본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Efficacy of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients who exhibit suboptimal responses to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to resistance to nucleoside analogues (SATIS study)

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: It remains to be determined whether switching from adefovir (ADV) to tenofovir (TDF) provides better virological outcomes in patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV plus nucleoside analogue (ADV+NA) therapy for NA-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this prospective trial, patients who showed partial responses (defined as serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA >60 IU/mL) to ADV+NA therapy for NA resistance were randomly allocated to receive TDF plus NA (TDF+NA group, n=16) or to continue their current therapy (ADV+NA group, n=16). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete virological response (CVR, defined as serum HBV DNA <60 IU/mL) at 48 weeks. Results: The median age was 52 years (16 men), and 28 were positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The proportion with CVR was significantly higher in the TDF+NA group than in the ADV+NA group at 24 weeks (81.3% vs. 25.0%, P=0.001) and 48 weeks (87.5% vs. 37.5%, P=0.002). Furthermore, a decrease in the serum HBV DNA level of >2log10 IU/mL was more likely in the TDF+NA group at both 24 and 48 weeks (68.8% vs. 56.3%, P=0.014 vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%, P=0.001, respectively). During the follow-up, the rate of HBeAg seroconversion was higher in the TDF+NA group than the ADV+NA group (12.5% vs. 6.25%, P=0.640), as was that for the hepatitis B surface antigen (6.25% vs. 0%, P=0.080). No serious adverse events due to antiviral agents occurred. Conclusions: In patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV+NA therapy for NA-resistant CHB, switching from ADV to TDF might provide better virological outcomes. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22:443-449)

Abstract

Background/Aims: It remains to be determined whether switching from adefovir (ADV) to tenofovir (TDF) provides better virological outcomes in patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV plus nucleoside analogue (ADV+NA) therapy for NA-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: In this prospective trial, patients who showed partial responses (defined as serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA >60 IU/mL) to ADV+NA therapy for NA resistance were randomly allocated to receive TDF plus NA (TDF+NA group, n=16) or to continue their current therapy (ADV+NA group, n=16). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete virological response (CVR, defined as serum HBV DNA <60 IU/mL) at 48 weeks. Results: The median age was 52 years (16 men), and 28 were positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The proportion with CVR was significantly higher in the TDF+NA group than in the ADV+NA group at 24 weeks (81.3% vs. 25.0%, P=0.001) and 48 weeks (87.5% vs. 37.5%, P=0.002). Furthermore, a decrease in the serum HBV DNA level of >2log10 IU/mL was more likely in the TDF+NA group at both 24 and 48 weeks (68.8% vs. 56.3%, P=0.014 vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%, P=0.001, respectively). During the follow-up, the rate of HBeAg seroconversion was higher in the TDF+NA group than the ADV+NA group (12.5% vs. 6.25%, P=0.640), as was that for the hepatitis B surface antigen (6.25% vs. 0%, P=0.080). No serious adverse events due to antiviral agents occurred. Conclusions: In patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV+NA therapy for NA-resistant CHB, switching from ADV to TDF might provide better virological outcomes. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22:443-449)

