노인 암환자의 치료선택 의사결정 경험: 질적 메타합성 연구
Decision-making experience of older patients with cancer in choosing treatment: A qualitative meta-synthesis study
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was conducted to analyze and synthesize the findings of qualitative studies related to the decision-making experience of older patients with cancer in choosing treatment. Methods: We used the seven steps of Noblit and Hare’s meta-ethnography to analyze and synthesize selected qualitative studies. Seven databases were used to search the literature that explored the decision-making experiences of older patients with cancer in choosing treatment: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Research Informations Sharing Service(RISS), Koreastudies Information Service System(KISS), and National Assembly Library. Results: The final 11 studies were included in the analysis. Three themes emerged as result of synthesizing:“Checking the feasibility of treatment in one’s own life”,“The constant weighing up the gains and losses of treatment”, and “Having meanings to life”. Conclusion: This study provides an in-depth understanding of treatment decision-making experiences of older patients with cancer and highlights the complex factors that influence their treatment decision-making process. This may contribute to the development of interventions that help older patients with cancer choose treatment during the decision-making process.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to analyze and synthesize the findings of qualitative studies related to the decision-making experience of older patients with cancer in choosing treatment. Methods: We used the seven steps of Noblit and Hare’s meta-ethnography to analyze and synthesize selected qualitative studies. Seven databases were used to search the literature that explored the decision-making experiences of older patients with cancer in choosing treatment: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Research Informations Sharing Service(RISS), Koreastudies Information Service System(KISS), and National Assembly Library. Results: The final 11 studies were included in the analysis. Three themes emerged as result of synthesizing:“Checking the feasibility of treatment in one’s own life”,“The constant weighing up the gains and losses of treatment”, and “Having meanings to life”. Conclusion: This study provides an in-depth understanding of treatment decision-making experiences of older patients with cancer and highlights the complex factors that influence their treatment decision-making process. This may contribute to the development of interventions that help older patients with cancer choose treatment during the decision-making process.
참고문헌 (34)
- Sophie Pilleron, "Estimated global cancer incidence in the oldest adults in 2018 and projections to 2050", International Journal of Cancer, 148(3), pp.601~608 (2021), Wiley[DOI]
- "Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2018" (2021)[URL]
- Kim JH, "Geriatric cancer", Board review, pp.390~393 (2018), The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
- Ni Gong, "Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: a qualitative study", Nursing Ethics, 28(2), pp.242~252 (2021), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- A.M. Stiggelbout, "Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice", Patient Education and Counseling, 98(10), pp.1172~1179 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- "2017", 17(4), Sultan Qaboos University, pp.10.18295, squmj.2017.17.04.001
- 임연옥, "의사의 노인 암 환자에 대한 차별: 암 진단 고지와 치료 설명을 중심으로", Korean Journal of Health Promotion, 16(2), pp.101~110 (2016), 대한임상건강증진학회[DOI]
- 최한교, "노인 암환자의 자아통합감 회복 경험: 근거이론 접근", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 49(3), pp.349~360 (2019), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
- 이희정, "노인 암 환자의 수술 의사결정참여에 대한 영향요인", 노인간호학회지, 15(1), pp.1~10 (2013), 한국노인간호학회
- Allison Tong, "Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research:ENTREQ", BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), pp.181~ (2012), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Matthew J. Page, "The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews", Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 74(9), pp.790~799 (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- "CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist" (2019)[URL]
- Noblit GW, "Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studie", pp.51~ (1988), Sage Publications
- Mairead Cahill, "Qualitative synthesis: a guide to conducting a meta-ethnography", British Journal of Occupational Therapy, pp.129~137 (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Francine Toye, "Metaethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesizing a large number of qualitative studies", BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1) (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Barbara Kreling, "A qualitative study of factors affecting chemotherapy use in older women with breast cancer: barriers, promoters, and implications for intervention", Psycho-Oncology, 15(12), pp.1065~1076 (2006), Wiley[DOI]
- Lopa Sadia Husain, "Choices in cancer treatment: a qualitative study of the older women's (>70 years) perspective", Psycho-Oncology, 17(4), pp.410~416 (2008), Wiley[DOI]
- Helena Harder, "Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with breast cancer: patients' perspectives on information giving and decision making", Psycho-Oncology, 22(12), pp.2729~2735 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
- Mara A. Schonberg, "Older women's experience with breast cancer treatment decisions", Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 145(1), pp.211~223 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Maria Burton, "The information and decision support needs of older women (>75 yrs) facing treatment choices for breast cancer: a qualitative study", Psycho-Oncology, 24(8), pp.878~884 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
- Kate J Lifford, "Understanding older women's decision making and coping in the context of breast cancer treatment", BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15(1), pp.45~ (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Morgan JL, "The balance of clinician and patient input into treatment decision-making in older women with operable breast cancer", Psychooncology, 24(12), pp.1761~1766 (2015)[DOI]
- Sowerbutts AM, "Why are older women not having surgery for breast cancer? a qualitative study", Psychooncology, 24(9), pp.1036~1042 (2015)[DOI]
- Sattar S, "Chemotherapy and radiation treatment decisionmaking experiences of older adults with cancer : a qualitative study", Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 9(1), pp.47~52 (2018)[DOI]
- Lawhon VM, ""It's important to me": a qualitative analysis on shared decision-making and patient preferences in older adults with early-stage breast cancer", Psychooncology, 30(2), pp.167~175 (2021)[DOI]
- "2019 Cause of Death Statistics Results" (2020)[URL]
- Youn‐Jung Son, "Patients’ needs and perspectives for using mobile phone interventions to improve heart failure self‐care: A qualitative study", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(9), pp.2380~2390 (2020), Wiley[DOI]
- Kim EY, "Developing a conceptual model of older patients'decision-making process in choosing dialysis or conservative care using meta-ethnography", Journal of Advanced Nursing (2021)
- McMullen S, "Treatment decisions for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer : patient and physician perspectives on maintenance therapy", The Patient : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 12(2), pp.223~233 (2019)[DOI]
- 유현미, "항암화학요법을 받는 암 환자의 치료에 대한 태도 및 디스트레스가 치료의사결정갈등에 미치는 영향", Asian Oncology Nursing, 19(4), pp.242~251 (2019), 대한종양간호학회[DOI]
- Hanson S, "What matters at the end of life : a qualitative study of older peoples perspectives in southern Denmark", Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 5, pp.1~11 (2019)[DOI]
- 김신미, "노인 암환자의 건강관련 삶의 질 영향요인: 2015년 한국의료패널 자료 분석", 가정간호학회지, 27(2), pp.156~168 (2020), 한국가정간호학회[DOI]
- Shay LA, "Making my own decisions sometimes : a pilot study of young adult cancer survivors' perspectives on medical decision-making", Journal of Cancer Education, 33(6), pp.1341~1346 (2018)[DOI]
- 박소영, "중고령자의 디지털정보접근성이 우울 증상에 미치는 영향: 디지털정보활용능력과 사회적 네트워크의 매개효과를 중심으로", 보건사회연구, 39(3), pp.179~214 (2019), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]