본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Spoken Acceptability Judgment, Reaction Time and a Comparison with Written Judgment

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper explores how the modality of task presentation (spoken vs. written) influences the perception of sentences by native Korean speakers, focusing on ditransitive constructions. We conducted a spoken acceptability judgment experiment to collect acceptability scores and reaction times, examining both the judgment outcomes and processes. The spoken judgments were further compared with those obtained in a previous written judgment study by Park and Yi (2021) to directly assess the impact of presentation modality on ditransitive perception. The spoken experiment revealed general and construction-specific patterns in the relationship between acceptability scores and reaction times. Furthermore, we found the presentation modality significantly affects the acceptability scores and reaction times of ditransitives, with its precise influence varying depending on construction type and verb semantics. These results highlight the value of using spoken stimuli in acceptability judgment experiments and incorporating reaction time data in theoretical and psycholinguistic research.

Abstract

This paper explores how the modality of task presentation (spoken vs. written) influences the perception of sentences by native Korean speakers, focusing on ditransitive constructions. We conducted a spoken acceptability judgment experiment to collect acceptability scores and reaction times, examining both the judgment outcomes and processes. The spoken judgments were further compared with those obtained in a previous written judgment study by Park and Yi (2021) to directly assess the impact of presentation modality on ditransitive perception. The spoken experiment revealed general and construction-specific patterns in the relationship between acceptability scores and reaction times. Furthermore, we found the presentation modality significantly affects the acceptability scores and reaction times of ditransitives, with its precise influence varying depending on construction type and verb semantics. These results highlight the value of using spoken stimuli in acceptability judgment experiments and incorporating reaction time data in theoretical and psycholinguistic research.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Altmann, G. T. M., "Incremental interpretation at verbs:Restricting the domain of subsequent reference", Cognition, 73, pp.247~264 (1999)
  2. Bader, M., "Case and linking in language comprehension:Evidence from German" (2006), Springer
  3. Andrea Beltrama, "Unacceptable but comprehensible: the facilitation effect of resumptive pronouns", Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 1(1) (2016), Open Library of the Humanities[DOI]
  4. Bowles, M. A., "Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), pp.247~271 (2011)
  5. Cho, Y., "Korean experimental syntax: A case of acceptability judgments of Korean multiple accusative constructions", PhD, pp.2015
  6. Clifton, C. Jr., "Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, pp.696~708 (1984)
  7. Deniz, N. D., "Processing syntactic and semantic information in the L2 : Evidence for differential cue-weighting in the L1 and L2", Bilingualism:Language and Cognition, 25, pp.713~725 (2022)
  8. Rod Ellis, "MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(02) (2005), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  9. Ellis, R., "Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency : The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge", Applied Linguistics, 27, pp.431~463 (2006)
  10. Erlam, R., "Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge : An empirical validation study", Applied Linguistics, 27, pp.464~491 (2006)
  11. Ferreira, F., "The independence of syntactic processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 25, pp.348~368 (1986)
  12. Ferreira, F., "The production and comprehension of resumptive pronouns in relative clause “island” contexts", pp.263~278 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum
  13. Fodor, J. D., "Syntactic features in reanalysis: Positive and negative symptoms", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(1), pp.25~36 (2000)
  14. Frenck-Mestre, C., "Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers", Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(3), pp.385~404 (2018)
  15. Cheryl Frenck-Mestre, "The Online Processing of Korean Case by Native Korean Speakers and Second Language Learners as Revealed by Eye Movements", Brain Sciences, 12(9), pp.1230~ (2022), MDPI AG[DOI]
  16. Haspelmath, M., "Ditransitive constructions", Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, pp.19~41 (2015)
  17. Hopp, H., "Ultimate attainment at the interfaces in second language acquisition: Grammar and processing", PhD, pp.2007
  18. Holger Hopp, "Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(3) (2015), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  19. Ferdy Hubers, "Processing Prescriptively Incorrect Comparative Particles: Evidence From Sentence-Matching and Eye-Tracking", Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (2020), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  20. Kamide, Y., "The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing : Evidence from anticipatory eye movements", Journal of Memory and Language, 49, pp.133~156 (2003)
  21. Kamide, Y., "Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing : Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), pp.37~55 (2003)
  22. Jeong-eun Kim, "MEASURES OF IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE REVISITED", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), pp.431~457 (2016), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  23. Kizach, J., "Givenness, complexity, and the Danish dative alternation", Memory and Cognition, 41, pp.1159~1171 (2013)
  24. 이한정, "Two types of variation in the morphosyntactic expression of recipients of dative verbs in Korean", 언어연구, 35(3), pp.449~482 (2018), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  25. McElree, B., "Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), pp.134~157 (1995)
  26. SANAKO MITSUGI, "The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese", Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), pp.19~35 (2015), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  27. Nagata, H., "On-line judgments of grammaticality of sentences", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, pp.987~994 (1990)
  28. Palmer, S. E., "The information processing approach to cognition", pp.37~77 (1986), Lawrence Erlbaum
  29. 박상희, "Perception-production asymmetry for Korean double accusative ditransitives", 언어연구, 38(1), pp.27~52 (2021), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  30. Schütze, C., "The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology" (1996), Language Science Press
  31. Yourdanis Sedarous, "Using audio stimuli in acceptability judgment experiments", Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(8) (2020), Wiley[DOI]
  32. Shin, G. h., "Language use matters: Verb-construction fusion in the comprehension of dative constructions in Korean", Paper presented at the 21st Meeting of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics (2019)
  33. Spada, N,, "Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies", Language Learning, 65(3), pp.723~751 (2015)
  34. Sprouse, J., "Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax", Journal of Linguistics, 48, pp.609~652 (2012)
  35. Van Dyke, J. A., "Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), pp.407~430 (2007)
  36. Van Dyke, J. A., "Cue-dependent interference in comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 65, pp.247~263 (2011)
  37. Vogel, R., "Grammatical taboos: An investigation on the impact of prescription in acceptability judgment experiments", Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 38(1), pp.37~79 (2019)
  38. 이은경, "Can focus salvage the double accusative ditranstive construction in Korean? An experimental investigation", 언어연구, 39(2), pp.235~274 (2022), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  39. Yoon, S., "Constructions, semantic compatibility, and coercion: An empirical usage-based approach", PhD, pp.2012

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)