지식재산권법상 유전자원 관련 전통지식 보호에 관한 연구
A Study on Protection of Traditional Knowledge related to Genetic Resources in Intellectual Property Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In developed countries, there have been many cases that companies get benefited by applying for a patent using traditional knowledge related to genetic resources. However, the problem that the companies do not return their profits to the natives or countries originally having genetic resources, as known as “Bio-piracy”, has become an important issue. Although “Nagoya Protocol” was adopted to get this problem solved, Bio-piracy is still ongoing. Current IPR system includes Patent, Utility Model Act, Copyright, Trademark, and Design Law, Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. However, there is a certain limit to the protection of intellectual property rights that traditional knowledge related to genetic resources can insist in existing system. Especially, in case of traditional knowledge, it is virtually impossible to meet patent requirements of industrial applicability, novelty, the inventive step. In this regard, sui generis system is needed to be introduced in developing countries. Also, regarding mandatory disclosure of source, developed and developing countries have different views each other. In China and India, there are provisions for the disclosure of source in 「patent law」. However, it is necessary to discuss in terms of conflicts in the Trips Agreement article 27 and Nagoya Protocol. Like Shiseido and Sacha Inchi cases, it is frequent that beneficiaries just revoke the existing patent. In this regard, it is needed to prepare a plan for intellectual property litigation and establish a plan for distributing legitimate interests. Especially, Korea is in a position that takes advantage of those resources which implies that we should be aware of a huge impact this action would have in cosmetic industry as well as in a variety of industries. As discussed above, there are some limits on protection of traditional knowledge related to genetic resources in intellectual property law. So that, it is desirable to discuss on “sui generis system” for our country’s benefits.
Abstract
In developed countries, there have been many cases that companies get benefited by applying for a patent using traditional knowledge related to genetic resources. However, the problem that the companies do not return their profits to the natives or countries originally having genetic resources, as known as “Bio-piracy”, has become an important issue. Although “Nagoya Protocol” was adopted to get this problem solved, Bio-piracy is still ongoing. Current IPR system includes Patent, Utility Model Act, Copyright, Trademark, and Design Law, Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. However, there is a certain limit to the protection of intellectual property rights that traditional knowledge related to genetic resources can insist in existing system. Especially, in case of traditional knowledge, it is virtually impossible to meet patent requirements of industrial applicability, novelty, the inventive step. In this regard, sui generis system is needed to be introduced in developing countries. Also, regarding mandatory disclosure of source, developed and developing countries have different views each other. In China and India, there are provisions for the disclosure of source in 「patent law」. However, it is necessary to discuss in terms of conflicts in the Trips Agreement article 27 and Nagoya Protocol. Like Shiseido and Sacha Inchi cases, it is frequent that beneficiaries just revoke the existing patent. In this regard, it is needed to prepare a plan for intellectual property litigation and establish a plan for distributing legitimate interests. Especially, Korea is in a position that takes advantage of those resources which implies that we should be aware of a huge impact this action would have in cosmetic industry as well as in a variety of industries. As discussed above, there are some limits on protection of traditional knowledge related to genetic resources in intellectual property law. So that, it is desirable to discuss on “sui generis system” for our country’s benefits.
