Applications of Convexity in Semantics for Natural Language
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the article is to present an overview of how convexity serves as a constraint on the semantics of natural language. I begin by presenting four question that a semantic theory should be able to answer. The semantic theory I propose is based on conceptual spaces, which are geometrical or topological structures provided with a betweenness relation. Previously, I have proposed the criterion that a natural concept is a convex region in a conceptual space. I show how this criterion can be expanded to an analysis of how convexity plays a role in the semantics of different word classes. I will show that the convexity criterion also improves the learnability of word meanings. Voronoi tessellations based on prototypes of categories can function as an efficient mechanism behind such learning processes. For many applications, a Euclidean or a city-block metric provides this relation, but for some word classes, for example color words and prepositions, polar convexity is required. Another topic concerns how the mappings between words and regions in conceptual spaces can be aligned between different individuals – in other words, how we know that we mean the same things when we use a word. If continuity and convexity of the mappings are assumed, Brouwer’s fixpoint theorem assures that there exist “meetings of minds” as regards word meanings.
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to present an overview of how convexity serves as a constraint on the semantics of natural language. I begin by presenting four question that a semantic theory should be able to answer. The semantic theory I propose is based on conceptual spaces, which are geometrical or topological structures provided with a betweenness relation. Previously, I have proposed the criterion that a natural concept is a convex region in a conceptual space. I show how this criterion can be expanded to an analysis of how convexity plays a role in the semantics of different word classes. I will show that the convexity criterion also improves the learnability of word meanings. Voronoi tessellations based on prototypes of categories can function as an efficient mechanism behind such learning processes. For many applications, a Euclidean or a city-block metric provides this relation, but for some word classes, for example color words and prepositions, polar convexity is required. Another topic concerns how the mappings between words and regions in conceptual spaces can be aligned between different individuals – in other words, how we know that we mean the same things when we use a word. If continuity and convexity of the mappings are assumed, Brouwer’s fixpoint theorem assures that there exist “meetings of minds” as regards word meanings.
참고문헌 (42)
- Bloom, P., "How Children Learn the Meanings of Words" (2000), MIT Press
- Brouwer, L. E. J., "Über eine eindeutige, stetige Transformation von Flächen in sich", Mathematische Annalen, 69, pp.176~180 (1910)
- De Saussure, F., "Cours de linguistique générale" (1966), Payot
- Dekker, P., "Bi-directional optimality theory : An application of game theory", Journal of Semantics, 17(3), pp.217~242 (2000)
- Douven, I., "Concept learning: Convexity versus connectedness", Erkenntnis, pp.1~18 (2024)
- Eschenbach, C., "Spatial cognition II", pp.127~144 (2000), Springer-Verlag
- Fairbanks, G., "A psychophysical investigation of vowel formants", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 4, pp.203~219 (1961)
- Gärdenfors, P., "Does semantics need reality? In Does Representation Need Reality?", Proceedings of the International Conference New Trends in Cognitive Science, pp.113~120 (1997), Austrian Society of Cognitive Science
- Gärdenfors, P., "Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought" (2000), MIT Press
- Gärdenfors, P., "Body, language and mind, Volume 1: Embodiment", pp.167~195 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Gärdenfors, P., "Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces" (2014), MIT Press
- Gärdenfors, P., "An epigenetic approach to semantic domains", IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 12(2), pp.139~147 (2020)[DOI]
- Gärdenfors, P., "New perspectives on conceptual engineering (Volume 1: Foundational issues in conceptual engineering)", Springer
- Gärdenfors, P., "Using conceptual spaces to model actions and events", Journal of Semantics, 29(4), pp.487~519 (2012)
- Garner, W. R., "The Processing of Information and Structure" (1974), Erlbaum
- Gehrke, B., "Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events", Doctor, pp.2008
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantics and Cognition" (1983), MIT Press
- Jäger, G., "The evolution of convex categories", Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(6), pp.551~564 (2008)
- Jäger, G., "Natural color categories are convex sets", Amsterdam Colloquium 2009 (2010)
- Jäger, G., "Language structure : Psychological and social constraints", Synthese, 159(1), pp.99~130 (2007)
- Johannesson, M., "Geometric Models of Similarity" (2002), Lund University Cognitive Studies
- Kornai, A., "Vector Semantics" (2023), Springer Nature
- Kracht, M., "Syntax and semantics of spatial prepositions", pp.35~62 (2008), John Benjamins
- Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Maddox, W. T., "Multidimensional models of perception and cognition", pp.147~180 (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Marsden, J. E., "Vector Calculus" (1981), W. H. Freeman and Company
- Melara, R. D., "Psychophysical approaches to cognition", pp.303~388 (1992), Elsevier
- Moullec, M., "Cheaper spaces", Minds and Machines, 35(1), pp.1~21 (2025)
- Nosofsky, R. M., "Similarity, frequency, and category representations", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), pp.54~65 (1988)
- Okabe, A., "Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams" (1992), John Wiley & Sons
- Pantcheva, M., "The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources", Linguistics, 48(5), pp.1043~1081 (2010)
- Parikh, P., "Language and Equilibrium" (2010), MIT Press
- Pickering, M. J., "Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), pp.169~190 (2004)
- Rappaport Hovav, M., "Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure", pp.21~38 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Rosch, E., "Cognitive representations of semantic categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 104(3), pp.192~233 (1975)
- Rosch, E., "Structural bases of typicality effects", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 2(3), pp.491~502 (1976)
- Shepard, R. N., "Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1(1), pp.54~87 (1964)
- Shepard, R. N., "Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science", Science, 237(4820), pp.1317~1323 (1987)
- Steinert-Threlkeld, S., "Ease of learning explains semantic universals", Cognition, 195, pp.104076~ (2020)
- Van Benthem, J. F. A. K., "New perspectives on games and interaction", pp.197~209 (2008), Amsterdam University Press
- Zwarts, J., "Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths", Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), pp.739~779 (2005)
- Zwarts, J., "Locative and directional prepositions in conceptual spaces: The role of polar convexity", Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 25(1), pp.109~138 (2016)