당뇨병성 다발신경병증의 조기 진단에서 신경전도검사의 유용성에 관한 논란
Controversies on the Usefulness of Nerve Conduction Study in the Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Polyneuropathy
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is the most frequently encountered form of neuropathy in diabetic patients, and it either relentlessly progresses or remains relatively stable for many years, not showing any trend towards improvement. From this point of view, early detection of DPN is very important to prevent the irreversible change of the peripheral nerve from diabetic insults. Although a number of clinical symptoms and/or deficit scales have been developed for clinical or research purposes, nerve conduction study (NCS) has been known one of the most objective and sensitive tools to detect peripheral nerve dysfunctions in diabetic patients. NCS, however, also have several shortcomings. The next two consecutive articles will focus on debates about diagnostic usefulness of NCS and on recent updates of other diagnostic tests including quantitative sensory testings and skin biopsy in the field of diabetic polyneuropathy.
Abstract
Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is the most frequently encountered form of neuropathy in diabetic patients, and it either relentlessly progresses or remains relatively stable for many years, not showing any trend towards improvement. From this point of view, early detection of DPN is very important to prevent the irreversible change of the peripheral nerve from diabetic insults. Although a number of clinical symptoms and/or deficit scales have been developed for clinical or research purposes, nerve conduction study (NCS) has been known one of the most objective and sensitive tools to detect peripheral nerve dysfunctions in diabetic patients. NCS, however, also have several shortcomings. The next two consecutive articles will focus on debates about diagnostic usefulness of NCS and on recent updates of other diagnostic tests including quantitative sensory testings and skin biopsy in the field of diabetic polyneuropathy.
참고문헌 (20)
- Kim SM, "Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Korea:Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey 2001", DiabetesCare, 29, pp.226~231 (2006)
- Young MJ, "A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheralneuropathy in UK hospital clinical population", Diabetologia, 36, pp.150~154 (1993)
- Dyck PJ, "The prevalence by stagedseverity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathyand nephropathy in a population based cohort: The RochesterDiabetic Neuropathy Study", Neurology, 43, pp.817~824 (1993)
- Smith AG, "The diagnostic yield of a standardizedapproach to idiopathic sensory-predominant neuropathy", Arch Intern Med, 164, pp.1021~1025 (2004)
- Kohara N, "F-wave latency serves as the most reproducible measurein nerve conduction studies of diabetic polyneuropathy: muticentreanalysis in healthy subjects and patients with diabeticpolyneuropathy", Diabetologia, 43, pp.915~921 (2000)
- Jamal GA, "The neurophysiologicinvestigation of small fiber neuropathies", MuscleNerve, 10, pp.537~545 (1987)
- Mackel R, "Conduction of neural impulses in diabeticneuropathy", Clin Neurophysiol, 114, pp.248~255 (2003)
- Kincaid JC, "Correlationof vibratory quantitative sensory testing and nerve conductionstudies in patients with diabetes", Muscle Nerve, 36, pp.821~827 (2007)
- Shy ME, "Quantitative sensory testing: Report of theTherapeutic and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of theAmerican Academy of Neurology", Neurology, 60, pp.898~904 (2003)
- Mcarthur JC, "Epidermal nerve fiber density. Normative reference range anddiagnostic efficiency", Arch Neurol, 55, pp.1513~1520 (1998)
- Holland N, "Intraepidermal nerve fiber density in patientswith painful sensory neuropathy", Neurology, 48, pp.708~711 (1997)
- Koskinen M, "A quantitative method for the assessment ofintraepidermal nerve fibers in small-fiber neuropathy", Neurol, 252, pp.789~794 (2005)
- Beiswinger KK, "Epidermal nervefiber quantification in the assessment of diabetic neuropathy", Acta Histochemica
- Dyck PJ, "Longitudinalassessment of diabetic polyneuropathy using a composite scorein the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study cohort", Neurology, 49, pp.229~239 (1997)
- Koçer A, "Acomparison of sural nerve conduction studies in patients withimpaired oral glucose tolerance test", Acta Neurol Scand, 116, pp.399~405 (2007)
- Bae JS, "Subclinical diabetic neuropathy with normalconventional electrophysiological study", Neurol, 254, pp.53~59 (2007)
- Bertora P, "Prevalence of subclinicalneuropathy in diabetic patients: assessment by study of conductionvelocity distribution within motor and sensory nervefibres", Neurol, 245, pp.81~86 (1998)
- Papanas N, "Sensitivity and specificityof a new indicator test (Neuropad) for the diagnosis ofperipheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes patients: a comparisonof with clinical examination and nerve conduction study", JDiabetes Complications, 21, pp.353~358 (2007)
- Yaman M, "Kızıltan ME. Thecutaneous silent period in diabetes mellitus", Neurosci Letters, 419, pp.258~262 (2007)
- Lauria G, "Intraepidermal nerve fiber density in rat foot pad:neuropathologic-neurophysiologic correlation", of PeripherNerv Syst, 10, pp.202~208 (2005)