참고문헌 (36)
- 유전자원과 전통지식 법제 연구, "박종원", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2013)
- 윤선희, "지적재산권법 제14정판" (2014), 세창출판사
- 오승택, "특허법 제2판" (2014), 박문각
- 이기성, "중국 특허법" (2014), 세창출판사
- 이해완, "저작권법 제2판(전면개정판)" (2012), 박영사
- 나고야 의정서 발효가 국내 바이오산업에 미치는 영향, "강경남", ISSUE&FOCUS on IP, ~ (2014)
- 권보경, "전통지식의 권리보호에 관한 법적 고찰 : 전통식품을 중심으로", 석사, 법학과 상사법전공, pp.2013
- 김병일, "유전자원 및 전통지식의 보호와 지식재산권에 관한 연구", 법제연구, (26), pp.143~168 (2004), 한국법제연구원
- 박덕병, "전통지식 권리보호를 위한각국의 독자적인 시스템 전략분석", 농촌경제, 27(3), pp.131~149 (2004), 재단법인 한국농촌경제연구원
- 해양유전자원의 접근 및 이익공유에 대한 국가대응방안 연구-생물 다양성협약을 중심으로-, "박수진", 한국해양수산개발원, ~ (2008)
- 박원석, "나고야의정서의 협상과정 및 핵심쟁점에 관한 연구", 중앙법학, 13(4), pp.585~640 (2011), 중앙법학회
- 유럽연합의 전통지식 및 유전자원에 대한 지식재산권화와 법적 보호, "박원석", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2013)
- 박재원, "전통식품의 권리보호 방안에 관한 연구", 문화미디어엔터테인먼트법, 8(1), pp.77~108 (2014), 법학연구원 문화.미디어.엔터테인먼트법연구소
- 보건복지부, "나고야 의정서가 화장품업계에 미치는 영향 예상", 보건복지부 공청회 자료 (2012)
- 비교법, "유전자원 및 전통지식의 보호에 대한 국제적 보호와 한계", 비교법연구, 8(1) (2007), 동국대학교비교법문화연구소
- 손세정, "전통지식으로서 유전자원의 보호에 관한 연구", 의생명과학과 법, 1 (2009), 원광대학교 법학연구소
- 유예리, "생물유전자원의 접근 및 이익의 공평한 공유(ABS) 국제레짐에 대응한 중국의 법제와 정책", 국제법학회논총, 56(3), pp.203~231 (2011), 대한국제법학회
- 유예리, "중국의 유전자원 및 전통지식에 대한 지식재산권적 보호제도의 TRIPS협정과의 합치성에 관한 연구", 국제경제법연구, 11(2), pp.79~114 (2013), 한국국제경제법학회
- 해외 생물자원의 전통지식의 지속가능한 활용전략 연구, "오일찬", 한국환경정책⋅평가연구원, ~ (2013)
- 이석영, "新 유전자원 가치論", RDA Interrobang, (28) (2011), 농촌진흥청
- 정진국제특허법률사무소, "전통지식 및 유전자원 국제 논의 대응 전문가 포럼 주제발표-유전자원 출처공개 특허요건화의 국제 사례-", ~ (2011)
- 전통지식 및 유전자원 국제 논의 대응 전문가 포럼 주제발표-전통지식⋅유전자원의 적극적 보호방식 및 관련현황(새로운 법 제도를 통한 보호 현황)-, "김순웅", ~ (2011)
- 제주도의 지적재산권 보호자원 실태조사 및 정책 연구, "표명환", 제주발전연구원, ~ (2014)
- 신지식재산의 동향분석 및 법적보호방안 연구, "한국지식재산연구원", ~ (2011)
- 전통지식 관련 국제적 분쟁양태 및 효과적 대응을 위한 연구, "한국지식재산연구원", ~ (2013)
- 전통지식 및 유전자원에 대한 지재권적 보호가 국내산업에 미치는 영향분석 및 대응전략 연구, "한국지식재산연구원", ~ (2007)
- "환경부 보도자료, “생물다양성 협약 부속 나고야의정서, 이행 본격 준비”, 2014. 10. 14", ~ (2014)
- 황종환, "전통지식보호에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2005
- 생물다양성, 화장품 산업의 새로운 도전과 기회, "ABS 산업지원센터", ~ (2013)
- Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property, "Carlos M Correa", The Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO), ~ (2001)
- "ABS 관련 용어", 농업유전자원정보센터[URL]
- "한국경제, “‘생물자원 싸움’ 시작…제약⋅화장품 업계 ‘긴장’”, 2014. 10. 16.", ~ (2014)
- "지식재산동향"[URL]
- "WIPO"[URL]
- "WIPO"[URL]