공정거래 관련 분쟁의 피해구제 활성화를 위한 조정제도 확대 방안 고찰
A study on the Enlargement Proposal of the Mediation Regime in order to Enhance Damage Relief regarding Fair Trade Disputes
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean judicial procedure has limitation to gain damage relief. It is very difficult to prove evidence of loss caused to the parties entitled to compensation. Also, injured parties suffered in unfair trade practices are often too small to make it cost-effective for individual parties to bring claims for compensation. On the other hands, the Mediation system could obtain fair compensation for minimal cost and effort. The mediation system could provide that businesses can gain access to compensation more quickly, easily and without costs of litigation. However, the regulation about meditation system in the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act is not permitted to apply to the mediation process when government authority is ongoing investigation or where an infringement decision already been made by the authority. But if these cases could use the mediation system, the parties can get their compensation more easily and effectively than litigation system. Moreover, competition law infringements tend to be committed by dominant parties. If the dominant parties abuse their position of market strength, the suffer parties are hard to bring a suit or apply to the mediation system. So, the collective dispute mediation regime is needed to expand. Therefore, in order to enhance damage relief regarding Fair Trade disputes cost-efficient manner, the mediation system on the competition Act should be improved more expanded.
Abstract
The Korean judicial procedure has limitation to gain damage relief. It is very difficult to prove evidence of loss caused to the parties entitled to compensation. Also, injured parties suffered in unfair trade practices are often too small to make it cost-effective for individual parties to bring claims for compensation. On the other hands, the Mediation system could obtain fair compensation for minimal cost and effort. The mediation system could provide that businesses can gain access to compensation more quickly, easily and without costs of litigation. However, the regulation about meditation system in the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act is not permitted to apply to the mediation process when government authority is ongoing investigation or where an infringement decision already been made by the authority. But if these cases could use the mediation system, the parties can get their compensation more easily and effectively than litigation system. Moreover, competition law infringements tend to be committed by dominant parties. If the dominant parties abuse their position of market strength, the suffer parties are hard to bring a suit or apply to the mediation system. So, the collective dispute mediation regime is needed to expand. Therefore, in order to enhance damage relief regarding Fair Trade disputes cost-efficient manner, the mediation system on the competition Act should be improved more expanded.
참고문헌 (34)
- 공정거래위원회, "공정거래백서" (2015)
- 공정거래위원회, "공정거래위원회 30년사, 제2권" (2011)
- 공정거래관련 분쟁의 조정을 통한 피해구제, "김건식", 한국공정거래조정원, ~ (2014)
- 동의의결제도의 규범적 정당성 및 실효성에 관한 연구, "이봉의", 한국공정거래조정원, ~ (2015)
- 이선희, "독점규제법상 부당한 공동행위에 대한 손해배상청구" (2013), 경인문화사
- 이호영, "독점규제법" (2013), 홍문사
- 공정거래법 위반으로 인한 손해배상소송에서 손해액 산정 및 조사･확정 기준에 관한 연구, "홍대식", 한국공정거래조정원, ~ (2013)
- 권오승, "독점규제 및 공정거래관련법의 집행시스템", 서울대학교 법학, 51(4), pp.211~228 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김건식, "공정거래관련 집단분쟁조정제도에 관한 연구", 서울법학, 21(3), pp.67~98 (2014), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- 김건식, "공정거래 자율준수 프로그램의 제도분석과 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 17(2), pp.319~348 (2014), 법학연구소
- 김윤수, "공정거래법상 동의의결제의 도입 및 향후 운용방향", 경쟁저널, (160) (2012), 한국공정경쟁연합회
- 남진권, "우리나라의 행정형조정에 의한 분쟁해결제도의 문제점과 활성화 방안", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.31~71 (2008), 법학연구소
- 박영진, "불공정거래행위에 대한 규제 분석", 선진상사법률연구, (68), pp.145~179 (2014), 법무부
- 배진철, "공정거래 분쟁조정제도에 대하여", 경쟁저널, (185) (2016)
- 장재옥, "징벌적 손해배상 개념의 수용가능성", 法學論文集, 39(3), pp.81~115 (2015), 법학연구원
- 주진열, "독점규제 손해배상소송에 있어 실증경제분석의 규범적 통제와 법제도적 개선방안", 서울대학교 경쟁법센터 제3차 법·정책 세미나 (2011)
- 주진열, "최근 공정거래관련 집단소송제 도입을 위한 공정거래법개정안에 대한 고찰", 법학논총, 29(4), pp.555~577 (2012), 법학연구소
- 신영수, "경쟁법의 사적 집행 활성화; 전제와 현실, 그리고 과제", 법학논고, (36), pp.169~194 (2011), 법학연구원
- 신영수, "현행 공정거래조정제도의 미비점 및 실효성 제고를 위한 보완 방안", 중앙법학, 12(2), pp.403~438 (2010), 중앙법학회
- 이선희, "독점규제법 위반으로 인한 손해배상소송에서 손해액 산정과 손해액 인정제도", 경쟁법연구, 26, pp.203~250 (2012), 한국경쟁법학회
- 이봉의, "질서정책적 과제로서의 경쟁 -과거와 미래", 경쟁법연구, 23, pp.194~218 (2011), 한국경쟁법학회
- 윤성운, "남천 권오승 교수 정년기념논문집 ｢시장경제와 사회조화｣" (2015)
- 조성국, "동의의결제 운용에 대한 제언", 경쟁저널, (160) (2012), 한국공정경쟁연합회
- 최난설헌, "공정거래법상 집단소송제 도입을 위한 논의와 최근 동향", 선진상사법률연구, (63), pp.80~110 (2013), 법무부
- 최요섭, "The Recent Enforcement of Competition Law Damages Actions in the European Union", EU연구, (41), pp.3~32 (2015), EU연구소[DOI]
- 홍대식, "남천 권오승 교수 정년기념논문집 ｢시장경제와 사회조화｣" (2015)
- 홍대식, "공정거래법상 징벌적 손해배상 제도 도입에 대한 비판적 검토", 법과 기업 연구, 5(2), pp.73~120 (2015), 법학연구소
- 홍명수, "독점규제법상 집단분쟁해결제도의 도입 검토", 경쟁저널, (164) (2012)
- Bruno Augustin, "The CMA’s voluntary redress scheme has a major flaw", Competition Law Insight, (20), pp.4~ (2015)
- Competition and Markets Authority, "Guidance on the approval of voluntary redress schemes for infringements of competition law", CMA40, ~ (2015)
- Department for Business Innovation & Skills(BIS), "Private Actions in Competition Law: A Consultation on Options for Reform-Government Response", ~ (2013)
- "DIRECTIVE 2014", 104, pp.2014, ~
- Laurel J. Harbour, "The Emerging European Class Action: Expanding Multi-Party Litigation to A Shrinking World", The Practical Litigator (2007), American Law Institute-American Bar Association Committee on Continuing Professional Education
- Private Actions in Competition Law: Effective Redress for Consumers and Businesses, "OFT", ~, pp.OFT 916 (2007)