도시공원의 공공성과 중심시설로서 커뮤니티센터의 역할에 관한 연구 - 얼바인시 지역사회 사례를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Publicness of Urban Park and the Role of Community Center - Focused on Community Cases in Irvine -
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The urban space of modern society does not give spatial choice to young people or children ingrowth development period. The physical space that affects the most important physical and psychologicaldevelopment in adolescence is the outdoor space, not the indoor space. Public Park is the most public space foryoung people. However, public parks can not be mentioned only in terms of space for teenagers or children, norshould they be mentioned as spaces for only one object. In other words, the publicness of the city is discussedon the assumption of 'openness' and 'accessibility' which are open to everyone and accessible anywhere, as canbe seen from the definition of 'public'. In this respect, this paper focuses not on dedicated space for youth orchildren, I want to deal with the meaning as a public facility. We also sought to explore new possibilities in oursociety by analyzing actual cases. In this paper, I would like to say that three important examinations are needed through case analysis of Irvinepublic system. The first is the meaning of park in modern society and the role of community center, the secondis the change of public facilities for community, and the last one is systematic network.
Abstract
The urban space of modern society does not give spatial choice to young people or children ingrowth development period. The physical space that affects the most important physical and psychologicaldevelopment in adolescence is the outdoor space, not the indoor space. Public Park is the most public space foryoung people. However, public parks can not be mentioned only in terms of space for teenagers or children, norshould they be mentioned as spaces for only one object. In other words, the publicness of the city is discussedon the assumption of 'openness' and 'accessibility' which are open to everyone and accessible anywhere, as canbe seen from the definition of 'public'. In this respect, this paper focuses not on dedicated space for youth orchildren, I want to deal with the meaning as a public facility. We also sought to explore new possibilities in oursociety by analyzing actual cases. In this paper, I would like to say that three important examinations are needed through case analysis of Irvinepublic system. The first is the meaning of park in modern society and the role of community center, the secondis the change of public facilities for community, and the last one is systematic network.
참고문헌 (18)
- 건축, 도시공간의 현대적 공공성에 관한 기초연구, "염철호", 건축도시공간연구소, ~ (2009)
- 도시 공공공간 개선방향설정을 위한 개념 정립 및 현황조사연구, "이상민", 건축도시공간연구소, ~ (2007)
- 임의영, "공공성의 유형화", 한국행정학보, 44(2), pp.1~21 (2010), 한국행정학회
- 헤르만 헤르츠버거, "헤르만 헤르츠버거의 건축수업" (2012), 효형
- 피터 홀, "내일의 도시" (2005), 한울아카데미
- 이수장, "푸코와 하버마스의 도시계획관 비교연구", 도시행정학보, 23(4), pp.345~362 (2010), 한국도시행정학회
- 박훈, "대규모공원의 도시적 의미와 계획특성 연구 -국내·외 도시공원을 중심으로-", 대한건축학회연합논문집, 14(3), pp.63~74 (2012), 대한건축학회지회연합회
- 채진해, "공원녹지기본계획의 운영체계 및 계획내용에 관한 연구 - 런던, 뉴욕, 베를린, 시드니, 서울 사례를 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 42(2), pp.91~102 (2014), 한국조경학회
- 최진희, "지역 공공시설과 청소년 프로그램 운영에 관한 연구 - 얼바인 시 운영시스템 사례를 중심으로 -", 청소년시설환경, 14(3), pp.29~36 (2016), 한국청소년시설환경학회
- 도시기본계획에 따른 서울의 생활권 계획 도입 및 운영방안 연구, "양재섭", 서울시정개발연구원, ~ (2011)
- Berns, R., "Child, Family, School, Community" (2016)
- Park and Recreation Needs Assesment, Parks and Park Facilities Master plan, "City of Irvine", ~ (2015)
- Parks and Facilities Master plan, "City of Irvine", ~ (2015)
- Parks and Recreation, General Plan of Irvine, "City of Irvine", ~ (2015)
- Public Facilities and Services Element, City of Irvine General Plan, "City of Irvine", ~ (2015)
- Strategic Plan for Children,Youth and Families Update 2013~2018, "City of Irvine", ~ (2015)
- Public Park and Facility Standards, City of Irvine Park Standards Manual, "City of Irvine", ~ (2014)
- Public Facilities and Services Element, G-1, City of Irvine General Plan, "City of Irvine", ~ (2011)