본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유럽연합회원국간 송달공조에 관한 연구 - 유럽연합송달규칙을 중심으로 -

A Study on European service of documents

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

EU service of documents(regulation No 1393/2007) is shown that "The proper functioning of the internal market entails the need to improve and expedite the transmission of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters for service between the Member States." European Union member states is the member states of Hague delivery convention(Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters). When European Union member states participate in Hague convention, European Union member states reserve declaration on specific matters, for example, way of service. This can be inconvenient to enter into a bilateral treaty between Member States in the interests. For this reason, the EU is using the Community method seems to have enacted legislation the EU rules. The Hague Convention on service delivery rules, the European Union and the main difference is that seemingly inconvenient. EU delivery rules enables rapid international delivery. It is characterized by a point system to protect the interests of the plaintiff rather than the defendant EU service of documents(regulation No 1393/2007) puts in Article 5(Translation of documents), Article 6(Receipt of documents by receiving agency), Article 8(Refusal to accept a document), Article 9(Date of service), Article 19(Defendant not entering an appearance) has meaning. South Korea, China and Japan are signatories of the Hague delivery convention. Korea has declared reservations acceding to the Convention. Declared Reservation is unavailable for the simple delivery method on the service agreement and There will be disputants to inhibit the rapidity international litigation. As a result, signed a bilateral treaty on delivery or air conditioning, it is necessary to conclude a multilateral treaty. EU service of documents is the appropriate model for reference.

Abstract

EU service of documents(regulation No 1393/2007) is shown that "The proper functioning of the internal market entails the need to improve and expedite the transmission of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters for service between the Member States." European Union member states is the member states of Hague delivery convention(Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters). When European Union member states participate in Hague convention, European Union member states reserve declaration on specific matters, for example, way of service. This can be inconvenient to enter into a bilateral treaty between Member States in the interests. For this reason, the EU is using the Community method seems to have enacted legislation the EU rules. The Hague Convention on service delivery rules, the European Union and the main difference is that seemingly inconvenient. EU delivery rules enables rapid international delivery. It is characterized by a point system to protect the interests of the plaintiff rather than the defendant EU service of documents(regulation No 1393/2007) puts in Article 5(Translation of documents), Article 6(Receipt of documents by receiving agency), Article 8(Refusal to accept a document), Article 9(Date of service), Article 19(Defendant not entering an appearance) has meaning. South Korea, China and Japan are signatories of the Hague delivery convention. Korea has declared reservations acceding to the Convention. Declared Reservation is unavailable for the simple delivery method on the service agreement and There will be disputants to inhibit the rapidity international litigation. As a result, signed a bilateral treaty on delivery or air conditioning, it is necessary to conclude a multilateral treaty. EU service of documents is the appropriate model for reference.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 김용진, "다국적기업의 법률문제" (2015), 마인드맵
  2. 김용진, "공동체법으로서의 유럽민사소송법의 발전과정", 저스티스, (87), pp.120~135 (2005), 한국법학원
  3. 김용진, "외국송달의 운영시스템과 그 개선방안 -한․중․일 사법공조 강화방안을 중심으로-", 법학연구, 23(1), pp.509~548 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  4. 김대순, "국제법론(17판)" (2013), 삼영사
  5. 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 민사소송(Ⅲ)" (2014), 법원행정처
  6. 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2013), 박영사
  7. 김상원, "주석 신민사소송법(Ⅲ)" (2004), 한국사법행정학회
  8. 서성운, "유럽연합조정에 관한연구", 박사, pp.2015
  9. 2012, , ~
  10. 석광현, "한중 사법공조의 실천현황과 개선방안", 국제거래법연구, 23(2), pp.317~352 (2014), 국제거래법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)