Microbial Growth in Dental Unit Waterlines and Biofluorescence Monitoring Using QLF Technology After Regular Disinfection
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) are critical components of dental care. However, their small diameter and extended water stagnation time make them prone to microbial contamination and biofilm formation. This study evaluated microbial contamination following routine DUWL disinfection and investigated the applicability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) technology as a device for monitoring changes in biofluorescence within DUWLs. Methods: This study evaluated microbial growth in DUWLs after routine disinfection with hydrogen peroxide every two weeks in a dental hygiene training laboratory. Water samples were collected from three devices (3-way syringes, ultrasonic scalers [US], and cup fillers) immediately after disinfection (baseline) and two weeks later. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were cultured on R2A agar and quantified. QLF technology, specifically QLF-Digital (QLF-D), was employed to measure biofluorescence intensity and contamination levels. Statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis and paired t-tests. Results: Microbial counts met the contamination standards (＜100 CFU/ml) immediately after disinfection but increased significantly after two weeks. Among these devices, the US exhibited the highest contamination and biofluorescence levels, highlighting their vulnerability to microbial growth. The red fluorescence intensity of the microbial pellets also increased significantly over two weeks, correlating with the microbial contamination levels. Conclusion: These findings suggest that although regular disinfection effectively reduces initial contamination, its efficacy diminishes over time, especially for high-risk devices. Furthermore, QLF-D is useful for monitoring microbial growth and biofilm formation, indicating its potential for routine DUWL contamination assessments. Enhanced protocols are recommended to improve the long-term waterline quality for high-risk devices.
Abstract
Background: Dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) are critical components of dental care. However, their small diameter and extended water stagnation time make them prone to microbial contamination and biofilm formation. This study evaluated microbial contamination following routine DUWL disinfection and investigated the applicability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) technology as a device for monitoring changes in biofluorescence within DUWLs. Methods: This study evaluated microbial growth in DUWLs after routine disinfection with hydrogen peroxide every two weeks in a dental hygiene training laboratory. Water samples were collected from three devices (3-way syringes, ultrasonic scalers [US], and cup fillers) immediately after disinfection (baseline) and two weeks later. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were cultured on R2A agar and quantified. QLF technology, specifically QLF-Digital (QLF-D), was employed to measure biofluorescence intensity and contamination levels. Statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis and paired t-tests. Results: Microbial counts met the contamination standards (＜100 CFU/ml) immediately after disinfection but increased significantly after two weeks. Among these devices, the US exhibited the highest contamination and biofluorescence levels, highlighting their vulnerability to microbial growth. The red fluorescence intensity of the microbial pellets also increased significantly over two weeks, correlating with the microbial contamination levels. Conclusion: These findings suggest that although regular disinfection effectively reduces initial contamination, its efficacy diminishes over time, especially for high-risk devices. Furthermore, QLF-D is useful for monitoring microbial growth and biofilm formation, indicating its potential for routine DUWL contamination assessments. Enhanced protocols are recommended to improve the long-term waterline quality for high-risk devices.
참고문헌 (24)
- Pederson ED, "Waterline biofilm and the dental treatment facility : a review", Gen Dent, 50, pp.190~195 (2002)
- Dahlen G, "Biofilms in dental unit water lines", Monogr Oral Sci, 29, pp.12~18 (2021)[DOI]
- Marino F, "First water safety plan approach applied to a Dental Clinic complex : identification of new risk factors associated with Legionella and P. aeruginosa contamination, using a novel sampling, maintenance and management program", J Oral Microbiol, 15, pp.2223477~ (2023)[DOI]
- Suprono MS, "Evaluation of microbial air quality and aerosol distribution in a large dental clinic", Am J Dent, 35, pp.268~272 (2022)
- Holliday R, "Evaluating contaminated dental aerosol and splatter in an open plan clinic environment : implications for the COVID-19 pandemic", J Dent, 105, pp.103565~ (2021)[DOI]
- Kohn WG, "Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings--2003", J Am Dent Assoc, 135, pp.33~47 (2004)[DOI]
- Puttaiah R, "Evaluation of an automated dental unit water system’s contamination control protocol", J Contemp Dent Pract, 13, pp.1~10 (2012)
- Panagakos FS, "Dental unit waterlines:review and product evaluation", J N J Dent Assoc, 72, pp.20~25 (2001)
- Smith AJ, "A cross sectional study of water quality from dental unit water lines in dental practices in the West of Scotland", Br Dent J, 193, pp.645~648 (2002)[DOI]
- Lin SM, "Effects of hydrogen peroxide on dental unit biofilms and treatment water contamination", Eur J Dent, 5, pp.47~59 (2011)
- "Drinking water quality process test standards" (2024)[URL]
- Karpay RI, "Comparison of methods to enumerate bacteria in dental unit water lines", Curr Microbiol, 38, pp.132~134 (1999)[DOI]
- Castellano Realpe OJ, "Dental unit waterlines in Quito and Caracas contaminated with nontuberculous mycobacteria : a potential health risk in dental practice", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17, pp.2348~ (2020)[DOI]
- "Dental infection control standard policy & procedure" (2020)[URL]
- Skolimowski M, "Microfluidic dissolved oxygen gradient generator biochip as a useful tool in bacterial biofilm studies", Lab Chip, 10, pp.2162~2169 (2010)[DOI]
- Lee JH, "Microfluidic devices for studying growth and detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms", Biomed Microdevices, 10, pp.489~498 (2008)[DOI]
- Park A, "Effect of shear stress on the formation of bacterial biofilm in a microfluidic channel", BioChip J, 5, pp.236~241 (2011)[DOI]
- Bahar O, "Assessing adhesion, biofilm formation and motility of Acidovorax citrulli using microfluidic flow chambers", FEMS Microbiol Lett, 312, pp.33~39 (2010)[DOI]
- Walker JT, "Microbial biofilm formation in DUWS and their control using disinfectants", J Dent, 35, pp.721~730 (2007)[DOI]
- Dang Y, "Assessment of microbiota diversity in dental unit waterline contamination", PeerJ, 10, pp.e12723~ (2022)[DOI]
- "Dental unit waterlines" (2024)[URL]
- Yoon HY, "Bacterial contamination of dental unit water systems in a student clinical simulation laboratory of college of dentistry", J Dent Hyg Sci, 15, pp.232~237 (2015)[DOI]
- Barbeau J, "Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units", Appl Environ Microbiol, 62, pp.3954~3959 (1996)[DOI]
- Bridier A, "Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants : a review", Biofouling, 27, pp.1017~1032 (2011)[DOI]