역학연구에서의 비역치선형모델: 방사선 노출 사례
The Linear No-Threshold Model in Epidemiological Studies: An Example of Radiation Exposure
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The linear no-threshold (LNT) model is an assumption that explains the dose-response relationship for health risks, allowing for linear extrapolation from high doses to low doses without a threshold. The selection of an appropriate model for low-dose risk evaluation is a critical component in the risk assessment process for hazardous agents. This paper reviews the LNT model in light of epidemiological evidence from major international consortia studying ionizing radiation. From a scientific perspective, substantial evidence supporting the LNT model has been observed in epidemiological studies of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure, although some findings suggest non-linear dose relationships for certain cancer sites and variations across populations. From a practical standpoint, the LNT remains the most useful model for radiation protection purposes, with no alternative dose-response relationship proving more appropriate. It is important to note that the LNT model does not directly ref lect the magnitude of risk at the population level, and this distinction should be clearly communicated to the public. While applying the LNT model as the principal basis for radiation protection, continuous research into various dose-response relationships is crucial for advancing our understanding.
Abstract
The linear no-threshold (LNT) model is an assumption that explains the dose-response relationship for health risks, allowing for linear extrapolation from high doses to low doses without a threshold. The selection of an appropriate model for low-dose risk evaluation is a critical component in the risk assessment process for hazardous agents. This paper reviews the LNT model in light of epidemiological evidence from major international consortia studying ionizing radiation. From a scientific perspective, substantial evidence supporting the LNT model has been observed in epidemiological studies of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure, although some findings suggest non-linear dose relationships for certain cancer sites and variations across populations. From a practical standpoint, the LNT remains the most useful model for radiation protection purposes, with no alternative dose-response relationship proving more appropriate. It is important to note that the LNT model does not directly ref lect the magnitude of risk at the population level, and this distinction should be clearly communicated to the public. While applying the LNT model as the principal basis for radiation protection, continuous research into various dose-response relationships is crucial for advancing our understanding.
참고문헌 (35)
- White RH, "State-of-the-science workshop report : issues and approaches in lowdose-response extrapolation for environmental health risk assessment", Environ Health Perspect, 117(2), pp.283~287 (2009)
- Calabrese EJ, "Ethical challenges of the linear non-threshold(LNT)cancer risk assessment revolution : history, insights, and lessons to be learned", Sci Total Environ, 832, pp.155054~ (2022)
- Health Physics Society, "Position statement of the health physics society PS010-4 : radiation risk in perspective", Health Phys, 118(1), pp.79~80 (2020)
- International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC), "IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans volume 100D", WHO, ~ (2012)
- Lee WJ, "Radiation epidemiology" (2022), Korea University Press
- UNSCEAR 2020, "2021 report volume III scientific annex C: biological mechanisms relevant for the inference of cancer risks from low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation", United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), 2021
- UNSCEAR 2012 report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes A and B, "United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR)", United Nations, ~ (2015)
- UNSCEAR 2006 report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes. Volume I. Annex A and B, "United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR)", United Nations, ~ (2008)
- Hamada N, "An update on effects of ionizing radiation exposure on the eye", Br J Radiol, 93(1115), pp.20190829~ (2020)
- International Commission on Radiological Protection(ICRP), "ICRP publication 103 : the 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection", Ann ICRP, 37(2-4), pp.1~332 (2007)
- Shore RE, "Commentary no. 27 - implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear-nonthreshold model and radiation protection", National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, ~ (2018)
- World Health Organization (WHO), "Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation", WHO Press, ~ (2013)
- Laurier D, "The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold(LNT)model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection", J Radiol Prot, 43(2), pp.024003~ (2023)
- Calabrese EJ, "Origin of the linearity no threshold(LNT)doseresponse concept", Arch Toxicol, 87(9), pp.1621~1633 (2013)
- Cardarelli J 2nd, "The history of the linear no-threshold model and recommendations for a path forward", Health Phys, 124(2), pp.131~135 (2023)
- Tubiana M, "The linear nothreshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data", Radiology, 251(1), pp.13~22 (2009)
- Boice JD Jr, "The linear nonthreshold(LNT)model as used in radiation protection : an NCRP update", Int J Radiat Biol, 93(10), pp.1079~1092 (2017)
- National Research Council, "Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2" (2006), The National Academies Press
- UNSCEAR 2019 report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes. Annex A and B, "United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR)", United Nations, ~ (2020)
- Rühm W, "Cancer risk following low doses of ionising radiation-current epidemiological evidence and implications for radiological protection", Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen, 873, pp.503436~ (2022)
- Berrington de Gonzalez A, "Epidemiological studies of lowdose ionizing radiation and cancer : rationale and framework for the monograph and overview of eligible studies", J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2020(56), pp.97~113 (2020)
- Cho KW, "ICRP Publication 138 : ethical foundations of the system of radiological protection", Ann ICRP, 47(1), pp.1~65 (2018)
- International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), "Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 9" (1966), Pergamon Press
- Report no. 136 - evaluation of the linear-nonthreshold dose-response model for ionizing radiation, "Upton AC", National Council on Radiation Protection and measurements, ~ (2001)
- Berrington de Gonzalez A, "Cancer epidemiology and prevention", pp.227~248 (2017), Oxford University Press
- Richardson DB, "Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation : retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States(INWORKS)", BMJ, 351, pp.h5359~ (2015)
- Richardson DB, "Cancer mortality after low dose exposure to ionising radiation in workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States(INWORKS) : cohort study", BMJ, 382, pp.e074520~ (2023)
- Leuraud K, "Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers(INWORKS) : an international cohort study", Lancet Haematol, 2(7), pp.e276~e281 (2015)
- Leuraud K, "Leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma mortality after low level exposure to ionizing radiation: updated findings from an international cohort study of nuclear workers (INWORKS)", Lancet Haematol
- Hauptmann M, "Brain cancer after radiation exposure from CT examinations of children and young adults : results from the EPI-CT cohort study", Lancet Oncol, 24(1), pp.45~53 (2023)
- Bosch de Basea Gomez M, "Risk of hematological malignancies from CT radiation exposure in children, adolescents and young adults", Nat Med, 29(12), pp.3111~3119 (2023)
- Lee WJ, "Epidemiology of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure and health effects", J Environ Health Sci, 49(1), pp.1~10 (2023)
- Shore R, "Risk of solid cancer in low dose-rate radiation epidemiological studies and the dose-rate effectiveness factor", Int J Radiat Biol, 93(10), pp.1064~1078 (2017)
- Little MP, "Low-dose extrapolation factors implied by mortality and incidence data from the Japanese atomic bomb survivor life span study data", Radiat Res, 198(6), pp.582~589 (2022)
- Rühm W, "Dose and dose-rate effects of ionizing radiation : a discussion in the light of radiological protection", Radiat Environ Biophys, 54(4), pp.379~401 (2015)