본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학기술관련 사회적 쟁점에 대한 다문서 읽기에서 시선 이동

Eye Movements When Reading Multiple Documents about a Socio-Scientific Issue

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference between eye movements when reading multiple controversial documents about a socio-scientific issue according to prior beliefs. Multiple documents was based on two positions (belief-consistent & belief-inconsistent) about nuclear power generation. A set of data were collected from forty nine college and graduate students. The eye movement data of participants who read texts by presenting the two types of controversial documents for nuclear power generation were collected. The collected gaze data were analyzed by the difference of the total reading time, fixation count, fixation duration time. The difference gaze was analyzed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference between eye movements when reading multiple controversial documents about a socio-scientific issue according to prior beliefs. Multiple documents was based on two positions (belief-consistent & belief-inconsistent) about nuclear power generation. A set of data were collected from forty nine college and graduate students. The eye movement data of participants who read texts by presenting the two types of controversial documents for nuclear power generation were collected. The collected gaze data were analyzed by the difference of the total reading time, fixation count, fixation duration time. The difference gaze was analyzed.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Anmarkrud, Ø, "Multiple-documents literacy : Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents", Learning and Individual Differences, 30, pp.64~76 (2014)
  2. Boraston Z, "The application of eye-tracking technology in the study of autism", The Journal of Physiology, 15(3), pp.893~898 (2009)
  3. Braten, I, "When law students read multiple documents about global warming : Examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing", Instructional Science, 38, pp.635~6657 (2010)
  4. Britt, M. A, "Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes", pp.276~314 (2012), Cambridge University Press
  5. Bromme, R, "Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice", pp.163~193 (2009), Cambridge University Press
  6. Chall, J, "Stages of reading development" (1983), McGraw-Hill
  7. Chinn, C. A, "The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition : A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction", Review of Educational Research, 63, pp.1~49 (1993)
  8. 주인애, "생명공학과 관련된 사회적 쟁점에 대한 중학생들의 가치판단 및 의사결정 과정에서 드러난 가치 적용 방식 유형", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), pp.79~93 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  9. 김영현, "과학기술관련 사회쟁점(SSI)에 대한 고등학생들의 가치 판단과 의사결정 변화 양상 분석", 교과교육학연구, 21(5), pp.498~511 (2017), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  10. 권수희, "SSI-PCK 향상을 위한 교사교육이예비 과학교사들의 SSI 교육에 대한 이해 및 교수 효능감에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(21), pp.211~236 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  11. 이은항, "과학기술관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 교육 프로그램이 고등학생들의 도덕적 판단력과 SSI 추론 능력 함양에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(8), pp.219~237 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  12. Maggioni, L, "Adolescents' reading of multiple history texts: An interdisciplinary investigation of historical thinking, intertextual reading, and domain-specific epistemic beliefs", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2009)
  13. Mason, L, "Epistemic metacognition in context : Evaluating and learning online information", Metacognition and Learning, 5, pp.67~90 (2010)
  14. Nickerson, R. S, "Confirmation bias : A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises", Review of General Psychology, 2, pp.175~220 (1998)
  15. Richter, T, "Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information : A two-step model of validation", Educational Psychologist, 52(3), pp.148~166 (2017)
  16. Rouet, J. F, "The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning" (2006), Erlbaum
  17. Sadler, T. D, "Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (Vol. 39)" (2011), Springer
  18. The Public Deliberation Committee on Shin-Gori Nuclear Reactors No. 5 & 6, "Results of Participatory Surveys for Public Deliberation on Shin-Gori Nuclear Reactors No. 5 & 6", ~ (2017)
  19. Toulmin, E. S, "The uses of argument updated edition" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  20. van Strien, J. L. H, "Dealing with conflicting information from multiple nonlinear texts: Effects of prior attitudes", Computers in Human Behavior, 32, pp.101~111 (2014)
  21. van Strien, J. L. H, "How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web", Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp.245~252 (2016)
  22. Vosniadou, S, "Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change", Learning and Instruction, 4, pp.45~69 (1994)
  23. 양일호, "과학 관련 사회적 문제(SSI) 상황에서 반박자료와 감정이입상황에 따른 초등학생의 의사결정 변화", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 8(1), pp.66~75 (2015), 대한지구과학교육학회
  24. Yang, J. Y, "The Institute of Social Development and Political Research" (2017), Seoul National University
  25. Zeidler, D. L, "Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II", pp.697~726 (2014), Routledge
  26. Zeidler, D. L, "Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), pp.74~101 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)