Risk Factors for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Explantation and Erosion in Male Nonneurological Patients
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was performed to assess the risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) explantation in a large multicenter cohort. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for all 1,233 implantations of the AMS-800 AUS device in male nonneurological patients from 2005 to 2020 across 13 French centers. Patients with neurological conditions were excluded from the study. To identify factors associated with explantation-free survival, survival analysis was performed. Explantation was defined as the complete removal of the device, whereas revision referred to the replacement of the device or its components. Results: The study included 1,107 patients, of whom 281 underwent AUS explantation. The median survival without explantation was 83 months. The leading causes of explantation were infection and erosion. Univariate analysis revealed several significant risk factors for explantation: age above 75 years (34.6% in the explanted group vs. 25.8% in the nonexplanted group, P= 0.007), history of radiotherapy (43.5% vs. 31.3%, P=0.001), and anticoagulant use (15% vs. 8.6%, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the only significant risk factor was previous radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed 2 factors associated with earlier explantation: transcorporal cuff implantation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; P=0.01) and the annual caseload of the center (HR, 1.08; P=0.02). When specifically examining explantation due to erosion, radiotherapy was the sole factor significantly associated with the risk of erosion (OR, 2.47; P<0.05) as well as earlier erosion (HR, 1.90; P=0.039). Conclusions: In this series, conducted in a real-world setting across multiple centers with different volumes and levels of expertise, the median survival without AUS explantation was 83 months. This study confirms that radiotherapy represents the primary independent risk factor for AUS erosion in male nonneurological patients.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to assess the risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) explantation in a large multicenter cohort. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for all 1,233 implantations of the AMS-800 AUS device in male nonneurological patients from 2005 to 2020 across 13 French centers. Patients with neurological conditions were excluded from the study. To identify factors associated with explantation-free survival, survival analysis was performed. Explantation was defined as the complete removal of the device, whereas revision referred to the replacement of the device or its components. Results: The study included 1,107 patients, of whom 281 underwent AUS explantation. The median survival without explantation was 83 months. The leading causes of explantation were infection and erosion. Univariate analysis revealed several significant risk factors for explantation: age above 75 years (34.6% in the explanted group vs. 25.8% in the nonexplanted group, P= 0.007), history of radiotherapy (43.5% vs. 31.3%, P=0.001), and anticoagulant use (15% vs. 8.6%, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the only significant risk factor was previous radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed 2 factors associated with earlier explantation: transcorporal cuff implantation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; P=0.01) and the annual caseload of the center (HR, 1.08; P=0.02). When specifically examining explantation due to erosion, radiotherapy was the sole factor significantly associated with the risk of erosion (OR, 2.47; P<0.05) as well as earlier erosion (HR, 1.90; P=0.039). Conclusions: In this series, conducted in a real-world setting across multiple centers with different volumes and levels of expertise, the median survival without AUS explantation was 83 months. This study confirms that radiotherapy represents the primary independent risk factor for AUS erosion in male nonneurological patients.
참고문헌 (26)
- Tutolo M, "Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter(AUS) : results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up", Neurourol Urodyn, 38, pp.710~ (2019)
- MacDonald S, "Waves of change : national trends in surgical management of male stress incontinence", Urology, 108, pp.175~ (2017)
- Sandhu JS, "Treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence", Nat Rev Urol, 7, pp.222~ (2010)
- Scott FB, "Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. 1974", J Urol, 167(2 Pt 2), pp.1125~1129 (2002)
- Farag F, "Decline in artificial urinary sphincter survival in modern practicedo we treat a different patient?", Neurourol Urodyn, 36, pp.1350~1355 (2017)
- Bentellis I, "Prevalence and risk factors of artificial urinary sphincter revision in nonneurological male patients", J Urol, 206, pp.1248~1257 (2021)
- Dupuis HGA, "Early efficacy and safety outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter for stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery : results of a large multicentric study", Eur Urol Focus, 8, pp.1053~1059 (2022)
- Van der Aa F, "The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century : a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence", Eur Urol, 63, pp.681~ (2013)
- Moser DC, "Impact of radiation and transcorporeal artificial sphincter placement in patients with prior urethral cuff erosion : results from a retrospective multicenter analysis", J Urol, 200, pp.1338~ (2018)
- Ortiz NM, "Artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion heat map shows similar anatomical characteristics for transcorporal and standard approach", J Urol, 204, pp.1027~1032 (2020)
- Guralnick ML, "Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy", J Urol, 167, pp.2075~2078 (2002)
- Hird AE, "Artificial urinary sphincter erosion after radical prostatectomy in patients treated with and without radiation", Can Urol Assoc J, 9(5‑6), pp.354~ (2015)
- Mamane J, "Impact of radiation therapy on artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients : a multicenter study", Neurourol Urodyn, 41, pp.332~339 (2022)
- Bates AS, "Complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy : a meta-analysis", BJU Int, 116, pp.623~ (2015)
- Fuller TW, "Outcomes and risk factors of revision and replacement artificial urinary sphincter implantation in radiated and nonradiated cases", J Urol, 204, pp.110~ (2020)
- Hüsch T, "Debates on Male Incontinence(DOMINO)-Project. Risk factors for failure of male slings and artificial urinary sphincters : results from a large middle European Cohort Study", Urol Int, 99, pp.14~21 (2017)
- Brant WO, "Risk factors for erosion of artificial urinary sphincters : a multicenter prospective study", Urology, 84, pp.934~ (2014)
- Agarwal D, "Artificial urinary sphincter urethral erosions : temporal patterns, management, and incidence of preventable erosions", Indian J Urol, 33, pp.26~29 (2017)
- Halpern JA, "Use, complications, and costs of stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer", Cancer, 122, pp.2496~ (2016)
- El-Akri M, "Transcorporal vs. bulbar artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients with fragile urethra", World J Urol, 39, pp.4449~4457 (2021)
- Mock S, "The impact of urethral risk factors on transcorporeal artificial urinary sphincter erosion rates and device survival", J Urol, 194, pp.1692~1696 (2015)
- Medendorp AR, "The impact of frailty on artificial urinary sphincter placement and removal procedures", Urology, 129, pp.210~ (2019)
- Radomski SB, "Complications and interventions in patients with an artificial urinary sphincter : long-term results", J Urol, 200, pp.1093~1098 (2018)
- Raj GV, "Outcomes following erosions of the artificial urinary sphincter", J Urol, 175, pp.2186~2190 (2006)
- Kretschmer A, "Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failure", World J Urol, 34, pp.595~ (2016)
- Kretschmer A, "Complications and short-term explantation rate following artificial urinary sphincter implantation : results from a large middle European multi-institutional case series", Urol Int, 97, pp.205~ (2016)