복수노조 교섭창구단일화 제도의 주요 쟁점
Major Issues in the legal procedure for the single bargaining table
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The amendment of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act in 2010 has a significant influence on the Korean industrial relations enough to change the paradigm of the collective labour relations all at once as multiple trade unionism not only guarantees workers’ choice on trade union but also leads to the various cases in the collective labour relations. Therefore, it needs to review precise and proper interpretation of the labour law and seek to the legal alternatives, for trade union pluralism is closely related to the various legal issues. Although there are some views that the legal procedure for single bargaining table is the violation of the Constitution, it is necessary to try to solve the controversy on the violation of the Constitution through maximum guaranteeing the minor trade union the opportunity of participation in the bargaining. In relation to the procedure for determining the trade unions participating the single bargaining table, the trade unions participating the procedure for single bargaining table must be all the trade unions regardless of the type of organization considering the intent of the legal procedure for the single bargaining table. Bargaining unit should be set in the level of outside of the workplace in the view of the intent of securing the workers’ rights of organization, collective bargaining and collective action pursuant to the Constitution, the principle of the labor management autonomy, etc. Voluntary bargaining by the consent of the employer should be permitted in the case of satisfying the special requirement because the bargaining may infringe the procedure for the single bargaining table. First of all, when the two trade unions or more coexist, the trade unions can determine the representative for the collective bargaining with autonomy. If it fails, the trade union composed of a majority of the workers in a certain bargaining unit can negotiate and make a collective agreement for all the unions and workers in the bargaining unit. In case that the trade union organized of a majority of the workers does not exist, the trade union supported by the majority of workers must be elected under the supervision of the Labor relations Commission. If it is unsuccessful, the joint bargaining representative team can negotiate and make a collective agreement.
Abstract
The amendment of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act in 2010 has a significant influence on the Korean industrial relations enough to change the paradigm of the collective labour relations all at once as multiple trade unionism not only guarantees workers’ choice on trade union but also leads to the various cases in the collective labour relations. Therefore, it needs to review precise and proper interpretation of the labour law and seek to the legal alternatives, for trade union pluralism is closely related to the various legal issues. Although there are some views that the legal procedure for single bargaining table is the violation of the Constitution, it is necessary to try to solve the controversy on the violation of the Constitution through maximum guaranteeing the minor trade union the opportunity of participation in the bargaining. In relation to the procedure for determining the trade unions participating the single bargaining table, the trade unions participating the procedure for single bargaining table must be all the trade unions regardless of the type of organization considering the intent of the legal procedure for the single bargaining table. Bargaining unit should be set in the level of outside of the workplace in the view of the intent of securing the workers’ rights of organization, collective bargaining and collective action pursuant to the Constitution, the principle of the labor management autonomy, etc. Voluntary bargaining by the consent of the employer should be permitted in the case of satisfying the special requirement because the bargaining may infringe the procedure for the single bargaining table. First of all, when the two trade unions or more coexist, the trade unions can determine the representative for the collective bargaining with autonomy. If it fails, the trade union composed of a majority of the workers in a certain bargaining unit can negotiate and make a collective agreement for all the unions and workers in the bargaining unit. In case that the trade union organized of a majority of the workers does not exist, the trade union supported by the majority of workers must be elected under the supervision of the Labor relations Commission. If it is unsuccessful, the joint bargaining representative team can negotiate and make a collective agreement.
참고문헌 (22)
- 고용노동부, "2011년도 주요 업무추진계획", ~ (2010)
- 김철희, "복수노조 교섭창구 단일화의 법리적 문제점 및 노조환경의 변화", 노조법 개정과 노동운동의 대응 , 민주노총 긴급토론회 자료집, ~ (2010)
- 김형배, "노동법 제19판(전면개정증보판)" (2010), 박영사
- 노동부, "노조법 개정 설명자료", ~ (2010)
- 박종희, "복수노조하에서의 교섭창구 단일화", 고려법학, (36) (2001), 려대학교법학연구원
- 기업내 근로조건 결정의 법리, "박제성", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2010)
- 노동조합 및 노동관계조정법, "사법연수원", ~ (2010)
- 유성재, "2010년 개정 노동법에 대한 입법론적 평가", 노동법학, (34), pp.1~31 (2010), 한국노동법학회
- 이승길, "노조전임자와 복수노조와 관련한 노조법 개정과 그 패러다임 전환", 강원법학, 30, pp.271~308 (2010), 비교법학연구소
- 이승길, "복수노조와 관련한 노동법 개정과 그 패러다임 전환", 노사공포럼, 통권 : 18 (2010)
- 이승욱, "복수노조와 교섭창구단일화", 서울대학교 노동법연구회 2009년 추계 발표자료 (2009), 서울대학교 노동법연구회
- 이승욱, "복수노조설립금지제도의 위헌성", 노동법연구, (23), pp.195~240 (2007), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 이승욱, "기업별 복수노조와 교섭창구의 단일화", 노동법학, (21), pp.31~68 (2005), 한국노동법학회
- 이승욱, "교섭창구단일화제도의 쟁점 - 영국, 캐나다, 미국의 시사점과 다수교섭대표제도를 중심으로 -", 노동법연구, (17), pp.157~206 (2004), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 이정일, "개정 노조법의 주요 쟁점과 개선방안, In 한국의 노동, 어떻게 할 것인가? 3 : 복수노조와 전임자 급여" (2010), 서강대학교 출판부
- 이철수, "창구단일화-전임자 문제를 둘러싼 사회적 대화 과정과 결과", 산업관계연구, 20(2), pp.1~40 (2010), 한국고용노사관계학회
- 이철수, "복수노조ㆍ전임자 문제 어떻게 풀 것인가", 한국의 노동, 근원적 해법 모색을 위한 토론회 자료, ~ (2009)
- 이철수, "교섭창구단일화와 관련한 법률적 쟁점", 노동법연구, (18), pp.01~28 (2005), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 조상균, "개정노조법상 ‘교섭창구 단일화 방안’을 둘러싼 문제", 노동법논총, 18, pp.159~184 (2010), 한국비교노동법학회
- 임종률, "노동법 제8판" (2010), 박영사
- 한국의 노동법 개정과 노사관계-87년 이후 노동법 개정사를 중심으로-, "최영기", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2000)
- ILO, "Freedom of Association, Digest of decisions and principles of the Freedom of Association Committee of the Governing Body of the ILO, 5th ed" (2006)
