본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어판 말기신부전 환자의 치료순응도 측정 도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 검증

Validation of the Korean Version of the End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류간호학

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test psychometric properties the Korean version of the End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (KESRD-AQ). The ESRD-AQ, a 46-item, multidimensional,self-administrated questionnaire which was developed to assess treatment adherence to hemodialysis (HD)attendance, medications, fluid restrictions, and diet prescription among patients on maintenance hemodialysis,has been validated. Methods: The KESRD-AQ was developed by performing both translation and backtranslation. The content validity and test- retest reliability of the KESRD-AQ were evaluated by establishing item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was assessed by adopting a known-group analysis comparing adheres and non-adherers using Mann-Whitney U Test. Results: 41 Korean-American patients with ESRD on HD from 3 outpatient dialysis centers in California participated in the study. The KESRD-AQ showed excellent content validity (average I-CVI=.96)and test-retest reliability (ICC=.917, p=.004). The construct validity indicated that the KESRD-AQ distinguished adheres and non-adheres (p=.02~.047). Conclusion: The KESRD-AQ is a valid and reliable instrument to measure treatment adherence.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test psychometric properties the Korean version of the End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (KESRD-AQ). The ESRD-AQ, a 46-item, multidimensional,self-administrated questionnaire which was developed to assess treatment adherence to hemodialysis (HD)attendance, medications, fluid restrictions, and diet prescription among patients on maintenance hemodialysis,has been validated. Methods: The KESRD-AQ was developed by performing both translation and backtranslation. The content validity and test- retest reliability of the KESRD-AQ were evaluated by establishing item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was assessed by adopting a known-group analysis comparing adheres and non-adherers using Mann-Whitney U Test. Results: 41 Korean-American patients with ESRD on HD from 3 outpatient dialysis centers in California participated in the study. The KESRD-AQ showed excellent content validity (average I-CVI=.96)and test-retest reliability (ICC=.917, p=.004). The construct validity indicated that the KESRD-AQ distinguished adheres and non-adheres (p=.02~.047). Conclusion: The KESRD-AQ is a valid and reliable instrument to measure treatment adherence.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. "우리나라 신대체요법의 현황" (2010)[URL]
  2. 민혜숙, "혈액투석 환자의 치료지시 이행정도와 생리적 지표와의 관계", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 36(1), pp.64~73 (2006), 한국간호과학회
  3. 박지숙, "혈액투석 환자의 지식과 교육 요구도, 자가-관리 방침 순응과의 일치도 및 자가-관리 방침 순응의 영향 요인 분석", 재활간호학회지, 14(1), pp.39~46 (2011), 한국재활간호학회
  4. 이수진, "개별교육프로그램이 역할불이행 혈액투석환자의 투석관련 지식, 이행 및 생리적 지표에 미치는 효과", 임상간호연구, 15(3), pp.5~16 (2009), 병원간호사회
  5. 이준노, "장기간 혈액투석을 받는 말기 신부전환자의 정서상태 및 투석 순응도에 대한 연구", 신경정신의학, 34(4), pp.1059~1069 (1995)
  6. 장미영, "혈액투석 환자의 자기효능감, 건강관련 강인성과 이행과의 관계", 석사, pp.1996
  7. 최은영, "혈액투석 환자의 피로 예측모형", 박사, pp.2005
  8. 홍계영, "혈액투석환자의 투석관련지식, 자기효능감과 환자역할행위 이행과의 관계 연구", 석사, pp.1999
  9. Chiu, Y. W., "Pill burden, adherence, hyperphosphatemia, and quality of life in maintenance dialysis patients", Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 4(6), pp.1089~1096 (2009)
  10. Denhaerynck, K., "Prevalence and consequences of nonadherence to hemodialysis regimens", American Journal of Critical Care, 16(3), pp.222~235 (2007)
  11. Durose, C. L., "Knowledge of dietary restrictions and the medicalconsequences of noncompliance by patients on hemodialysisare not predictive of dietary compliance", Journalof the American Dietetic Association, 104(1), pp.35~41 (2004)
  12. Faul, F., "G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences", Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), pp.175~191 (2007)
  13. Hecking, E., "Haemodialysis prescription, adherence and nutritional indicators in five European countries: Results from the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS)", Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 19(1), pp.100~107 (2004)
  14. Kim, Y., "The end-stage renal disease adherence questionnaire (ESRD-AQ): Testing the psychometric properties in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis", Nephrology Nursing Journal, 37(4), pp.377~393 (2010)
  15. Kugler, C., "Nonadherence with diet and fluid restrictions among adults having hemodialysis", Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(1), pp.25~29 (2005)
  16. Leggat, J. E., "Noncompliance in hemodialysis: Predictors and survival analysis", American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 32(1), pp.139~145 (1998)
  17. Loghman-Adham, M., "Medication noncompliance in patients with chronic disease: Issues in dialysis and renal transplantation", The American Journal of Managed Care, 9(2), pp.155~171 (2003)
  18. Lynn, M. R., "Determination and quantification of content validity", Nursing Research, 35(6), pp.382~385 (1986)
  19. Morgan, L., "A decade review: Methods to improve adherence to the treatment regimen among hemodialysis patients", Nephrology Nursing Journal, 27(3), pp.299~304 (2000)
  20. Polit, D. F., "Essentials of nursing research: methods, appraisal, and utilization (6th ed.)" (2006), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  21. Polit, D. F., "The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations", Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), pp.489~497 (2006)
  22. Polit, D. F., "Focus on research methods. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations", Research in Nursing and Health, 30(4), pp.459~467 (2007)
  23. Rosenthal Asher, D., "Depression and nonadherence predict mortality in hemodialysis treated end-stage renal disease patients", Hemodialysis International (2012)[DOI]
  24. Saran, R., "Nonadherence in hemodialysis: Associations with mortality, hospitalization, and practice patterns in the DOPPS", Kidney International, 64(1), pp.254~262 (2003)
  25. Schilling, L. S., "Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel", Nursing Research, 56(5), pp.361~366 (2007)
  26. Szczech, L. A., "Interactions between dialysis-related volume exposures, nutritional surrogates and mortality among ESRD patients", Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 18(8), pp.1585~1591 (2003)
  27. "2011 annual data report" (2011)[URL]
  28. Vlaminck, H., "The dialysis diet and fluid non-adherence questionnaire:Validity testing of a self-report instrument forclinical practice", Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10(5), pp.707~715 (2001)
  29. Yen, M., "Examining test-retest reliability: An intra-class correlation approach", Nursing research, 51(1), pp.59~62 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)