서울시 간선도로의 소음도 현황 및 예측식에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Status and Prediction of Arterial Road Noise in Seoul, Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Road traffic noise causes considerable disturbance and annoyance in exposed inhabitants. Particularly arterial roadnoise is significant environmental problem in many urban areas for higher traffic volume and car speed. Arterial roadnoise became the target of this investigation Seoul in Korea. Noise level were measured at four points that were basedon distance from roadside at the same measurement site and condition reported the National Institute of EnvironmentalResearch (NIER) in 1999. The average noise level (Leq,1h) of arterial road was 80.3 dBA at 5 m, 77.4 dBA at 10 m, 73.7dBA at 20 m, 70.9 dBA at 30 m. In case of the comparison between 1999 and 2008's measurement values, noise levelis up about 1.5 dBA, traffic volume increase about 15.7%, car speed decrease about 8% compared with 1999's measurementvalues. The relationship between 2008' measured values and predicted values using NIER Equation is lowunder 10 m at roadside. The influence range of arterial noise is calculated at 26 m by road noise limits in daytime. Incase of the comparison between traffic volume and noise level, relationship of equivalence traffic volume (Lightcar+10×Heavy car) is higher than other variables.
Abstract
Road traffic noise causes considerable disturbance and annoyance in exposed inhabitants. Particularly arterial roadnoise is significant environmental problem in many urban areas for higher traffic volume and car speed. Arterial roadnoise became the target of this investigation Seoul in Korea. Noise level were measured at four points that were basedon distance from roadside at the same measurement site and condition reported the National Institute of EnvironmentalResearch (NIER) in 1999. The average noise level (Leq,1h) of arterial road was 80.3 dBA at 5 m, 77.4 dBA at 10 m, 73.7dBA at 20 m, 70.9 dBA at 30 m. In case of the comparison between 1999 and 2008's measurement values, noise levelis up about 1.5 dBA, traffic volume increase about 15.7%, car speed decrease about 8% compared with 1999's measurementvalues. The relationship between 2008' measured values and predicted values using NIER Equation is lowunder 10 m at roadside. The influence range of arterial noise is calculated at 26 m by road noise limits in daytime. Incase of the comparison between traffic volume and noise level, relationship of equivalence traffic volume (Lightcar+10×Heavy car) is higher than other variables.
참고문헌 (13)
- 김화일, "소음지도 작성을 위한 도로교통소음 예측식의 적합성 연구", 한국환경과학회지, 16(7), pp.823~830 (2007), 한국환경과학회
- Piccolo, A., "Evaluation and analysis of the environmental noise of Messina, Italy", Applied Acoustics, 66, pp.447~465 (2005)
- 김득성, "개발 예정지역 도로교통소음 음향파워레벨 산정과 응용에 관한 연구", 한국소음진동공학회논문집, 15(6), pp.635~644 (2005), 한국소음진동공학회
- Hrstrm, E., "Effects of road traffic noise and benefit of access to quietness", Journal of Sound and Vibration, 295, pp.40~59 (2006)
- 박준철, "도로교통소음의 전파특성 및 영향", 한국환경보건학회지, 34(4), pp.311~315 (2008), 한국환경보건학회
- Kawaguchi, T., "Effects of road traffic noise on inhabitants of Tokyo", Journal of Sound and Vibration, 205(4), pp.517~522 (1997)
- Griefahn, B., "Noise emitted from road, rail and air traffic and their effects on sleep", Journal of Sound and Vibration, 295, pp.129~140 (2006)
- Ahmad, J., "Evaluation of traffic noise pollution in Amman, Jordan", Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 120, pp.499~525 (2006)
- Alberola, J., "Variability in road traffic noise levels", Applied Acoustics, 66, pp.1180~1195 (2005)
- Li, B., "GIS based road traffic noise prediction model", Applied Acoustics, 63, pp.679~697 (2002)
- 박상일, "도로교통 소음지도 작성에 관한 연구", 한국환경과학회지, 16(12), pp.1393~1399 (2007), 한국환경과학회
- Kang, D. J., "Road Traffic Noise(I)", The Report of National Institute of Environmental Research, 21, pp.149~162 (1999)
- Park, Y. M., "Technical improvement of traffic noise environmental impact assessment I", Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Autumn Conference, pp.55~58 (2005)