한의 임상 연구에 대한 국내외 현황 및 논쟁에 관한 고찰 - 미래 임상 연구 전략 Ⅰ-
Study on the Current Situation and Issues for Clinical Research in Korean Medicine worldwide - Future Clinical Research StrategyⅠ-
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explore the strategy of future Korean medicine(KM) clinical research through the study on the current situation and issues for KM clinical research worldwide. In this study, the papers published in English through Pubmed were investigated mainly. And we analyzed the methodological issues from the clinical research reports in the KM fields. As a result of examining the current situation of the RCTs(Randomized Controlled Trials) studies in KM, the sample size for most studies was small and the overall methodological quality appeared to be low. And there was a discussion about whether or not to apply RCTs method to the KM clinical research. The majority of studies have argued the use of RCTs method for KM clinical research. In addition, we could find some problems through the analysis of KM clinical studies. First, the majority of RCTs in KM were of low quality. Second, RCTs method was applied to the KM clinical studies according to the Western medicine methods only. Third, the actual KM diagnosis was not used in the KM studies and inadequate outcomes measurement methods were utilized without considering the characteristics of KM practice. The methodological issues in the KM clinical research were caused by the conflict between the characteristics of KM practice and clinical research method based on the western medicine.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the strategy of future Korean medicine(KM) clinical research through the study on the current situation and issues for KM clinical research worldwide. In this study, the papers published in English through Pubmed were investigated mainly. And we analyzed the methodological issues from the clinical research reports in the KM fields. As a result of examining the current situation of the RCTs(Randomized Controlled Trials) studies in KM, the sample size for most studies was small and the overall methodological quality appeared to be low. And there was a discussion about whether or not to apply RCTs method to the KM clinical research. The majority of studies have argued the use of RCTs method for KM clinical research. In addition, we could find some problems through the analysis of KM clinical studies. First, the majority of RCTs in KM were of low quality. Second, RCTs method was applied to the KM clinical studies according to the Western medicine methods only. Third, the actual KM diagnosis was not used in the KM studies and inadequate outcomes measurement methods were utilized without considering the characteristics of KM practice. The methodological issues in the KM clinical research were caused by the conflict between the characteristics of KM practice and clinical research method based on the western medicine.
참고문헌 (32)
- Shea, J.L., "Applying evidence-based medicine to traditional chinese medicine: debate and strategy", J Altern Complement Med, 12(3), pp.255~263 (2006)
- Verhoef, M.J., "Assessing efficacy of complementary medicine: adding qualitative research methods to the "Gold Standard"", J Altern Complement Med, 8(3), pp.275~281 (2002)
- Carter, B., "Methodological issues and complementary therapies: researching intangibles?", Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery, 9(3), pp.133~139 (2003)
- Critchley, J.A., "Alternative therapies and medical science: designing clinical trials of alternative", complementary medicines--is evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine attainable?, 2000, pp.40(5), 462~467
- Fønnebø, V., "Researching complementary and alternative treatments--the gatekeepers are not at home", BMC Med Res Methodol, 11(7), pp.7~ (2007)
- 대한한의학회, "근거중심의 한의치료", pp.4~33 (2012), 군자출판사
- Watanabe, K., "Traditional Japanese Kampo Medicine: Clinical Research between Modernity and Traditional Medicine-The State of Research and Methodological Suggestions for the Future", Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2011, pp.513842~ (2011)
- Jiang, M., "Clinical studies with traditional Chinese medicine in the past decade and future research and development", Planta Med, 76(17), pp.2048~2064 (2010)
- Wu, T., "Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?", Trials, 10, pp.46~ (2009)
- 오래영, "한약을 이용한 한국에서의 무작위 임상시험 개괄적 검토", 대한한의학회지, 31(4), pp.1~8 (2010), 대한한의학회
- Normile, D., "Asian medicine. The new face of traditional Chinese medicine", Science, 299(5604), pp.188~190 (2003)
- Ernst, E., "Methodological aspects of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)", Ann Acad Med Singapore, 35(11), pp.773~774 (2006)
- Ioannidis, J.P., "Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement", Ann Intern Med, 141(10), pp.781~788 (2004)
- Tang, J.L., "An efficacy-driven approach to the research and development of traditional Chinese medicine", Hong Kong Med J, 7(4), pp.375~380 (2001)
- Tang, J.L., "Research priorities in traditional Chinese medicine", BMJ, 333(7564), pp.391~394 (2006)
- Cardini, F., "Clinical research in traditional medicine: priorities and methods", Complement Ther Med, 14(4), pp.282~287 (2006)
- Wilson, K., "Closing comment: Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: is it a viable concept?", J Altern Complement Med, 8(6), pp.875~876 (2002)
- Mason, S., "Evaluating complementary medicine: methodological challenges of randomised controlled trials", BMJ, 325(7368), pp.832~834 (2002)
- Verhoef, M.J., "Complementary and alternative medicine whole systems research: beyond identification of inadequacies of the RCT", Complement Ther Med, 13(3), pp.206~212 (2005)
- Nahin, R.L., "Research into complementary and alternative medicine: problems and potential", BMJ, 322(7279), pp.161~164 (2001)
- Fan, R.P., "Modern Western science as a standard for traditional Chinese medicine: A critical appraisal", J Law Med Ethics, 31, pp.213~221 (2003)
- Linde, K., "The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture", Int J Epidemiol, 30(3), pp.526~531 (2001)
- Tang, J.L, "Review of randomised controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine", BMJ, 319(7203), pp.160~161 (1999)
- 김윤영, "국내 한약 처방을 이용한 무작위 배정 임상연구논문의 질 평가", 동의생리병리학회지, 25(5), pp.927~933 (2011), 대한동의병리학회
- 장민기, "무작위대조군연구(RCT)를 중심으로 한 근골격계 질환의 약침 치료에 관한 고찰", 대한침구의학회지, 26(3), pp.149~163 (2009), 대한침구의학회
- 서병관, "중풍 후 강직의 침구치료에 대한 계통적 연구", 대한침구의학회지, 27(6), pp.1~10 (2010), 대한침구의학회
- 한성수, "근거 중심 의학(EBM)에 바탕을 둔 임상시험(Clinical Trial)에서 침 치료 문제점과 개선 방안에 대하여", 대한침구의학회지, 23(6), pp.1~8 (2006), 대한침구의학회
- 문진석, "辨證을 위한 설문지 및 프로그램에 대한 특허정보 및 논문을 통한 연구 동향 분석", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 12(3), pp.17~29 (2006)
- Long, A.F., "Developing a tool to measure holistic practice: a missing dimension in outcomes measurement within complementary therapies", Complement Ther Med, 8(1), pp.26~31 (2000)
- Zhang, L., "Clinical Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine Needs to Develop Its Own System of Core Outcome Sets", Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2013, pp.202703~ (2013)
- Zhang, J.H., "Compound Salvia droplet pill, a traditional Chinese medicine, for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: a systematic review", Med Sci Monit, 14(1), pp.RA1~RA7 (2008)
- Junhua, Z., "Complex traditional Chinese medicine for poststroke motor dysfunction: a systematic review", Stroke, 40(8), pp.2797~2804 (2009)