장기요양시설 간호종사자의 완화·생애말기 돌봄 준비도 측정도구의 한국어판 타당도와 신뢰도: 방법론적 연구
Validity and reliability of Korean version of the nursing staff preparedness for palliative and end-of-life care in long-term care homes: A methodological study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Globally, the issue of palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC) in nursing homes is a common concern, and the need to measure the preparedness of nursing staff for end-of-life care is increasing. This study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the self-reported scale for the Staff Preparedness for PEOLC in long-term care homes. Methods: A total of 161 staff took part in the study; among them were nine nurses, 19 nursing assistants, 133 care workers at four nursing homes located in Wonju and Seongnam cities, South Korea. The scale was translated according to the guidelines of World Health Organization guidelines and Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments, and its reliability and validity were evaluated through assessing its internal consistency, stability, and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis, CFA). Results: CFA confirmed that the measurement tool had a good fit (comparative fit index=.96, Turker-Lewis index=.95, root mean-squared error of approximation=.07). The items’ internal consistencies of the items were found to be reliable with Cronbach’s alpha=.94; the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between test and retest of the tool was .86 (p<.001); and the intraclass correlation coefficient value was .91 (95% confidence interval: .85~.96). Conclusion: The Korean version of the Staff Preparedness for PEOLC in long-term care homes was confirmed to be a useful and reliable scale for measuring the preparedness of nursing staff in Korean long-term care facilities in Korea for PEOLC.
Abstract
Purpose: Globally, the issue of palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC) in nursing homes is a common concern, and the need to measure the preparedness of nursing staff for end-of-life care is increasing. This study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the self-reported scale for the Staff Preparedness for PEOLC in long-term care homes. Methods: A total of 161 staff took part in the study; among them were nine nurses, 19 nursing assistants, 133 care workers at four nursing homes located in Wonju and Seongnam cities, South Korea. The scale was translated according to the guidelines of World Health Organization guidelines and Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments, and its reliability and validity were evaluated through assessing its internal consistency, stability, and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis, CFA). Results: CFA confirmed that the measurement tool had a good fit (comparative fit index=.96, Turker-Lewis index=.95, root mean-squared error of approximation=.07). The items’ internal consistencies of the items were found to be reliable with Cronbach’s alpha=.94; the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between test and retest of the tool was .86 (p<.001); and the intraclass correlation coefficient value was .91 (95% confidence interval: .85~.96). Conclusion: The Korean version of the Staff Preparedness for PEOLC in long-term care homes was confirmed to be a useful and reliable scale for measuring the preparedness of nursing staff in Korean long-term care facilities in Korea for PEOLC.
참고문헌 (30)
- "Future population projections: 2017-2067" (2019)[URL]
- "2023 Status of senior welfare facilities" (2023)[URL]
- "2019 Long-term care status report" (2020)[URL]
- Health Quality Ontario, "Team-based models for end-of-life care : an evidence-based analysis", Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series, 14(20), pp.1~49 (2014)
- "What end of life care involves" (2022)[URL]
- "Palliative care" (2020)[URL]
- Reimer-Kirkham S, "‘Close to’ a palliative approach : nurses’ and care aides’ descriptions of caring for people with advancing chronic life-limiting conditions", Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(15-16), pp.2189~2199 (2016)[DOI]
- Kwon SH, "Current status of end-of-life care education in undergraduate nursing curriculum", Korean J Hosp Palliat Care, 22(4), pp.174~184 (2019)[DOI]
- Ahn ES, "A qualitative study on the death experiences of caregivers at nursing homes for the elderly", Health and Social Welfare Review, 41(2), pp.198~221 (2021)[DOI]
- Jeong YH, "End of life care competencies and terminal care stress of nurses in long term care hospitals", Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 22(3), pp.125~133 (2019)[DOI]
- Erel M, "Barriers to palliative care for advanced dementia : a scoping review", Annals of Palliative Medicine, 6(4), pp.365~379 (2017)[DOI]
- Anstey S, "Education and training to enhance end-of-life care for nursing home staff : a systematic literature review", BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 6(3), pp.353~361 (2016)[DOI]
- Chan HY, "Staff preparedness for providing palliative and end-of-life care in long-term care homes : instrument development and validation", Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 18(5), pp.745~749 (2018)[DOI]
- Karacsony S, "An instrument to assess the education needs of nursing assistants within a palliative approach in residential aged care facilities", BMC Palliative Care, 18(1), pp.61~ (2019)[DOI]
- Ohmura M, "Development of a nursing competence for end-of-life care scale in nursing homes", Journal of Japan Society of Nursing Research, 39(1), pp.29~35 (2016)
- Long CO, "Development of the questionnaire on palliative care for advanced dementia(qPAD)", American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 27(7), pp.537~543 (2012)[DOI]
- Thompson S, "A measure of palliative care in nursing homes", Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(1), pp.57~67 (2011)[DOI]
- Gagnier JJ, "COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. A measure of palliative care in nursing homes", Quality of Life Research, 30(8), pp.2197~2218 (2021)[DOI]
- Anderson JC, "Structural equation modeling in practice : a review and recommended two-step approach", Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411~423 (1988)[DOI]
- "WHO process of translation and adaptation of instruments" (2009)[URL]
- Polit DF, "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations", Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), pp.459~467 (2007)[DOI]
- Lee EO, "Nursing research and statistical analysis", pp.773~ (2009), Soomoonsa
- Polite DF, "Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice", pp.796~ (2008), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Durojaiye A, "Student nurse education and preparation for palliative care : a scoping review", PLoS One, 18(7), pp.e0286678~ (2023)[DOI]
- Browne MW, "Alternative ways of assessing model fit", Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), pp.230~258 (1992)[DOI]
- Song JJ, "SPSS and AMOS statistical analysis method", pp.61~99 (2016), 21 Century
- Cicchetti DV, "Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology", Psychological Assessment, 6(4), pp.284~290 (1994)[DOI]
- Lee EH, "Psychometric properties of measurement instruments 4 : reliability and responsiveness", Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 27(4), pp.275~277 (2021)[DOI]
- Kim JH, "Cancer unit nurses’ end-of-life care-related stress, under standing and training needs", Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 15(4), pp.205~211 (2012)[DOI]
- Lee JS, "A study on working conditions and factors related to job satisfaction of nurses in the long-term care facilities for the elderly", Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing, 29(3), pp.551~564 (2015)[DOI]