본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The usefulness of transient elastography, acoustic-radiation- force impulse elastography, and real-time elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: Several noninvasive methods have recently been developed for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. The accuracy of transient elastography (TE), acoustic-radiation-force impulse (ARFI) elastography, and real-time elastography (RTE) in predicting liver fibrosis were evaluated. Methods: Seventy-four patients who had undergone a liver biopsy within the previous 6 months were submitted to evaluation with TE, ARFI, and RTE on the same day. Results: There were significant correlations between fibrosis stage and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using the three tested methods: TE, r2=0.272, P=0.0002; ARFI, r2=0.225, P=0.0017; and RTE, r2=0.228, P=0.0015. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥F2, Metavir stage) by TE, ARFI, RTE, TE/platelet count (PLT), velocity of shear wave (Vs)/PLT, and elasticity score (Es)/PLT were 0.727, 0.715,0.507, 0.876, 0.874, and 0.811, respectively. The AUROC for the diagnosis of cirrhosis by TE, ARFI, RTE, TE/PLT, Vs/PLT,and Es/PLT were 0.786, 0.807, 0.767, 0.836, 0.819, and 0.838, respectively. Comparisons of AUROC between all LSMs for predicting significant fibrosis (≥F2) produced the following results: TE vs. RTE, P=0.0069; ARFI vs. RTE, P=0.0277; and TE vs. ARFI, P=0.8836. Applying PLT, the ability of each LSM to predict fibrosis stage significantly increased: TE/PLT vs. TE, P=0.0004; Vs/PLT vs. ARFI, P=0.0022; and Es/PLT vs. RTE, P<0.0001. However, the ability to predict cirrhosis was not enhanced, combining LSM and PLT. Conclusions: TE and ARFI may be better methods for predicting significant liver fibrosis than RTE. This predictive ability increased significantly when accounting for platelet count. However, all of the measures had comparable efficacies for predicting cirrhosis. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2013;19:156-164)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Several noninvasive methods have recently been developed for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. The accuracy of transient elastography (TE), acoustic-radiation-force impulse (ARFI) elastography, and real-time elastography (RTE) in predicting liver fibrosis were evaluated. Methods: Seventy-four patients who had undergone a liver biopsy within the previous 6 months were submitted to evaluation with TE, ARFI, and RTE on the same day. Results: There were significant correlations between fibrosis stage and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using the three tested methods: TE, r2=0.272, P=0.0002; ARFI, r2=0.225, P=0.0017; and RTE, r2=0.228, P=0.0015. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥F2, Metavir stage) by TE, ARFI, RTE, TE/platelet count (PLT), velocity of shear wave (Vs)/PLT, and elasticity score (Es)/PLT were 0.727, 0.715,0.507, 0.876, 0.874, and 0.811, respectively. The AUROC for the diagnosis of cirrhosis by TE, ARFI, RTE, TE/PLT, Vs/PLT,and Es/PLT were 0.786, 0.807, 0.767, 0.836, 0.819, and 0.838, respectively. Comparisons of AUROC between all LSMs for predicting significant fibrosis (≥F2) produced the following results: TE vs. RTE, P=0.0069; ARFI vs. RTE, P=0.0277; and TE vs. ARFI, P=0.8836. Applying PLT, the ability of each LSM to predict fibrosis stage significantly increased: TE/PLT vs. TE, P=0.0004; Vs/PLT vs. ARFI, P=0.0022; and Es/PLT vs. RTE, P<0.0001. However, the ability to predict cirrhosis was not enhanced, combining LSM and PLT. Conclusions: TE and ARFI may be better methods for predicting significant liver fibrosis than RTE. This predictive ability increased significantly when accounting for platelet count. However, all of the measures had comparable efficacies for predicting cirrhosis. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2013;19:156-164)

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Mazzaferro V, "Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis", N Engl J Med, 334, pp.693~699 (1996)
  2. National Institutes of Health, "NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002", NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002;19:1-46, ~ (2002)
  3. Bravo AA, "Liver biopsy", N Engl J Med, 344, pp.495~500 (2001)
  4. Cadranel JF, "Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF)", Hepatology, 32, pp.477~481 (2000)
