회사법상 내부통제제도의 법적 개선방안
The Legal Reform Measure of the Internal Control System in Company Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After a unified concept was formed in the report of COSO, the USA, the most developed country in internal control system throughout the world, based on an independent act which is similar to Model Business Corporation Act (MBCA) and SOX Act, expressly stipulated the basic conditions with regard to internal control amid it, thus strengthening internal control. In contrast, there are not perfect legal provisions on internal control for Korean companies. Korean internal control system is only aimed at financial companies; while general companies have the provisions on internal control in External Audit Act and the contents related to financial reports; law-abiding control criterion and compliance officer system were only listed in the amendment of Commercial Law in April 2011. That is to say, internal control system only exists in Commercial Law, Financial Regulation Law, External Audit Act as well as the provisions of financial supervision organ and the laws and regulations of self-discipline supervision organ dispersedly. The laws related to finance have included internal control criterion and compliance officer system. In the amended Commercial Law, compared with compliance officer system, compliance officer system has been strengthened at the level of internal control in accordance with the laws related to finance. Therefore, different from financial enterprises, general enterprises don’t have all-round control system. The internal control system in listed companies hasn’t been introduced uniformly; while the law-abiding control, financial report (accounting) control and publicity control related to law-abiding volunteers are listed in the provisions of Commercial Law, External Audit Act and exchange respectively and have been implemented; as a result, many problems on low efficiency have been caused. So the internal control system which is contained in various laws including law-abiding control system dispersedly must be stipulated uniformly. However, in the short run, current systems shall be maintained for law-abiding supervisors system for financial enterprises as well as internal accounting control system and compliance officer system in External Audit Act. Nevertheless, in the long run, just as internal control system is not implemented additionally for financial enterprises in Japan and the USA, in view of the provisions of Commercial Law in Korea, a unified form is the best for internal control system. But what is more important is that even if internal control system is improved, it can’t be definitely guaranteed, either. We must realize the important fact that we need to provide reasonable guarantee for internal control system. Therefore, even if we have established internal control system, we still need to make long-term efforts to improve internal control while supervising internal control organ.
Abstract
After a unified concept was formed in the report of COSO, the USA, the most developed country in internal control system throughout the world, based on an independent act which is similar to Model Business Corporation Act (MBCA) and SOX Act, expressly stipulated the basic conditions with regard to internal control amid it, thus strengthening internal control. In contrast, there are not perfect legal provisions on internal control for Korean companies. Korean internal control system is only aimed at financial companies; while general companies have the provisions on internal control in External Audit Act and the contents related to financial reports; law-abiding control criterion and compliance officer system were only listed in the amendment of Commercial Law in April 2011. That is to say, internal control system only exists in Commercial Law, Financial Regulation Law, External Audit Act as well as the provisions of financial supervision organ and the laws and regulations of self-discipline supervision organ dispersedly. The laws related to finance have included internal control criterion and compliance officer system. In the amended Commercial Law, compared with compliance officer system, compliance officer system has been strengthened at the level of internal control in accordance with the laws related to finance. Therefore, different from financial enterprises, general enterprises don’t have all-round control system. The internal control system in listed companies hasn’t been introduced uniformly; while the law-abiding control, financial report (accounting) control and publicity control related to law-abiding volunteers are listed in the provisions of Commercial Law, External Audit Act and exchange respectively and have been implemented; as a result, many problems on low efficiency have been caused. So the internal control system which is contained in various laws including law-abiding control system dispersedly must be stipulated uniformly. However, in the short run, current systems shall be maintained for law-abiding supervisors system for financial enterprises as well as internal accounting control system and compliance officer system in External Audit Act. Nevertheless, in the long run, just as internal control system is not implemented additionally for financial enterprises in Japan and the USA, in view of the provisions of Commercial Law in Korea, a unified form is the best for internal control system. But what is more important is that even if internal control system is improved, it can’t be definitely guaranteed, either. We must realize the important fact that we need to provide reasonable guarantee for internal control system. Therefore, even if we have established internal control system, we still need to make long-term efforts to improve internal control while supervising internal control organ.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김강수, "내부통제와 준법지원인제도", 중앙법학, 13(2), pp.285~318 (2011), 중앙법학회
- 김강수, "會社 內部統制制度 發展을 위한 法的 改善方案", 박사, 법학과 상사법전공, pp.2012
- 김건식, "법적 시각에서 본 내부통제", BFL, (4) (2004)
- 김경석, "내부통제제도에 관한 연구", 박사, 상사법, pp.2010
- 박세화, "효과적인 내부통제 체제 구축을 위한 입법적 과제", 재산법연구, 23(2), pp.381~417 (2006), 한국재산법학회
- 서완석, "내부통제와 준법감시인제도", 기업법연구, 23(4), pp.289~330 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 서헌제, "상법강의(상) 제2판" (2007), 법문사
- 안수현, "내부통제의 회사법제 정비를 위한 검토", 상사판례연구, 20(2), pp.27~78 (2007), 한국상사판례학회
- 이범찬, "상법(상)", pp.775~ (2008)
- 이정숙, "미국 증권회사 컴플라이언스 프로그램의 이론적 배경과 특징", 증권법연구, 5(1), pp.221~253 (2004), 한국증권법학회
- 임중호, "監査委員會 監査의 現狀과 課題", 중앙법학, 10(3), pp.141~171 (2008), 중앙법학회
- 정대, "美國의 株式會社의 內部統制制度와 理事의 義務에 관한 硏究", 비교사법, 12(4), pp.369~423 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
- 최수정, "기업의 내부통제제도 확립을 위한 법적 개선방안", 박사, 법학, pp.2010
- 최승재, "會社內 內部統制機關의 再構成과 代案的 設計", 상사판례연구, 22(3), pp.27~61 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
- 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법(주석서Ⅰ)" (2009), 박영사
- 상장법인의 내부통제제도 법제화 및 KRX의 바람직한 내부통제시스템 구축을 위한 연구, "한국증권법학회", 한국증권거래소, ~ (2008)
- Internal Control-Integrated Framework, "Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission", COSO, ~ (1992)
- Guidance on Monitoring Internal Control Systems (2009), , ~ (2009)
