본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

마약류 규제정책에 관한 연구

Study on the Regulatory Policy of Narcotics

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Handling narcotics has not been allowed in legal terms. In this regard, its violation is under criminal punishment. Although narcotics had been recognized historically from the primitive age for religious rites and medical uses, today, handling narcotics with harmful effects is strictly faced restrictions, different from alcohols and cigarettes. In 1953, the Korean Criminal Code regulated the punishment on Opium, which went through several steps of institutions and amendments on narcotics control laws. Now that ‘the Control Laws related narcotic drugs’ has come into effect to control drug substances uniformly. In cases of regulating drug substances, the need for joint international assistance has been tendered at previous times and international organizations established the systems to restrict the standard of drug substances. Throughout the international treaty, each country is to accommodate what has been designated as a drug related substance, and controls the whole classification of drugs. But one thing to note that each country regulates the level of restrictions differently depending on its circumstances, most countries customarily regulate uniformly about what had been classified as illegal drugs. Korea strictly regulates the drug related substances. According to references of handling from Prosecution offices, the rate of public trials of narcotic criminals is markedly higher than that of general criminals. This is due to the high recidivism rate in narcotic crimes and its criminal significance. The continuous on-going crackdown measure taken on illegal drugs does not help decrease the frequency of handling narcotics and cannot face the limitation on the theory of punishment rule. It is believed that turning-around to meet a new policy needs to overcome the boundary of the punishment theory. Studies have shown that the regulatory policy of narcotics in some countries indicate a step forward to decriminalizing the less harmful drug substances. Also it needs to review the potential of implementation of decriminalizing policies in Korea.

Abstract

Handling narcotics has not been allowed in legal terms. In this regard, its violation is under criminal punishment. Although narcotics had been recognized historically from the primitive age for religious rites and medical uses, today, handling narcotics with harmful effects is strictly faced restrictions, different from alcohols and cigarettes. In 1953, the Korean Criminal Code regulated the punishment on Opium, which went through several steps of institutions and amendments on narcotics control laws. Now that ‘the Control Laws related narcotic drugs’ has come into effect to control drug substances uniformly. In cases of regulating drug substances, the need for joint international assistance has been tendered at previous times and international organizations established the systems to restrict the standard of drug substances. Throughout the international treaty, each country is to accommodate what has been designated as a drug related substance, and controls the whole classification of drugs. But one thing to note that each country regulates the level of restrictions differently depending on its circumstances, most countries customarily regulate uniformly about what had been classified as illegal drugs. Korea strictly regulates the drug related substances. According to references of handling from Prosecution offices, the rate of public trials of narcotic criminals is markedly higher than that of general criminals. This is due to the high recidivism rate in narcotic crimes and its criminal significance. The continuous on-going crackdown measure taken on illegal drugs does not help decrease the frequency of handling narcotics and cannot face the limitation on the theory of punishment rule. It is believed that turning-around to meet a new policy needs to overcome the boundary of the punishment theory. Studies have shown that the regulatory policy of narcotics in some countries indicate a step forward to decriminalizing the less harmful drug substances. Also it needs to review the potential of implementation of decriminalizing policies in Korea.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 마약류 통제정책의 현황과 발전방안, "김상희", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1992)
  2. 마약류 통제정책의 현황과 발전방안, "김상희", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1991)
  3. 마약류 사용사범에 대한 형사절차상 치료적 개입방안, "김은경", ~ (2005)
  4. 마약류 수요억제 및 마약류 사범처우합리화를 위한 종합대책, "김은경", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
  5. 마약류수요억제를 위한 입법적 개선방안, "김한균", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
  6. 대검찰청, "2012 마약류 범죄백서" (2013), 대검찰청
  7. 명주완, "우리나라 마약중독의 연혁과 메사돈파동", 대학의학협회지, 8(9) (1965)
  8. 배성태, "마약류 실체" (2011), 도서출판 조은
  9. 마약류 지정기준에 관한 연구, "신의기", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
  10. 마약류사범 처리실태, "신의기", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
  11. 유기천, "형법학-각론강의" (1988), 일조각
  12. 현행 약물규제법규에 관한 연구-해석론과 입법론을 중심으로-, "장영민", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1992)
  13. 조성권, "마약의 역사" (2012), 인간사랑
  14. 마약류 확산실태와 21세기 마약류 통제정책의 방향, "조은석", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2001)
  15. 국내외 사례를 통한 마약류 예방 및 사회복귀지원 사업 선진화 방안 연구, "한동운", 식품의약품안전청, ~ (2011)
  16. 김낭희, "마약류사범의 약물중독, 알코올의존, 정신질환 특성에 관한 탐색적 연구 - 이중의존과 이중진단 위험군을 중심으로", 정신보건과 사회사업, 40(4), pp.175~204 (2012), 한국정신보건사회복지학회
  17. 김성천, "비범죄화", 중앙법학, (2) (2001), 중앙법학회
  18. 김주일, "독일 약물합법화론에 대한 연구", 한독사회과학논총, 20(2), pp.61~90 (2010), 한독사회과학회
  19. 김창선, "한국마약중독자의 사적 고찰", 신경정신의학, 2(1) (1963), 대한신경정신의학회
  20. 배종대, "마약범죄와 인간의 존엄", 안암법학, 4 (1996), 안암법학회
  21. 신의기, "마약류 남용에 대한 법적 대응 –치료보호를 중심으로-" (2003), 서강대학교 생명문화연구원
  22. 신의기, "마약류 규제에 관한 국제협력–조약을 중심으로-", 형사정책연구, 5(2)통권 : 18 (1994), 형사정책연구원
  23. 이건호, "마약문제의 해결을 위한 각국의 전략 비교분석", 한립법학 FORUM, 15 (2004), 한림대학교법학연구소
  24. 조석연, "마약법 제정 이후 한국의 마약문제와 국가통제(1957∼1976)", 한국근현대사연구, (65), pp.232~266 (2013), 한국근현대사학회
  25. 조석연, "해방 이후의 마약문제와 사회적 인식 - 해방과 정부수립 초기를 중심으로 -", 사학연구, (108), pp.301~342 (2012), 한국사학회
  26. Wolfgang Naucke, "Über deklaratorische, sccheinbare und wirkliche Entkriminalisierung", pp.199~ (1984)
  27. "National drug Control Strategy"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)