  5. Castera L, "Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy", Hepatology, 30, pp.1529~1530 (1999)
  6. Bedossa P, "Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C", Hepatology, 38, pp.1449~1457 (2003)
  7. Bedossa P, "Observer variation in assessment of liver biopsies of alcoholic patients", Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 12, pp.173~178 (1988)
  8. Maharaj B, "Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver", Lancet, 1, pp.523~525 (1986)
  9. Regev A, "Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.2614~2618 (2002)
  10. Rockey DC, "Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension with transient elastography", Gastroenterology, 134, pp.8~14 (2008)
  11. Talwalkar JA, "Ultrasound- based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, pp.1214~1220 (2007)
  12. Sporea I, "Liver stiffnes evaluated through transient elastography in patients chronicaly infected with HBV", J Hepatol, 58(Suppl 1), pp.S143~S144 (2009)
  13. Friedrich-Rust M, "Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography", Radiology, 252, pp.595~604 (2009)
  14. Sporea I, "Transient elastography (FibroScan®) as compared to real-time elastography (Siemens) in patients with chronic hepatopathies", Gastroenterology, 136, pp.A-327~ (2009)
  15. Sporea I, "How Relevant is real-time elastography (Siemens), for the evaluation of liver stiffness?", Ultrasound Med Biol, 35(Suppl), pp.S53~ (2009)
  16. Lupsor M, "Performance of a new elastographic method (ARFI technology) compared to unidimensional transient elastography in the noninvasive assessment of chronic hepatitis C. Preliminary results", J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 18, pp.303~310 (2009)
  17. Friedrich-Rust M, "Real-time elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 188, pp.758~764 (2007)
  18. Tatsumi C, "Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using serum fibrotic markers, transient elastography (FibroScan) and real-time tissue elastography", Intervirology, 51(Suppl 1), pp.27~33 (2008)
  19. Havre RF, "Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra- and interobserver validations", Ultrasound Med Biol, 34, pp.1638~1650 (2008)
  20. Fujimoto K, "Non-invasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in patients wiht chronic hepatitis C using elastography", Medix, (Suppl), pp.24~27 (2007)
  21. Popescu A, "Assessment of liver fibrosis by real time sonoelastography (Hitachi) as compared to liver biopsy and transient elastography", Ultrasound Med Biol, 35(Suppl), pp.S152~ (2009)
  22. Song C, "The usefulness of Vs", plt: a new marker of liver fibrosis, 2011, pp.54(Suppl 1), S133~S134
  23. Sandrin L, "Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis", Ultrasound Med Biol, 29, pp.1705~1713 (2003)
  24. Bedossa P, "An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group", Hepatology, 24, pp.289~293 (1996)
  25. Desmet VJ, "Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging", Hepatology, 19, pp.1513~1520 (1994)
  26. Fraquelli M, "Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography: what is hidden behind misleading results", Hepatology, 46, pp.282~283 (2007)
  27. Friedrich-Rust M, "Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis", Gastroenterology, 134, pp.960~974 (2008)
  28. Wong VW, "Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease", Hepatology, 51, pp.454~462 (2010)
  29. Palmeri ML, "Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using acoustic radiation force-based shear stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease", J Hepatol, 55, pp.666~672 (2011)
  30. Huwart L, "Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis", Gastroenterology, 135, pp.32~40 (2008)
  31. Sporea I, "Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography as compared to transient elastography and liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatopathies", Ultraschall Med, 32(Suppl 1), pp.S46~S52 (2011)
  32. Goertz RS, "Measurement of liver elasticity with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology: an alternative noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis", Ultraschall Med, 31, pp.151~155 (2010)
  33. Fahey BJ, "Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the abdomen: demonstration of feasibility and utility", Ultrasound Med Biol, 31, pp.1185~1198 (2005)
