본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

TOPKAT®, Derek®, OECD toolbox를 활용한 화학물질 독성 예측 연구

Toxicity Prediction using Three Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship (QSAR) Programs (TOPKAT®, Derek®, OECD toolbox)

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is one of the effective alternatives to animal testing, but its credibility in terms of toxicity prediction has been questionable. Thus, this work aims to evaluate its predictive capacity and find ways of improving its credibility. Methods: Using TOPKAT®, OECD toolbox, and Derek®, all of which have been applied world-wide in the research, industrial, and regulatory fields, an analysis of prediction credibility markers including accuracy (A), sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), false negative (FN), and false positive (FP) was conducted. Results: The multi-application of QSARs elevated the precision credibility relative to individual applications of QSARs. Moreover, we found that the type of chemical structure affects the credibility of markers significantly. Conclusions: The credibility of individual QSAR is insufficient for both the prediction of chemical toxicity and regulation of hazardous chemicals. Thus, to increase the credibility, multi-QSAR application, and compensation of the prediction deviation by chemical structure are required.

Abstract

Objectives: Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is one of the effective alternatives to animal testing, but its credibility in terms of toxicity prediction has been questionable. Thus, this work aims to evaluate its predictive capacity and find ways of improving its credibility. Methods: Using TOPKAT®, OECD toolbox, and Derek®, all of which have been applied world-wide in the research, industrial, and regulatory fields, an analysis of prediction credibility markers including accuracy (A), sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), false negative (FN), and false positive (FP) was conducted. Results: The multi-application of QSARs elevated the precision credibility relative to individual applications of QSARs. Moreover, we found that the type of chemical structure affects the credibility of markers significantly. Conclusions: The credibility of individual QSAR is insufficient for both the prediction of chemical toxicity and regulation of hazardous chemicals. Thus, to increase the credibility, multi-QSAR application, and compensation of the prediction deviation by chemical structure are required.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Ganesan S, "Impacts of perfluorinated compounds on human health", Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci, 4, pp.183~191 (2015)
  2. Lee JW, "n-Butyl acrylate-induced antioxidant system alteration through two generations in Oryzias latipes", Fish Physiology and Biochemistry (2018)[DOI]
  3. Lee JW, "Metformin-induced endocrine disruption and oxidative stress of Oryzias latipes on two-generational condition", J Hazard Mater, 5, pp.171~181 (2019)
  4. Korean Society of Environmental Health, "Environmental Health", pp.19~33 (2016), Episteme Press
  5. "Act on the Registration and Evaluation"[URL]
  6. 김광연, "Assessment of quantitative structure-activity relationship of toxicity prediction models for Korean chemical substance control legislation", 환경독성보건학회지, 30, pp.1~10 (2015), 환경독성보건학회
  7. "Analysis report: the effect of domestic industry according to EU-REACH legislation"[URL]
  8. 김정곤, "OECD QSAR Application Toolbox를 이용한 화학물질의 건강유해성 및 생태독성 예측", 한국환경보건학회지, 39(2), pp.130~137 (2013), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  9. "A study for the improvement of a prediction using QSAR models to find out hazardous substances (I)" (2018)[URL]
  10. 김현욱, "QSAR(정량적구조활성관계)를 이용한 환경 중 잔류의약품류의 물리화학적 특성 및 독성 예측", 환경분석과 독성보건, 13(1), pp.45~53 (2010), 한국환경분석학회
  11. Mays C, "Use and perceived benefits and barriers of QSAR models for REACH : findings from a questionnaire to stakeholders", Chem Cent J, 6(1), pp.159~ (2012)
  12. 성낙도, "정량적인 구조-활성상관(QSAR) 기법에 의한 새로운 농약의 개발. Ⅲ. 3D QSAR 기법들과 컴퓨터를 이용한 분자설계(CAMD)", 농약과학회지, 7(1), pp.1~11 (2003), 한국농약과학회
  13. Cariello NF, "Comparison of the computer programs DEREK and TOPKAT to predict bacterial mutagenicity", Mutagenesis, 17(4), pp.321~329 (2002)
  14. 김지영, "전자산업에서 사용하는 화학물질의 독성예측을 위한 QSAR 접근법", 한국환경보건학회지, 40(2), pp.105~113 (2014), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  15. "A study on the best application of (Q)SARs to predict aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals" (2010)[URL]
  16. Klimisch HJ, "A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data", Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 25, pp.1~5 (1997)
  17. "Study on the improvement of mutagenicity prediction using QSARs models" (2016)[URL]
  18. "Study on the improvement of genotoxicity prediction using QSARs models" (2017)[URL]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)