부당행위계산부인의 특수관계인 범위에 관한 고찰
A Study on the range of related parties of the rejection of unfair act and calculation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Taxation is limited to the results of the people's property. Thus, tax evasion is a problem that happens in any times. This practice needs to be banned. This problem is especially the rejection of unfair act and calculation of Corporation Tax Law. The Denial of the improper transaction and calculation between the persons who have special relationships in Corporation Tax Law is the most important method to prohibit tax evasion. But Legitimate and effective business practices, so that the ex-post regulatory requirements, the rule of the rejection of unfair act and calculation need to be strictly construed. Article 87 of enforcement ordinance of Corporate Tax Law concerning the scope of related parties, there has been conflict of opinion. In this regard there are conflicts of one side relationship theory and two sides relationship theory. The Supreme Court had in a point of view of two sides relationship theory in the past. But the Supreme Court recently changed its opinion to one side relationship theory. The main reason is the principle of strict interpretation and prohibition of analogical interpretation. Considering the purpose of tax avoidance prohibition, two sides relationship theory is thought to be reasonable. Recently revised enforcement ordinance of Corporate Tax Law and The Basic Law for National Taxes were based on the two sides relationship theory. I think the legislation is valid.
Abstract
Taxation is limited to the results of the people's property. Thus, tax evasion is a problem that happens in any times. This practice needs to be banned. This problem is especially the rejection of unfair act and calculation of Corporation Tax Law. The Denial of the improper transaction and calculation between the persons who have special relationships in Corporation Tax Law is the most important method to prohibit tax evasion. But Legitimate and effective business practices, so that the ex-post regulatory requirements, the rule of the rejection of unfair act and calculation need to be strictly construed. Article 87 of enforcement ordinance of Corporate Tax Law concerning the scope of related parties, there has been conflict of opinion. In this regard there are conflicts of one side relationship theory and two sides relationship theory. The Supreme Court had in a point of view of two sides relationship theory in the past. But the Supreme Court recently changed its opinion to one side relationship theory. The main reason is the principle of strict interpretation and prohibition of analogical interpretation. Considering the purpose of tax avoidance prohibition, two sides relationship theory is thought to be reasonable. Recently revised enforcement ordinance of Corporate Tax Law and The Basic Law for National Taxes were based on the two sides relationship theory. I think the legislation is valid.
참고문헌 (42)
- 구욱서, "사법과 세법" (2010), 유로
- 김성수, "세법-조세법과 공법원리-" (2003), 법문사
- 황남석, "법인세법론" (2014), 광교
- 김재길, "세법학이론" (2008), 박영사
- 율촌 조세판례연구회, "조세판례연구Ⅲ" (2013), 세경사
- 이동식, "일반조세법" (2013), 준커뮤니케이션즈
- 이창희, "세법강의" (2014), 박영사
- 이태로, "조세법강의" (2014), 박영사
- 임승순, "조세법" (2014), 박영사
- 장재식, "조세법" (1995), 서울대학교출판부
- 정병용, "민법과 세법" (2011), 영화조세통람
- 한국세법학회, "세법판례백선" (2005), 박영사
- 金斗炯, "租稅法의 解釋論에 관한 硏究", 박사, 법학, pp.1996
- 김두형, "영국판례에 있어서 조세법의 해석방법과 조세회피의 관계에 관한 고찰" (2008), 영화 조세통람
- 김완석, "稅法上 特殊關係人의 問題點과 改善方案", 중앙법학, 7(1), pp.101~137 (2005), 중앙법학회
- 김주택, "현행 법인세법상 부당행위계산부인에 관한 연구", 경영교육연구, (31) (2003), 한국경영교육학회
- 김주석, "2011년 법인세법 및 소득세법 판례 회고", 조세법연구, 18(1), pp.397~423 (2012), 한국세법학회[DOI]
- 김중곤, "세법상 부당행위계산 부인의 요건과 효과", 법조, 54(8), pp.58~102 (2005), 법조협회
- 김학태, "법률해석의 한계 -판례에서 나타난 법해석방법론에 대한 비판적 고찰-", 외법논집, (22), pp.177~206 (2006), 법학연구소
- 김현채, "법인세법에 있어서 부당행위계산의 부인", 법조, 34(5) (1985)
- 민태욱, "조세법의 해석론", 행정법연구, 15(15), pp.355~372 (2006), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 백승재, "부당행위계산부인규정에 있어 특수관계자의 범위", 계간세무사, (131) (2011)
- 신만중, "이중과세와 부당행위계산부인 -비상장주식의 저가양도 및 이에 관한 대법원 2003.5.13. 선고 2002두12458 판결을 중심으로-", 조세와 법, 3(특별) (2010)
- 이동식, "조세회피행위 방지와 부당행위계산부인제도", 세무학연구, 25(2), pp.65~92 (2008), 한국세무학회
- 이동식, "조세법상 엄격해석원칙의 타당성 검토", 조세법연구, 17(3), pp.90~127 (2011), 한국세법학회
- 이창희, "조세법 연구 방법론", 서울대학교 법학, 46(2), pp.1~35 (2005), 법학연구소
- 정병문, "법인세법상 부당행위계산부인 : 판례를 중심으로", 사법논집, 38 (2004)
- 정병수, "특수관계자 및 관연개념의 체계적 고찰 1", 회계와세무, 219 (1987)
- 정인진, "부당행위계산의 부인", 재판자료집, 61 (1993)
- 정준우, "현행 세법상 특수관계자 규정의 합리적 운용에 관한 고찰", 조세 학술논집, 15 (1999)
- 각 세법상 부당행위계산규정의 상충관계 해소를 위한 연구, "정지선", 한국조세연구소, ~ (2011)
- 金子 宏, "租税法" (2013), 弘文堂
- 增田 英敏, "リ-ガルマインド租稅法" (2013), 成文堂
- 中尾 巧, "稅務訴訟入門" (2011), 商事法務
- 水野 忠恒, "租税判例百選" (2011), 有斐閣
- 金子 尚弘, "同族会社の行為計算否認規定と対応的調整の必要性－所得税法 157条の適用に係る問題を中心として", 立命館法政論集, (10) (2012)
- 酒井 克彦, "同族会社の行為計算否認に係る対応的調整規定創設の意義", 税理, 49(14) (2006)
- 村井 正, "同族会社の行為計算の否認", 租税法研究, (4) (1977), 有斐閣
- 村井 泰人, "同族会社の行為計算否認規定に関する研究-所得税の負担を不当に減少させる結果となる行為又は計算について-", 税大論叢, (55) (2007)
- 松丸 憲司, "租税回避に対する法人税法132条等の行為計算否認規定のあり方", 税大論叢, (51) (2006)
- 田中 治, "同族会社の行為計算否認規定の発動要件と課税処分取消訴訟", 税法学, (546) (2001)
- 中江 博行, "所得税法157条" (2009), 租稅爭訟, 靑林書院