본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학생의 소집단 물리 문제풀이 협업 활동에서 나타난 언어적 상호작용 유형의 특징

Characteristics of Verbal Interaction Types in Small Group Collaborative Physics Problem-Solving Activity of College Students

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to typify the patterns of interaction and analyze the characteristics of verbal interaction while solving physics problems in small groups. As a result, the interaction patterns appeared as dominant-type, partial participation-type and all participation-type, according to the number of members who practically contributed to for solving problems. In the dominant-type, the statement frequency and the rate of high level statement are low. The partly participation-type show higher figures than the one way-type in the statement frequency, the rate of high level statement. On the other hand, in the all participation-type, the statement frequency and the rate of high level statement are very high, especially in the Positive Expansion and Logical Argument. Because the type have a communication of higher quality than the other types.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to typify the patterns of interaction and analyze the characteristics of verbal interaction while solving physics problems in small groups. As a result, the interaction patterns appeared as dominant-type, partial participation-type and all participation-type, according to the number of members who practically contributed to for solving problems. In the dominant-type, the statement frequency and the rate of high level statement are low. The partly participation-type show higher figures than the one way-type in the statement frequency, the rate of high level statement. On the other hand, in the all participation-type, the statement frequency and the rate of high level statement are very high, especially in the Positive Expansion and Logical Argument. Because the type have a communication of higher quality than the other types.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Gilley, B. H, "Collaborative testing: Evidence of learning in a controlled in-class study of undergraduate students", Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(3), pp.83~91 (2014)
  2. Han, S. M, "Vygotsky and Education" (1999), Kyoyookbook
  3. Heller P, "Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2:Designing problems and structuring groups", American Journal of Physics, 60(7), pp.637~644 (1992)
  4. Heller, P, "Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving", American Journal of Physics, 60(7), pp.627~636 (1992)
  5. Jang, H, "Collaborative exams: Cheating? Or learning", American Journal of Physics, 85(3), pp.223~227 (2017)
  6. 전영석, "소집단 자유 탐구에서 나타나는 학생-학생 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국초등교육, 21(2), pp.227~246 (2010), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
  7. Kang, K.-H, "A study on the feature of small group discussion and the interaction types in middle school class", Korean Journal of Education Research, 25(1), pp.239~259 (2004)
  8. Kang, S, "Analysis of verbal interaction in small group discussion", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), pp.353~363 (2000)
  9. Kim, K. S, "The effects of cooperative CAI and reciprocal peer tutoring CAI in chemistry concept learning: Conceptual understanding and verbal interactions", Doctoral, pp.2005
  10. 김명희, "과학 탐구 활동에서 나타나는 과학영재들의 언어적 상호작용 유형 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(2), pp.333~342 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  11. 구양삼, "토론을 강조한 MBL실험수업에서 리더 유형에 따른 언어적 상호작용 특성", 대한화학회지, 50(6), pp.494~505 (2006), 대한화학회
  12. Kwahk, K. Y, "Social Network Analysis" (2017), Cheonglam
  13. 이현영, "사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), pp.660~670 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  14. 이민지, "논의기반 탐구(Argument-Based Inquiry) 과학수업에서 나타나는 중학생들의 논의과정 분석", 대한화학회지, 59(1), pp.78~87 (2015), 대한화학회[DOI]
  15. Lusk, M, "Collaborative testing to promote learning", Journal of Nursing Education, 42(3), pp.121~124 (2003)
  16. , 2015
  17. National Research Council (NRC), "Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century" (2012), The National Academies Press
  18. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "PISA 2015Assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving" (2017), OECD Publishing
  19. 박주영, "과학실험수업에서 포용적 리더가 모둠의 상호작용에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(1), pp.124~139 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  20. Rieger, G. W, "Examinations that support collaborative learning : The students’perspective", Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(4), pp.41~47 (2014)
  21. Shindler, J. V, "Greater than the sum of the parts? Examining the soundness of collaborative exams in Teacher Education Courses", Innovative Higher Education, 28(4), pp.273~283 (2004)
  22. Smith, M. K, "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions", Science, 323(5910), pp.122~124 (2009)
  23. 유지연, "이해와 검토 단계를 강조한 비유 실험 설계 전략을 활용한 탐구수업에서 나타나는 과학영재 사이의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(4), pp.671~685 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  24. Wieman, C. E, "Physics exams that promote collaborative learning", The Physics Teacher, 52(1), pp.51~53 (2014)
  25. Zimbardo, P. G, "Cooperative college examinations : More gain, less pain when students share information and grades", The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), pp.101~125 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)