  34. Nightingale K, "Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility", Ultrasound Med Biol, 28, pp.227~235 (2002)
  35. Haque M, "Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) to liver biopsy histologic scores in the evaluation of chronic liver disease: A pilot study", Ann Hepatol, 9, pp.289~293 (2010)
  36. Kim JE, "Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for chronic liver disease: comparison with ultrasound-based scores of experienced radiologists, Child-Pugh scores and liver function tests", Ultrasound Med Biol, 36, pp.1637~1643 (2010)
  37. Horster S, "Comparing acoustic radiation force impulse imaging to transient elastography to assess liver stiffness in healthy volunteers with and without valsalva manoeuvre", Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 46, pp.159~168 (2010)
  38. Yoneda M, "Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: US-based acoustic radiation force impulse elastography", Radiology, 256, pp.640~647 (2010)
  39. Boursier J, "Acoustic radiation force impulse: a new ultrasonographic technology for the widespread noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 22, pp.1074~1084 (2010)
  40. Gallotti A, "Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) technique in ultrasound with Virtual Touch tissue quantification of the upper abdomen", Radiol Med, 115, pp.889~897 (2010)
  41. Friedrich-Rust M, "Real-time tissue elastography versus FibroScan for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease", Ultraschall Med, 30, pp.478~484 (2009)
  42. Kanamoto M, "Real time elastography for noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 16, pp.463~467 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease: a prospective cohort study김영석, 유정주, 정승원, Boo Sung Kim, Hae Won Yoo, Jae Young Jang, Sang Gyune Kim대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2022 · 제37권 제2호Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B조몽, 권영오, 김도영, 김범경, 김선욱, 김승업, 박미성, 박수영, 박준용, 안상훈, 윤기태, 탁원영, 한광협거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제2호Ultrasonographic scoring system score versus liver stiffness measurement in prediction of cirrhosis권상옥, 김가은, 김문영, 김정민, 김현아, 문경민, 박홍준, 백순구, 신승용, 엄영우, 조미연, 최은희대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2013 · 제19권 제4호Combination of Transient Elastography and an Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test to Assess the Degree of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B김도영, 김범경, 김승업, 박준용, 안상훈, 한광협, Hyon-Suk Kim, Ja Yoon Heo, Kijun Song, Young Nyun Park거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2018 · 제12권 제2호Transient elastography versus hepatic venous pressure gradient for diagnosing portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis김가은, 김문영, 백순구대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2017 · 제23권 제1호Combi-Elastography versus Transient Elastography for Assessing the Histological Severity of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease소영호, Chang Mee Soo, Jang Heejoon, Jang Siwon, Joo Sae Kyung, Kim Won, Lee Dong Ho, Lee Dong Hyeon, Lee Yun Kyu, Park Jeong Hwan거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2024 · 제18권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Noninvasive predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in Korean patients with histologically proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease장정원, 김상균, 정승원, 김희경, 이창돈, 송명준, 이영석, 정은선, 배시현, 채희복, 김영석, 허원희, 김창욱, 조세현, 최종영, 최상욱, 윤승규, 양진모pp. 120-130Predictive factors that influence the survival rates in liver cirrhosis patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitisJin Nam Kim, 김유선, Soo Hyung Ryu, Jeong Seop Moon, Pei Chuan Tsung, In Hye Cha, Hee Won Chopp. 131-139The influence of waist circumference on insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in apparently healthy Korean adults이지영, 최영길, 김병익, 조용균, 박동일, 임서형, 김홍주, 박정호, 손정일, 주덕윤, 전우규, 유수현, 신동석pp. 140-147Advanced fibrosis is not a negative pretreatment predictive factor for genotype 2 or 3 chronic hepatitis C patients박현우, 이현석, 택원영, 양해민, 이유림, 박수영, 강은정, 권영오pp. 148-155Efficacy and safety of entecavir plus carnitine complex (GODEXⓇ) compared to entecavir monotherapy in patient with ALT elevated chronic hepatitis B: randomized, multicenter open-label trials. The GOAL study임영석, 김태엽, 서주현, 조용균, 김병익, 허정, 최종영, 김원, 김휘영, 김석현, 이병석, 한상영, 정용진, 황성규, 이영상, 정재윤, 조성원, 권영오, 백용한, 박수영, 김자경, 배시현, 백양현, 전대원, 이관식, 김홍주, 우현영, 임규성pp. 165-172