources of ambient volatile organic compounds and their contributions to photochemical ozone formation at a site in the Pearl River Delta, southern China", Environ Pollut, 159(10), pp.2310~2319 (2011)
  32. Andersen AN, "Fire frequency and biodiversity conservation in Australian tropical savannas : implications from the Kapalga fire experiment", Austral Ecol, 30(2), pp.155~167 (2005)
  33. Milic A, "Biomass burning and biogenic aerosols in northern Australia during the SAFIRED campaign", Atmos Chem Phys, 17(6), pp.3945~3961 (2017)
  34. Pekey B, "The use of passive sampling to monitor spatial trends of volatile organic compounds(VOCs)at an industrial city of Turkey", Microchem J, 97(2), pp.213~219 (2011)
  35. Choi E, "Apportioning and locating nonmethane hydrocarbon sources to a background site in Korea", Environ Sci Technol, 44(15), pp.5849~5854 (2010)
  36. Zhou J, "Health risk assessment of personal inhalation exposure to volatile organic compounds in Tianjin, China", Sci Total Environ, 409(3), pp.452~459 (2011)
  37. Liu Y, "Characteristics, secondary transformation, and health risk assessment of ambient volatile organic compounds(VOCs)in urban Beijing, China", Atmos Pollut Res, 12(3), pp.33~46 (2021)
  38. Bari MA, "Ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Calgary, Alberta: sources and screening health risk assessment", Sci Total Environ, 631-632, pp.627~640 (2018)
  39. Annual Report of Cancer Statistics in Korea in 2018, "Korea Central Cancer Registry", National Cancer Center, ~ (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)