Comparison of tenofovir plus lamivudine versus tenofovir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) exhibits similar antiviral efficacy against treatment-naïve and lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, there are few clinical reports on the antiviral effects of TDF–LAM combination therapy compared to TDF monotherapy in patients with LAM-resistant CHB. Methods: We investigated the antiviral efficacy of TDF monotherapy vs. TDF–LAM combination therapy in 103 patients with LAM-resistant CHB. Results: The study subjects were treated with TDF alone (n=40) or TDF–LAM combination therapy (n=63) for ≥6 months. The patients had previously been treated with TDF-based rescue therapy for a median of 30.0 months (range, 8–36 months). A virologic response (VR) was achieved in 99 patients (96.1%): 95.0% (38/40) of patients in the TDF monotherapy group and 96.8% (61/63) of patients in the TDF–LAM combination therapy group. The VR rates were not significantly different between the TDF monotherapy and TDF–LAM combination therapy groups (88.9 vs. 87.3% at month 12, and 94.4 vs. 93.7% at month 24, log-rank P=0.652). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that none of the pretreatment factors were significantly associated with VR. Conclusions: TDF monotherapy was as effective as TDF–LAM combination therapy for maintaining viral suppression in the vast majority of patients with LAM-resistant CHB, which suggests that TDF add-on therapy with LAM is unnecessary
Abstract
Background/Aims: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) exhibits similar antiviral efficacy against treatment-naïve and lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, there are few clinical reports on the antiviral effects of TDF–LAM combination therapy compared to TDF monotherapy in patients with LAM-resistant CHB. Methods: We investigated the antiviral efficacy of TDF monotherapy vs. TDF–LAM combination therapy in 103 patients with LAM-resistant CHB. Results: The study subjects were treated with TDF alone (n=40) or TDF–LAM combination therapy (n=63) for ≥6 months. The patients had previously been treated with TDF-based rescue therapy for a median of 30.0 months (range, 8–36 months). A virologic response (VR) was achieved in 99 patients (96.1%): 95.0% (38/40) of patients in the TDF monotherapy group and 96.8% (61/63) of patients in the TDF–LAM combination therapy group. The VR rates were not significantly different between the TDF monotherapy and TDF–LAM combination therapy groups (88.9 vs. 87.3% at month 12, and 94.4 vs. 93.7% at month 24, log-rank P=0.652). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that none of the pretreatment factors were significantly associated with VR. Conclusions: TDF monotherapy was as effective as TDF–LAM combination therapy for maintaining viral suppression in the vast majority of patients with LAM-resistant CHB, which suggests that TDF add-on therapy with LAM is unnecessary
참고문헌 (34)
- Evans AA, "Chronic HBV infection outside treatment guidelines: is treatment needed?", Antivir Ther, 18, pp.229~235 (2013)
- Chen CJ, "Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level", JAMA, 295, pp.65~73 (2006)
- Iloeje UH, "Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.678~686 (2006)
- Hosaka T, "Long-term entecavir treatment reduces hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with hepatitis B virus infection", Hepatology, 58, pp.98~107 (2013)
- Lai CL, "Prevention of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma with antiviral therapy", Hepatology, 57, pp.399~408 (2013)
- Chang TT, "Long-term entecavir therapy results in the reversal of fibrosis", cirrhosis and continued histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B, 2010, pp.52, 886~893
- Marcellin P, "Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study", Lancet, 381, pp.468~475 (2013)
- Liaw YF, "Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease", N Engl J Med, 351, pp.1521~1531 (2004)
- Lok AS, "Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B", Gastroenterology, 125, pp.1714~1722 (2003)
- Yuen MF, "Factors associated with hepatitis B virus DNA breakthrough in patients receiving prolonged lamivudine therapy", Hepatology, 34, pp.785~791 (2001)
- Lee YS, "Increased risk of adefovir resistance in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy", Hepatology, 43, pp.1385~1391 (2006)
- Yim HJ, "Evolution of multi-drug resistant hepatitis B virus during sequential therapy", Hepatology, 44, pp.703~712 (2006)
- Liu Y, "Evolution and suppression of HBV strains with multidrug resistance to lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir in a patient with chronic hepatitis B", Antivir Ther, 15, pp.1185~1190 (2010)
- Lok AS, "Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009", Hepatology, 50, pp.661~662 (2009)
- "EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection", J Hepatol, 57, pp.167~185 (2012)
- Kitrinos KM, "No detectable resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate after 6 years of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B", Hepatology, 59, pp.434~442 (2014)
- Delaney WE 4th, "Intracellular metabolism and in vitro activity of tenofovir against hepatitis B virus", Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 50, pp.2471~2477 (2006)
- Hann HW, "Tenofovir (TDF) has stronger antiviral effect than adefovir (ADV) against lamivudine (LAM)-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV)", Hepatol Int, 2, pp.244~249 (2008)
- Kuo A, "Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2, pp.266~272 (2004)
- van Bömmel F, "Long-term efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy for hepatitis B virus-monoinfected patients after failure of nucleoside", nucleotide analogues, 2010, pp.51, 73~80
- van Bömmel F, "Comparison of adefovir and tenofovir in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus infection", Hepatology, 40, pp.1421~1425 (2004)
- Berg T, "Tenofovir is effective alone or with emtricitabine in adefovir-treated patients with chronic-hepatitis B virus infection", Gastroenterology, 139, pp.1207~1217 (2010)
- Berg T, "Longterm efficacy and safety of emtricitabine plus tenofovir DF vs. tenofovir DF monotherapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients", J Hepatol, 60, pp.715~722 (2014)
- Patterson SJ, "Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate rescue therapy following failure of both lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil in chronic hepatitis B", Gut, 60, pp.247~254 (2011)
- Fung S, "Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine- resistant chronic hepatitis B", Gastroenterology, 146, pp.980~988 (2014)
- Zoutendijk R, "Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: adaptation is not needed for the majority of naive patients with a partial virological response", Hepatology, 54, pp.443~451 (2011)
- Yuen MF, "Three years of continuous entecavir therapy in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients: VIRAL suppression, viral resistance, and clinical safety", Am J Gastroenterol, 106, pp.1264~1271 (2011)
- Ono A, "Long-term continuous entecavir therapy in nucleos(t)ide-naive chronic hepatitis B patients", J Hepatol, 57, pp.508~514 (2012)
- Shin JW, "Prediction of response to entecavir therapy in patients with HBeAgpositive chronic hepatitis B based on on-treatment HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels", J Viral Hepat, 19, pp.724~731 (2012)
- Gordon SC, "Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at 240 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B with high baseline viral load", Hepatology, 58, pp.505~513 (2013)
- Pol S, "First-line treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir or tenofovir in ‘real-life’ settings: from clinical trials to clinical practice", J Viral Hepat, 19, pp.377~386 (2012)
- Hongthanakorn C, "Virological breakthrough and resistance in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues in clinical practice", Hepatology, 53, pp.1854~1863 (2011)
- Lok AS, "Efficacy of entecavir with or without tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B", Gastroenterology, 143, pp.619~628, e1 (2012)
- Chotiyaputta W, "Adherence to nucleos(t)ide analogues for chronic hepatitis B in clinical practice and correlation with virological breakthroughs", J Viral Hepat, 19, pp.205~212 (2012)
