본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생명윤리학의 방법론 小考

A Study on the Methods of Bioethics

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Nowadays there are so many approaches to bioethics including traditional deontology and utilitarianism, modern principlism and casuistry as well as virtue bioethics, care bioethics, narrative bioethics, feminist bioethics, communitarian bioethics, pragmatism bioethics, phenomenological bioethics etc. Although the methods of bioethics would never resolve every legal problem resulting from bio-science and bio-technologies, they could provide methodological basis for finding a way to resolve the problems. The methods for bioethics are not going to differ from those for ethics or moral philosophy in general. Like another applied ethics, main ethical theories of bioethics are not different from those of ethics in general. Above all, deontological theories and utilitarian theories are intermingles with each other in bioethics. The structure & process of resolution of bioethical problems is also analogous to that of another applied ethics or practical ethics. The resolution mechanism of bioethical problems will not work by simple case study without appeal to ethical theories. But mere application of ethical theories to particular cases can not resolve bioethical problems properly. In these respects, every method in bioethics has it's strengths and weaknesses. Futhermore some approaches are overlapped, converged and complementary to each other. Nearly all bioethicists reject the extreme approaches in favor of more moderate views that concede much to the other camp. The methodological debate has now moved to a more mature and reflective stage, in which confrontation has begun to be superseded by accommondation and reconciliation.

Abstract

Nowadays there are so many approaches to bioethics including traditional deontology and utilitarianism, modern principlism and casuistry as well as virtue bioethics, care bioethics, narrative bioethics, feminist bioethics, communitarian bioethics, pragmatism bioethics, phenomenological bioethics etc. Although the methods of bioethics would never resolve every legal problem resulting from bio-science and bio-technologies, they could provide methodological basis for finding a way to resolve the problems. The methods for bioethics are not going to differ from those for ethics or moral philosophy in general. Like another applied ethics, main ethical theories of bioethics are not different from those of ethics in general. Above all, deontological theories and utilitarian theories are intermingles with each other in bioethics. The structure & process of resolution of bioethical problems is also analogous to that of another applied ethics or practical ethics. The resolution mechanism of bioethical problems will not work by simple case study without appeal to ethical theories. But mere application of ethical theories to particular cases can not resolve bioethical problems properly. In these respects, every method in bioethics has it's strengths and weaknesses. Futhermore some approaches are overlapped, converged and complementary to each other. Nearly all bioethicists reject the extreme approaches in favor of more moderate views that concede much to the other camp. The methodological debate has now moved to a more mature and reflective stage, in which confrontation has begun to be superseded by accommondation and reconciliation.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 권복규, "생명윤리와 법" (2005), 이화여대 출판부
  2. 박은정, "생명공학시대의 법과 윤리" (2000), 이화여대 출판부
  3. 이상목, "생명윤리학의 방법론", 국민윤리학논집, 14 (2001)
  4. 최경석, "생명윤리에서의 넓은 반성적 평형과 판단력", 법철학연구, 11(1), pp.65~84 (2008), 한국법철학회
  5. Arras, J., "“A Case Approach”, A Companion to Bioethics" (1998), Blackwell
  6. Beauchamp, T., "“The Role of Principles in Practical Ethics”, Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics" (1996), U. of Toronto P.
  7. Beauchamp, T., "Principles of Biomedical Ethics" (1979), OUP
  8. Bentham, J., "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation", ~
  9. Boyle, J., "“An absolute rule approach”, A Companion to Bioethics" (1998), Blackwell
  10. Childress, J., "“Methods in Bioethics”, The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics" (2007), OUP
  11. Clouser, K., "A Critique of Principlism", Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15 (1990)
  12. Daniels, N., "“Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Practice”, Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics" (1996), University of Toronto Press
  13. Dolgin, J., "Bioethics and the Law, 2.ed" (2009), Aspen
  14. Düwell, M., "Bioethik" (2008), Metzler
  15. Engelhardt, H.T., "Foundations of Bioethics" (1986), OUP
  16. Fletcher, J., "Morals and Medicine" (1954), Princeton UP
  17. Frankena, W., "Ethics 2nd ed" (1973), Prentice-Hall
  18. Gert, B., "Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals" (1997), OUP
  19. Hare, R.M., "“Methods of Bioethics”, Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics" (1996), University of Toronto Press
  20. Herring, J., "Medical Law and Ethics" (2006), OUP
  21. Jackson, E., "Medical Law" (2006), OUP
  22. Jecker, N., "Bioethics. An Introduction to the History, Methods, and Practice" (2007), Jones and Barlett
  23. Jonsen, A., "The History of Bioethics as a Discipline”, Handbook of Bioethics" (2004), Kluwer
  24. Jonsen, A., "The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning" (1988), University of California Press
  25. Kant, I., "윤리형이상학 정초" (2005), 아카넷
  26. Khushf, G., "Handbook of Bioethics" (2004), Kluwer
  27. Kuhse, H., "A Companion to Bioethics" (1998), Blackwell
  28. MacIntyre, A., "After Virtue" (1981), Duckworth
  29. Manning, R., "“A Care Approach”, A Companion to Bioethics" (1998), Blackwell
  30. Nelson, H., "“Four Narrative Approaches to Bioethics”, Handbook of Bioethics" (2004), Kluwer
  31. Oakley, J., "“A virtue ethics approach”, A Companion to Bioethics" (1998), Blackwell
  32. Pattinson, S., "Medical Law and Ethics" (2006), Sweet&Maxwell
  33. Paul, E., "Bioethics" (2002), Cambridge UP
  34. Rachels, J., "“Ethical theory and bioethics”, A Companion to Bioethics" (1998), Blackwell
  35. Rawls, J., "A Theory of Justice" (1971), Harvard UP
  36. Ross, W.D., "The Right and The Good" (1930), OUP
  37. Shanner, L., "“Bioethics through the Back Door: Phenomenology, Narratives, and Insight into Infertility”, Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics" (1996), University of Toronto Press
  38. Smart, J.J.C., "”, Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2. ed" (2006), Thomson Gale
  39. Steinbock, B., "The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics" (2007), OUP
  40. Sumner, L., "Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics" (1996), University of Toronto Press
  41. Veatch, R., "A Theory of Medical Ethics" (1981), Basic Books
  42. Walker, R., "“Bioethics”, Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2.ed, Vol. 1" (2006), Macmillan
  43. Winkler, E., "“Moral Philosophy and Bioethics: Contextualism versus the Paradigm Theory Bioethics”, Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics" (1996), University of Toronto Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)