AHP 분석에 의한 선박안전관리대행업체 평가요인 중요도 분석
Assessment on the Importance of Evaluation Factors for Ship’s Safety Management Company by the AHP
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Marine accidents have influence over a seafarer’s life, the property on the ship and cargo, as well as the environment at sea. According to the analysis of marine accident, most accidents usually happened as a result of human error, in the form of negligence, improper maneuvering of the ship, violating international regulations for preventing marine accidents. As result, many countries adopted the ISM Code for preventing marine accidents and enforcement of the ship’s safety management. The Korean government also legislated a maritime safety law for systematic safety management on Korean flag ships, and ship owners can now outsource their ship’s safety management, to a safety management company, under this law. However, there are many small companies without professionalism because it’s easy to enroll a safety management company abiding by only this basic requirement. As a result, requests for improvement of business expertise are increasing through the objective evaluation system, in the safety management market. Therefore, in this paper, we defined evaluation items for safety management companies through brainstorming with expert group, and then we carried out a survey to two groups (evaluator group, examinee group), and identified the weights of importance determinants in evaluation, using AHP. We also carried out statistical tests to determine the perception gap of weights between the evaluator group and the examinee group. The weights for evaluation of the ship’s safety management company had been identified, and there are differences of weight between the two groups, We learned that the evaluator group considered the staff’s safety education, education & training system and safety quality improvement rate, to be more important. On the other hand, in the examinee group, customer satisfaction and system management results, such as ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001, are treated more importantly than others. In conclusion, we can put the evaluation items and the importance to practical evaluation of safety management ability under responsibilities of the safety management company.
Abstract
Marine accidents have influence over a seafarer’s life, the property on the ship and cargo, as well as the environment at sea. According to the analysis of marine accident, most accidents usually happened as a result of human error, in the form of negligence, improper maneuvering of the ship, violating international regulations for preventing marine accidents. As result, many countries adopted the ISM Code for preventing marine accidents and enforcement of the ship’s safety management. The Korean government also legislated a maritime safety law for systematic safety management on Korean flag ships, and ship owners can now outsource their ship’s safety management, to a safety management company, under this law. However, there are many small companies without professionalism because it’s easy to enroll a safety management company abiding by only this basic requirement. As a result, requests for improvement of business expertise are increasing through the objective evaluation system, in the safety management market. Therefore, in this paper, we defined evaluation items for safety management companies through brainstorming with expert group, and then we carried out a survey to two groups (evaluator group, examinee group), and identified the weights of importance determinants in evaluation, using AHP. We also carried out statistical tests to determine the perception gap of weights between the evaluator group and the examinee group. The weights for evaluation of the ship’s safety management company had been identified, and there are differences of weight between the two groups, We learned that the evaluator group considered the staff’s safety education, education & training system and safety quality improvement rate, to be more important. On the other hand, in the examinee group, customer satisfaction and system management results, such as ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001, are treated more importantly than others. In conclusion, we can put the evaluation items and the importance to practical evaluation of safety management ability under responsibilities of the safety management company.
참고문헌 (23)
- 2013년 해사안전시행계획, "국토해양부", ~ (2013)
- 김영문, "관광지선택에 있어서 AHP의 활용에 관한 연구", 관광학연구, 20(1), pp.63~81 (1996), 한국관광학회
- 김충련, "SPSS데이터분석" (2012), 21세기사
- 김태완, "계층분석과정(AHP)에 의한 지역농업정책의 우선순위 결정 : 창녕지역을 중심으로", 한국국제농업개발학회지, 22(1), pp.8~14 (2010), 한국국제농업개발학회
- 김화영, "Imitation Strategy를 이용한 해운선사 안전도 평가 전략에 관한 연구", 해양환경안전학회 추계학술대회 논문집, pp.196~198 (2012), 해양환경안전학회
- 노창균, "AHP를 이용한 안전관리체체 운영평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", 해양환경안전학회 춘계학술대회 논문집, pp.21~26 (2006), 해양환경안전학회
- 노화준, "정책분석론" (2003), 박영사
- 류근관, "통계학" (2006), 법문사
- 박성일, "국제안전관리규약(ISM Code)에 대한 소고", 해사법연구, 18(2), pp.295~322 (2006), 한국해사법학회
- 박일섭, "소규모 철강사업장의 안전관리 활동 평가항목 개발", 대한안전경영과학회지, 14(3), pp.59~66 (2012), 대한안전경영과학회
- 송보영, "철도안전도 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", 한국철도학회논문집, 12(4), pp.443~449 (2009), 한국철도학회
- 박근상, "농작업 및 생활환경 안전관리 평가지표 개발", 대한인간공학회지, 28(4), pp.77~82 (2009), 대한인간공학회
- 장인식, "해양사고 방지를 위한 효율적 안전관리 방안", 해양환경안전학회지, 15(1), pp.33~39 (2009), 해양환경안전학회
- 정정호, "내항선안전관리체제 운영의 내실화 방안에 관한 연구", 해양환경안전학회지, 12(4), pp.241~246 (2006), 해양환경안전학회
- Aczel, J., "Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgement”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology", 27(1), pp.93~102 (1983), Elsevier Inc
- Saaty, T. L., "A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), pp.23~281 (1977), Elsevier Inc
- Saaty, T. L., "How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operation Research, 48(1), pp.9~26 (1990), Elsevier Inc
- Zeithaml, V. A., "Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence", Journal of Marketing, American Marketing Association, 52(3) (1988), JSTOR
- "해양사고통계 및 재결서", 해양안전심판원[URL]
- "해양수산부"[URL]
- "해사안전법 등 관련법령", 법제처[URL]
- Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region, "Tokyo MOU", ~ (2012)
- 한국해양수산연수원, "ISM Code 요소해설", ~ (2013)