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Ganem D, "Hepatitis B virus infection--natural history and clinical consequences", N Engl J Med, 350, pp.1118~1129 (2004)
  2. Chen CJ, "Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level", JAMA, 295, pp.65~73 (2006)
  3. Iloeje UH, "Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.678~686 (2006)
  4. You CR, "Update on hepatitis B virus infection", World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.13293~13305 (2014)
  5. Liaw YF, "Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease", N Engl J Med, 351, pp.1521~1531 (2004)
  6. Lok AS, "Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B", Gastroenterology, 125, pp.1714~1722 (2003)
  7. Lai CL, "Prevalence and clinical correlates of YMDD variants during lamivudine therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B", Clin Infect Dis, 36, pp.687~696 (2003)
  8. Lai CL, "Telbivudine versus lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B", N Engl J Med, 357, pp.2576~2588 (2007)
  9. Lai CL, "A 1-year trial of telbivudine, lamivudine, and the combination in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B", Gastroenterology, 129, pp.528~536 (2005)
  10. Gwak GY, "A comparison of clevudine and entecavir for treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B: results after 2 years of treatment", Hepatol Int, 7, pp.106~110 (2013)
  11. Perrillo R, "Adefovir dipivoxil added to ongoing lamivudine in chronic hepatitis B with YMDD mutant hepatitis B virus", Gastroenterology, 126, pp.81~90 (2004)
  12. 이현석, "라미부딘 내성 만성 B형 간염 환자에서 라미부딘과 아데포비어 병용치료", 대한내과학회지, 77(6), pp.716~722 (2009), 대한내과학회
  13. Kim SB, "Outcome of adefovir add-on lamivudine rescue therapy of up to 5 years in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 31, pp.241~247 (2016)
  14. Pol S, "First-line treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir or tenofovir in ‘real-life’ settings: from clinical trials to clinical practice", J Viral Hepat, 19, pp.377~386 (2012)
  15. van Bömmel F, "Long-term efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy for hepatitis B virus-monoinfected patients after failure of nucleoside", nucleotide analogues, 2010, pp.51, 73~80
  16. European Association For The Study Of The Liver, "EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection", J Hepatol, 57, pp.167~185 (2012)
  17. Cho HJ, "Tenofovirbased rescue therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal responses to adefovir with prior lamivudine resistance", J Med Virol, 87, pp.1532~1538 (2015)
  18. Yang DH, "Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is superior to lamivudine plus adefovir in lamivudine- resistant chronic hepatitis B patients", World J Gastroenterol, 21, pp.2746~2753 (2015)
  19. Liaw YF, "Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2012 update", Hepatol Int, 6, pp.531~561 (2012)
  20. Lok AS, "Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009", Hepatology, 50, pp.661~662 (2009)
  21. Marcellin P, "Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B", N Engl J Med, 359, pp.2442~2455 (2008)
  22. Lee JM, "Longterm adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy for up to 5 years in lamivudineresistant chronic hepatitis B", Antivir Ther, 15, pp.235~241 (2010)
  23. Ryu HJ, "Efficacy of adefovir add-on lamivudine rescue therapy compared with switching to entecavir monotherapy in patients with lamivudineresistant chronic hepatitis B", J Med Virol, 82, pp.1835~1842 (2010)
  24. Ghany MG, "Antiviral resistance and hepatitis B therapy", Hepatology, 49(5 Suppl), pp.S174~S184 (2009)
  25. Locarnini S., "Molecular virology and the development of resistant mutants: implications for therapy", Semin Liver Dis, 25(Suppl 1), pp.9~19 (2005)
  26. Si Hyun Bae, "Hepatitis B Virus Genotype C Prevails Among Chronic Carriers of the Virus in Korea", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 20(5), pp.816~820 (2005), 대한의학회
  27. Yuen MF, "Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Evolution over two decades", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 26(Suppl 1), pp.138~143 (2011)
  28. Lampertico P, "Adefovir rapidly suppresses hepatitis B in HBeAg-negative patients developing genotypic resistance to lamivudine", Hepatology, 42, pp.1414~1419 (2005)
  29. Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, "KASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B", Clin Mol Hepatol, 18, pp.109~162 (2012)
  30. Lee YB, "Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir plus lamivudine or telbivudine combination therapy in treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B", Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 59, pp.972~978 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Entecavir+tenofovir vs. lamivudine/telbivudine+adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with prior suboptimal response김동준, Chang Wook Kim, Hyun Young Woo, In Hee Kim, Jae Young Jang, Jeong Heo, Jun Yong Park, Sang Hoon Ahn, Si Hyun Bae, Won Young Tak대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2020 · 제26권 제3호Entecavir plus tenofovir versus entecavir plus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with a suboptimal response to lamivudine and adefovir combination therapy박수영, 박정길대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2015 · 제21권 제3호Tenofovir has inferior efficacy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients compared to nucleos(t)idenaïve patients김윤준, 김휘영, 유수종, 유정주, 윤정환, 이동현, 이민종, 이정훈, 정고은, 조유리, 조은주, Fabien Zoulim대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2017 · 제23권 제1호The efficacy of Tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to Entecavir-Adefovr combination therapy고순영, 권소영, 김균환, 김정한, 안성현, 최원혁대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2016 · 제22권 제2호Efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients with resistance to lamivudine and entecavir김형래, 노진희, 박능화, 신정우, 안재성, 양유진, 이재호, 전희정, 정석원대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2017 · 제23권 제3호Comparison of tenofovir plus lamivudine versus tenofovir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B박능화, 박용태, 박찬호, 배미애, 신정우, 이윤임, 정석원, 정화식대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2016 · 제22권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)