한국판 임종치료선호도(Preferences for Care Near the End of Life Scale-Korean Version: PCEOL-K)의 신뢰도 및 타당도
Validating the Korean Version of the Preferences for Care near the End of Life (PCEOL-K) Scale
1
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Preferences for Care near the End of Life (PCEOL-K) scale. Original items on the PCEOL scale were translated from English into Korean and polished by means of retranslation back into English with editorial supervision by experts. A convenience sample of 247 nursing students participated in the study. Content validity and test-retest reliability tests were performed and descriptive statistics, factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and Pearson Correlation Coefficient were utilized. Five factors from the original PCEOL were validated with minor variations. Reliability estimates (internal consistency) for the factors ranged from 0.42 to 0.89. Retest stability estimates for PCEOL-K showed correlations of p=.000 for factor scores over a 2-week interval. As a result, PCEOL-K is a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for evaluating preferences regarding care near the end of life.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Preferences for Care near the End of Life (PCEOL-K) scale. Original items on the PCEOL scale were translated from English into Korean and polished by means of retranslation back into English with editorial supervision by experts. A convenience sample of 247 nursing students participated in the study. Content validity and test-retest reliability tests were performed and descriptive statistics, factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and Pearson Correlation Coefficient were utilized. Five factors from the original PCEOL were validated with minor variations. Reliability estimates (internal consistency) for the factors ranged from 0.42 to 0.89. Retest stability estimates for PCEOL-K showed correlations of p=.000 for factor scores over a 2-week interval. As a result, PCEOL-K is a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for evaluating preferences regarding care near the end of life.
참고문헌 (20)
- Vig EK, "Good deaths, bad deaths, and preferences for the end of life: a qualititive study of geriatric outpatients", J Am Geriatr Soc, 50(9), pp.1541~1548 (2002)
- Libbus MK, "Congruence of decisions between patients and their potential surrogates about life-sustaining therapies", Image, 27(2), pp.135~140 (1995)
- Wolf SM, "Etics committees in the courts", Hastings Cent Rep, 16, pp.12~15 (1986)
- Watts J, "Korean Medical Association stirs up controversy", The Lancet, 358(1), pp.1881~ (2001)
- 김순이, "성인의 Advance Directives에 대한 태도 연구", 의료.윤리.교육, 4(2), pp.231~244 (2001)
- 윤영호, "품위 있는 죽음과 호스피스 완화의료에 대한 일반 국민들의 태도", 한국호스피스완화의료학회지, 7(1), pp.17~28 (2004), 한국호스피스완화의료학회
- 보건복지부, "보도해명자료. 2008년 2월 18일", ~ (2008)
- KBS, "추적 60분, 2007. 08. 29 방송", ~ (2007)
- 한국일보, "2004. 06. 30일자 보도자료", ~ (2004)
- 오상도, "안락사문제 바로 볼 때다. 서울신문, 2008년 2월 20일자 보도자료", ~ (2008)
- "Nancy Cruzan Dies, Outlived by a Debate Over the Right to Die. The New York Times, Published: Thursday. December 27. 1990"[URL]
- PROBATE DIVISION. IN The Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated, "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA", ~, pp.No. 90-2908GD-003
- "생각해봅시다/존엄사 결정, 누가? 어떻게? 윤리적 절차에 따라 환자와 병원 자율로"[URL]
- "'존엄사' 소송, 대법원 간다"[URL]
- "김수환 추기경 남긴 '생명존중' 기린다"[URL]
- Gauthier DM, "The Preference for Care near the End of Life scale Development and Validation", Research in Nursing & Health, 24, pp.298~306 (2001)
- 김신미, "노인과 성인이 인식하는 ‘좋은 죽음’에 대한 연구", 한국노년학, 23(3), pp.95~110 (2003), 한국노년학회
- Kim S, "Korean nurses' attitudes to good and bad death, life-sustaining treatment and advance directives", Nursing Ethics, 10(6), pp.624~637 (2003)
- 통계청, , ~ (2007)
- 한국보건사회연구원, , ~ (2002)