패널데이터를 이용한 국가어항개발사업의 어촌소득 증대효과 분석
An Analysis of Income Effect of the Project of Developing National Fishing Port - by Using the Panel Data of Korea -
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this study is to analyze the income effect of the project of developing national fishing port (hereafter, Project of DNFP) in Korea. For the empirical study, we collected a panel data set whose variables are the income level, the value of fishing amount and the year when the observed fishing port became the national one. The data period is from 1989 to 2004 and the number of the observed fishing ports is 388.According to the analysis, as a whole, Project of DNFP has been effective on raising the income. However, there appears different results on the two aspects, one is regional and the second is periodic. First, on the regional aspect, Project of DNFP has been effective in such regions as Jeonnam, Jeonbuk, Chungnam, Kangwon, but not effective in such regions as Gyeonggi, Incheon, Gyeongnam, Gyeongbuk, Jeju. Second, on the periodic aspect, Project of DNFP has become less effective during the project period. Although the statistical significance is poor, the sign of the effectiveness has appeared negative since 2000. As a result, we recommend that the government should modify the way how Project of DNFP is conducted.
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to analyze the income effect of the project of developing national fishing port (hereafter, Project of DNFP) in Korea. For the empirical study, we collected a panel data set whose variables are the income level, the value of fishing amount and the year when the observed fishing port became the national one. The data period is from 1989 to 2004 and the number of the observed fishing ports is 388.According to the analysis, as a whole, Project of DNFP has been effective on raising the income. However, there appears different results on the two aspects, one is regional and the second is periodic. First, on the regional aspect, Project of DNFP has been effective in such regions as Jeonnam, Jeonbuk, Chungnam, Kangwon, but not effective in such regions as Gyeonggi, Incheon, Gyeongnam, Gyeongbuk, Jeju. Second, on the periodic aspect, Project of DNFP has become less effective during the project period. Although the statistical significance is poor, the sign of the effectiveness has appeared negative since 2000. As a result, we recommend that the government should modify the way how Project of DNFP is conducted.
참고문헌 (16)
- "어항시설 개선 및 확충사업 추진실태 감사결과 처분 요구서" (2005), 감사원
- "어촌계 분류평정 및 현황, 1990∼2005년도" (2005), 수산업협동조합
- "어항개발의 경제성평가분석 방법론에 관한 연구" (2005)
- "재정사업 심층평가 지침" (2006), 한국개발연구원
- "수산정책편람" (2006), 해양수산부
- "어항개발추진 정책방향" (2005), 해양수산부
- "어항수요 및 지정기준 산정 용역 보고서" (2004), 해양수산부
- "전국어항개발 투자효과 분석 및 개발방안" (2000), 해양수산부
- "국가어항건설사업" (2007), KDI 공공투자관리센터 및 한국해양수산개발원
- "水産基盤整備事業費用效果分析の ガイド?ライン" (2002), 日本 農林水産省
- "漁港漁村整備事業の 費用效果分析につぃての一考察" (1998)
- "水産基盤施設整備事業の平價手法と效果的整備の檢討" (2003)
- "第43回全國漁港建設技術硏究發表會 講演集" (2001), 日本 農林水産省
- "第43回全國漁港建設技術硏究發表會 講演集" (2000), 日本 農林水産省
- "State-Space Models with Regime Switching" (1999)
- "A Guide to Econometrics" (2003), The MIT Press
