본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

日本의 擔保不動産收益執行制度와 그 導入 重要性

The Secured Real Estate Profit Executive System in Japan and the Necessity of Introduction

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In 2003, japan established the secured real estate profit executive system in civil judgment enforcement law and reformed article 371 of the civil law to clarify a base of substantial law. In japan, a mortgagee′s traditional methods of redemption were the public auction procedure in civil judgment enforcement law and distress by surrogation on the secured real estate profit. but since 1990s, these two methods have proved limitation as the japan economy has lain in the doldrums. The secured real estate profit executive system is established as additional measure to cope with that problem. Now, the secured real estate profit executive system in Japan is not used actively and do mearly complementary function of the public auction procedure different from the original purpose. But in that a redemption through the public auction procedure is not always an effective and well-directed method, a complementary function of the secured real estate profit executive system can be a merit, as long as performing function properly, and from a viewpoint of diversification of method to executive of mortgage, usefulness of the secured real estate profit executive system is still. Unlike japan, a mortgagee′s method of redemption is only the public auction procedure in civil judgment enforcement law in Korea. In conclusion, in that there is the need to cope with delaying of the public auction procedure and there is no problem in an interpretation on article 359 of the Civil Law in relation to a nature of mortgage, the necessity of introduction of the secured real estate profit executive system can be recognized. However, as our article on surrogation in civil law differs from japan, when we review the need to introduce, when it comes to surrogation, there is not an actual profit to discuss. Together, when we introduce the secured real estate profit executive system in japan, matters to be attended to. First, we would use that system as complimentary measure of the public auction procedure, Second, using term, the mortgaged real estate profit executive system rather than that in japan law, and secured law system, Last, systems, applicating situations of germany, france as well as japan must be reviewed minutely. Feb. 2. 2009, the committee on an amendment of the civil law in Ministry of Justice was founded. This time, an amendment of the civil law is to be done by total 6 subcommittees. And an amendment of the mortgage system is placed on 5th subcommittee. In this amendment of the civil law, I expect that introduction of the Secured Real Estate Profit Executive System will be reviewed thoroughly.

Abstract

In 2003, japan established the secured real estate profit executive system in civil judgment enforcement law and reformed article 371 of the civil law to clarify a base of substantial law. In japan, a mortgagee′s traditional methods of redemption were the public auction procedure in civil judgment enforcement law and distress by surrogation on the secured real estate profit. but since 1990s, these two methods have proved limitation as the japan economy has lain in the doldrums. The secured real estate profit executive system is established as additional measure to cope with that problem. Now, the secured real estate profit executive system in Japan is not used actively and do mearly complementary function of the public auction procedure different from the original purpose. But in that a redemption through the public auction procedure is not always an effective and well-directed method, a complementary function of the secured real estate profit executive system can be a merit, as long as performing function properly, and from a viewpoint of diversification of method to executive of mortgage, usefulness of the secured real estate profit executive system is still. Unlike japan, a mortgagee′s method of redemption is only the public auction procedure in civil judgment enforcement law in Korea. In conclusion, in that there is the need to cope with delaying of the public auction procedure and there is no problem in an interpretation on article 359 of the Civil Law in relation to a nature of mortgage, the necessity of introduction of the secured real estate profit executive system can be recognized. However, as our article on surrogation in civil law differs from japan, when we review the need to introduce, when it comes to surrogation, there is not an actual profit to discuss. Together, when we introduce the secured real estate profit executive system in japan, matters to be attended to. First, we would use that system as complimentary measure of the public auction procedure, Second, using term, the mortgaged real estate profit executive system rather than that in japan law, and secured law system, Last, systems, applicating situations of germany, france as well as japan must be reviewed minutely. Feb. 2. 2009, the committee on an amendment of the civil law in Ministry of Justice was founded. This time, an amendment of the civil law is to be done by total 6 subcommittees. And an amendment of the mortgage system is placed on 5th subcommittee. In this amendment of the civil law, I expect that introduction of the Secured Real Estate Profit Executive System will be reviewed thoroughly.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 강대성, (2008), 삼영사
  2. 곽윤직, "물권법" (2006), 박영사
  3. 김상수, "일본의 담보법제의 개정", 비교사법, 11(1), pp.31~55 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
  4. 김인유, "일본의 개정담보법상 부동산수익에 대한 저당권의 효력", 비교사법, 12(1) (2005), 한국비교사법학회
  5. 柳昌昊, "日本의 改正 擔保法과 우리 擔保法改正의 課題-民法改正案 중 擔保權規定을 中心으로-", 법제연구, (25), pp.269~301 (2003), 한국법제연구원
  6. 류창호, "담보부동산 수익집행제도에 관한 연구", 법제연구, (33), pp.319~343 (2007), 한국법제연구원
  7. 법무부, "민법(재산편)개정 자료집" (2004)
  8. 법원행정처, (2003), 법원행정처
  9. 이시윤, "신민사집행법" (2005), 박영사
  10. 이영준, "물권법" (2002), 박영사
  11. 윤부찬, "담보부동산 수익관리제도에 관한 연구 -미국과 일본 제도의 비교를 중심으로-", 법학연구, 19(3), pp.53~84 (2009), 법학연구원
  12. 古賀政治, "擔保不動産收益執行(その1 in NBL" (2006), 商事法務
  13. 谷口園惠, "東京地裁における平成15年改正擔保·執行法の運用狀況", 金法, (1720) (2004)
  14. 谷口園惠, "第19回不動産法セミナ - 坪城15年擔保·執行法改正の檢證" (2006), 有斐閣
  15. 堀龍兒, "擔保不動産收益執行制度-物上代位との關係 In 擔保制度の現代的展開 - 伊藤進先生古稀記念論文集" (2006), 日本評論社
  16. 近江幸治, "擔保物權法" (1998), 弘文堂
  17. 內海順太, "改正擔保·執行法の運用上の諸問題とユ-ザ-からみた問題點", 新民事執行實務, (4) (2006)
  18. 擔保法改正委員會, "抵當權法改正中間試案の公表(民法改正試案Vol.1)" (2002), 有斐閣
  19. 道垣內弘人, "擔保物權法 第2版" (2005), 有斐閣
  20. 三輪和雄, "東京地裁における平成15年改正擔保·執行法の運用狀況", 民事訴訟雜誌, (51) (2005), 民事訴訟法學會
  21. 上甲悌二, "借賃債權に對すゐ物上代位に代わゐ制度に關すゐ私案について" (2002), 有斐閣
  22. 生態長幸, "物上代位と收益管理" (2003), 有婓閣
  23. 石前喜久夫, "物權法" (1977), 日本評論社
  24. 松岡久和, "擔保執行法改正の槪要と問題點(上)", 金融法務事情, (1687) (2003), 金融財政事情硏究會
  25. 小林秀之, "擔保物權法" (2004), 弘文堂
  26. 我妻榮, "擔保物權法" (1968), 日本評論社
  27. 坂本寬, "大阪地方裁判所におけゐ平成15年改正擔保·執行法の檢證と擔保不動産收益執行の一考察" (2006), 判例タイムズ社
  28. 平野裕之, "執行·實行妨害" (2002), 有斐閣
  29. 黑田豊, "大阪地裁における平成15年改正擔保·執行法の運用狀況", 金法, (1728) (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)