Comparison between QraypenTM Imaging and the Conventional Methods of Visual Inspection and Periapical Radiography for Proximal Caries Detection in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the newly-developed QraypenTM (All In One Bio, Korea) system for the diagnosis of earlyproximal caries by comparing it with the conventional methods of visual inspection and periapical radiography. This study was carried out from July2015 to April 2016 targeting 32 children aged 7∼12 years who visited Y-Dental Clinic for school oral health examinations. Two investigatorsselected and examined a total of 153 primary molars that had not undergone restorative treatment. Comparisons were carried out between visualinspections, readings of posterior periapical radiography images, and readings of QraypenTM images. This study revealed that the percentage ofinterproximal surfaces of primary molar teeth without caries incidence was 83.7% using QraypenTM imaging and 84.9% using visual inspection andperiapical radiography. The differences between the two methods were not statistically significant. Thus, QraypenTM is expected to be a useful andconvenient auxiliary diagnostic device that can facilitate the detection of hidden proximal caries in primary molars.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the newly-developed QraypenTM (All In One Bio, Korea) system for the diagnosis of earlyproximal caries by comparing it with the conventional methods of visual inspection and periapical radiography. This study was carried out from July2015 to April 2016 targeting 32 children aged 7∼12 years who visited Y-Dental Clinic for school oral health examinations. Two investigatorsselected and examined a total of 153 primary molars that had not undergone restorative treatment. Comparisons were carried out between visualinspections, readings of posterior periapical radiography images, and readings of QraypenTM images. This study revealed that the percentage ofinterproximal surfaces of primary molar teeth without caries incidence was 83.7% using QraypenTM imaging and 84.9% using visual inspection andperiapical radiography. The differences between the two methods were not statistically significant. Thus, QraypenTM is expected to be a useful andconvenient auxiliary diagnostic device that can facilitate the detection of hidden proximal caries in primary molars.
참고문헌 (26)
- Oral Health in America: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, "US Department of Health and Human Services", National Institutes of Health, 276~277 (2000)
- Barmes DE, "Indicators for oral health and their implications for developing countries", Int Dent J, 33, pp.60~66 (1983)
- Bratthall D, "Estimation of global DMFT for 12-year-olds in 2004", Int Dent J, 55, pp.370~372 (2004)
- Korean National Oral Health Survey 2015, "2015 Ministry of Health & Welfare", Ministry of Health & Welfare, 3~413 (2015)
- Selwitz RH, "Dental caries", Lancet, 369, pp.51~59 (2007)
- Featherstone JD, "The science and practice of caries prevention", J Am Dent Assoc, 131, pp.887~899 (2000)
- 설재헌, "레이저 형광법을 이용한 인접면 우식증의 진단", 대한소아치과학회지, 31(2), pp.236~246 (2004), 대한소아치과학회
- Mejàre I, "Accuracy at radiography and probing for the diagnosis of proximal caries", Scand J Dent Res, 93, pp.178~184 (1985)
- Kim YH, "The value of periapical radiograph in the diagnosis of interproximal Caries", Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol, 30, pp.49~54 (2000)
- White SC, "Efficacy of FDA guidelines for ordering radiographs for caries detection", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 77, pp.531~540 (1994)
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, "Guideline on prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children, adolescents, and persons with special health care needs", Pediatr Dent, 34, pp.189~191 (2012)
- Manji F, "A random effects model for some epidemiological features of dental caries", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 19, pp.324~328 (1991)
- Ekstrand K, "Light microscope study of the effect of probing in occlusal surfaces", Caries Res, 21, pp.368~374 (1987)
- Ismail AI, "Clinical diagnosis of precavitated carious lesions", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 25, pp.13~23 (1997)
- Gonzalez-Cabezas C, "Measurement of mineral gain and loss on dental enamel and dentin using confocal microscopy", Methods Enzymol, 307, pp.485~496 (1999)
- Côrtes DF, "An in vitro comparison of a combined FOTI", visual examination of occlusal caries with other caries diagnostic methods and the effect of stain on their diagnostic performance, 2003, pp.37, 8~16
- Schneiderman A, "Assessment of dental caries with Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic TransIllumination (DIFOTI): in vitro study", Caries Res, 31, pp.103~110 (1997)
- Shi XQ, "Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries", Caries Res, 35, pp.21~26 (2001)
- Bader JD, "A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries", J Am Dent Assoc, 135, pp.1413~1426 (2004)
- Hope CK, "Photobleaching of red fluorescence in oral biofilms", J Periodontal Res, 46, pp.228~234 (2011)
- Meller C, "A new in vivo method for measuring caries activity using quantitative light induced fluorescence", Caries Res, 40, pp.90~96 (2006)
- 오혜영, "Q-Ray View 활용이 치위생과정을 위한 치아 검사의 신뢰도 향상에 미치는 영향", 치위생과학회지, 14(4), pp.461~467 (2014), 한국치위생과학회
- Weiss EI, "Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 2. Evaluation of the size of approximal lesions and need for treatment", J Dent, 24, pp.385~388 (1996)
- Kidd EA, "A reappraisal of the value of the bite-wing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior proximal caries", Br Dent J, 169, pp.195~200 (1990)
- Senel B, "Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 39, pp.501~511 (2010)
- Pretty IA, "The effect of ambient light on QLF analyses", J Oral Rehabil, 29, pp.369~373 (2002)