The Supplementary Fund Regime And Korea’s Past Strategy - After the Hebei Spirit Incident -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Hebei Spirit incident made the Korean government reflect on its strategy in light of Korea’s participation in the Supplementary Fund Regime. The Korean government could have ratified the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol, and thus could have enjoyed the benefits of compensation in the event of an oil pollution disaster. Why did the Korean government fail to ratify the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol? What was Korea’s strategyat the time? This paper starts with those questions. The basic purpose of this paper is to look back Korea’s strategy regarding the Supplementary Fund Regime, and reaffirm the necessity of ratification of the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol. Towards this end, this paper will address as follows: section(Ⅱ) explains the history of IOPC Fund Regimes, section(Ⅲ²) deals with the main contents of the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol, section(Ⅳ) analyzes the past Korea’s analysis and strategy toward the Supplementary Fund Regime, and section(Ⅴ) addresses the Hebei Spirit case and the critical review of past Korea’sstrategy. The remaining questions after ratification will be shown up finally in section(Ⅵ).
Abstract
The Hebei Spirit incident made the Korean government reflect on its strategy in light of Korea’s participation in the Supplementary Fund Regime. The Korean government could have ratified the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol, and thus could have enjoyed the benefits of compensation in the event of an oil pollution disaster. Why did the Korean government fail to ratify the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol? What was Korea’s strategyat the time? This paper starts with those questions. The basic purpose of this paper is to look back Korea’s strategy regarding the Supplementary Fund Regime, and reaffirm the necessity of ratification of the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol. Towards this end, this paper will address as follows: section(Ⅱ) explains the history of IOPC Fund Regimes, section(Ⅲ²) deals with the main contents of the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol, section(Ⅳ) analyzes the past Korea’s analysis and strategy toward the Supplementary Fund Regime, and section(Ⅴ) addresses the Hebei Spirit case and the critical review of past Korea’sstrategy. The remaining questions after ratification will be shown up finally in section(Ⅵ).
참고문헌 (20)
- Anton, Donald K., "International Environmental Law: Cases, Materials, Problems", San Francisco: LexisNexis, ~ (2007)
- Atapattu, Sumudu A, "Emerging Principles of International Environmental Law", New York: Transnational Publishers Inc., ~ (2006)
- Bodansky, Daniel, "The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law" (2007), New York: Oxford University Press
- Hunter, David, "International Environmental Law and Policy, 3rd ed" (2007), New York: Foundation Press
- Kato, Ichiro, "Environmental Law and Policy in the Pacific Basin Area" (1981), Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press
- Louka,Elli, "International Environmental Law: Fairness, Effectiveness, and World Order" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Miles, Edward L., "Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence" (2001), MIT Press
- Nanda, Ved P., "International Environmental Law & Policy for the 21st Century", New York: Transnational Publishers Inc., ~ (2003)
- Weiss, Edith Brown, "International Environmental Law and Policy, 2d ed", New York: Aspen Publishers, ~ (2007)
- Lee, Young Jun, "The theory of International Environmental Law", Bubmunsa, ~ (1995)
- Yu, Byeong Hwa, "Byeong Hwa.International Environmental Law" (1997), Jinsungsa
- Chai,Lee Sik, "A Study on the Protocol of 2003 to the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992", Study of Maritime Law, 15(1) (2003)
- Chun,Kyong Un, "A Study on Legal Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage", Environmental Law Research, 30(2) (2008)
- Faure, Michael G., "Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage: China versus the International Regime", Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 9(1) (2005)
- Jacobsson, M, "The Significance of the Third Tier Supplementary Fund and the On?going Review of the International Compensation Regime", Petroleum Association of Japan Oil Spill Symposium, ~ (2005)
- Kang,Ryang, "A Study on International environmental Regime?The Case of the Antarctic Treaty System", Ocean and Polar Research, 28(2) (2006)
- Lee,Young Jun, "A Study on Current Law Systems related with Maritime Environment Protection", Kyung Hee Law Journal, 33(1) (1988)
- Mok,Jin Yong, "The response to the 2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol and oil pollution damage compensation system’s amendment", Basic Research, ~ (2005)
- Mok,Jin Yong, "Recent trends toward international oil pollution damage compensation regime", Ocean Policy Research,Vol.1211, ~ (2006)
- Van Dyke,J.M, "The Legal Regime Governing Sea Transport of Ultrahazardous Radioactive Materials", Ocean Development & International Law,Vol.33, ~ (2002)