본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

環境分爭調整制度의 현황과 문제점

The Status and Problems of Environmental Dispute Mediation

0

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Since 1962, industrialization has raised many environmental pollution cases in Korea. Because we have an environmental age that protects us from the damage of environmental pollution and gradually adjusts a number of interests to profit the whole society, it is important that we have an ‘environmental dispute mediation’ system to the benefit of various interest groups. Coming into the 1970’s, the increase of environmental pollutions made the government realize the need to cope with this situation more actively. Because the victims of the environmental pollution find it difficult to get civil remedy such as the determination of the illegality of the pollution, and causality between environmental pollution and subsequent damages. The ‘Environmental Preservation Act’ in 1977 established the ‘Environmental Dispute Mediation Committee(EDMC)’. However, EDMC were insufficient for the resolution of environmental disputes. Therefore, the ‘Environmental Pollution Damage Dispute Mediation Act’ was enacted in 1990, and the Central Environmental Dispute Mediation Committee(CEDMC) became a standing organization. The rate of adjusted disputes by the CEDMC was over 72% in 1993. In 1997 the extent of environmental dispute were magnified by changing the ‘Environmental Dispute Mediation Act(EDMA)’. The EDMA provides for the remedy for environmental pollution with good offices, arbitrations, and adjudications. This article deals with the efficient operation of environment dispute mediation in Korea, Chapter 2 reviews environment dispute resolution system in other countries. Chapter 3 analyses the status quo of the environment dispute resolution system in Korea. Finally, chapter 4 proposes the solution for the problems in the environment dispute resolution system.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "신민사소송법" (2002), 박영사
  2. "독일환경사법론" (1998), 법원사
  3. "환경소송의 효용과 한계" (1995)
  4. "환경분쟁조정제도의 효율화 환경법연구" (1980)
  5. "환경침해불법행위" (1995)
  6. "환경분쟁조정제도에 관한 연구", 24(1) (2002)
  7. "환경분쟁조정제도의 개선방향", 9 (2001), 대한변호사협회
  8. "환경분쟁조정법의 제문제", 50(12) (2001)
  9. 제7권, "徐元宇ㆍ崔松和 환경분쟁조정제도의 개발에 관한 연구 환경법연구" (1985)
  10. "중국의 인민조정제도에 관한 연구", 10(3) (2003)
  11. "환경분쟁조정제도의 절차적 과제 인권과 정의" (1994)
  12. "독일에서의 재판에 의하지 아니한 분쟁해결제도" (1997)
  13. "재판외 분쟁해결제도의 현황과 과제", (300) (2001)
  14. "재판외 분쟁해결제도-미국의 ADR을 중심으로-", (26) (1999)
  15. 전경운, "한국 환경입법의 개관", 12 (1995)
  16. "교량에 의한 일조방해시 손해배상의 성립여부", 392 (2003)
  17. "환경침해피해의 사법상 구제법리", 25(2) (2003)
  18. "환경분쟁조정제도의 현황과 앞으로의 개선과제 인권과 정의" (1994)
  19. "환경오염피해분쟁조정제도의 개선방향" (1994)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)