본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Research Trends on the Integrative Efforts in Technology Education: Reviews of the Relevant Journals

박경숙|이효녕|권혁수
사범대학부속중등교육연구소 (Secondary Education Institute)|2009.04|중등교육연구 (SECONDARY EDUCATION RESEARCH)|제57권 제1호|pp. 245-274|DOI 10.25152/ser.2009.57.1.245

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

연구동향통합교육research trendsintegrated education기술교육STEM 교육technology educationstem educationtechnological design기술적인 설계
주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the research being conducted by those in the field of technology education in an attempt to guide future research into efforts to integrate technology, science, and mathematics education. A mixed methods design was used to analyze four major journals of technology education. Three stages of preparation, quantitative review, and qualitative review were performed. In the preparation stage, the researchers identified four major journals in the technology education field and selected forty journal articles. Using a content analysis table, three researchers reviewed the forty journal articles and completed both quantitative and qualitative reviews. The findings in the quantitative review stage were presented based on three categories of integration type, research methodology, and research data sources. Based on these findings, four research topics were discussed in the qualitative review stage. Historically, technology education has had a strong philosophical foundation and extensive experience in implementing integrative curricula or courses. In the literature surveyed, these efforts were presented as “science and technology" and “science, technology, and math", as balanced research methods, and as the data sources “students' perspectives" and “literature". For more efficient integration among science, technology, and mathematics, active collaborative research and practice are both needed. Also, a meta- analytic review of the integrative efforts of other disciplines(science education and mathematics education) should be performed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the research being conducted by those in the field of technology education in an attempt to guide future research into efforts to integrate technology, science, and mathematics education. A mixed methods design was used to analyze four major journals of technology education. Three stages of preparation, quantitative review, and qualitative review were performed. In the preparation stage, the researchers identified four major journals in the technology education field and selected forty journal articles. Using a content analysis table, three researchers reviewed the forty journal articles and completed both quantitative and qualitative reviews. The findings in the quantitative review stage were presented based on three categories of integration type, research methodology, and research data sources. Based on these findings, four research topics were discussed in the qualitative review stage. Historically, technology education has had a strong philosophical foundation and extensive experience in implementing integrative curricula or courses. In the literature surveyed, these efforts were presented as “science and technology" and “science, technology, and math", as balanced research methods, and as the data sources “students' perspectives" and “literature". For more efficient integration among science, technology, and mathematics, active collaborative research and practice are both needed. Also, a meta- analytic review of the integrative efforts of other disciplines(science education and mathematics education) should be performed.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Science for all Americans" (1989), Oxford University Press
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for science literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
  3. Ankiewicz, P, "Some implications of the philosophy of technology for Science, Technology and Society(STS)", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(2), pp.117~141 (2006)
  4. Chatoney,M, "The evolution of knowledge objects at the primary school: A study of the material concepts as it is taught in France. International", Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(2), pp.143~161 (2006)
  5. Childress,V, "Does integrating technology, science and mathematics improve technological problem solving? A quasi-experiment", Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), pp.16~26 (1996)
  6. Daugherty, J, "Research in engineering and technology education: The current status", Paper presented at the 94th Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference (2007)
  7. Daugherty, M. K, "Mathematics, science, and technology teachers' perception of technology education", Journal of Technology Education, 4(2), pp.28~43 (1993)
  8. Davis,D, "Pragmatism, pedagogy, and philosophy: A model of thought and action in primary technology and science education", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), pp.207~221 (2003)
  9. De Vries,M.J, "Technology education: Beyond the “technology is applied science" paradigm", Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), pp.7~15 (1996)
  10. De Vries,M.J, "Science, technology and society: A methodological perspective", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1), pp.21~32 (1997)
  11. Doppelt, Y, "Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context", Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), pp.22~39 (2008)
  12. Doppelt,Y, "Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), pp.55~65 (2009)
  13. Dugger, J, "A comparison of principles of technology and high school physics student achievement using a principles of technology achievement test", Journal of Technology Education, 4(1), pp.19~26 (1992)
  14. Dugger, J, "A comparison of second-year principles of technology and high school physics student achievement using a principles of technology achievement test", Journal of Technology Education, 5(2), pp.5~14 (1994)
  15. Dyer, R, "Investigating the relationship between high school technology education and test scores for algebra I and geometry", Journal of Technology Education, 17(2), pp.7~17 (2006)
  16. Fleer,M, "The science of technology: Young children working technologically", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(3), pp.269~291 (1999)
  17. Foster,P, "Must we MST?", Journal of Technology Education, 6(1), pp.76~84 (1994)
  18. Foster,W.T, "A research agenda for technology education", The Technology Teacher, 56(1), pp.31~33 (1996)
  19. Gardner,P.L, "The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical reflections", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(2), pp.123~153 (1994)
  20. Gardner,P.L, "The roots of technology and science: A philosophical and historical view", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1), pp.13~20 (1997)
  21. Hoepfl,M.C, "Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers", Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), pp.47~63 (1997)
  22. Hoepfl,M.C, "Research in technology education: Identifying a strategic agenda", Paper presented at the 94th Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference (2007)
  23. Householder, D. L, "Technology: Its influence in the secondary school upon achievement in academic subjects and upon students' attitude toward technology", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 3(2), pp.5~18 (1993)
  24. Hutchinson,P, "Children designing & engineering: Contextual learning units in primary design and technology", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.122~145 (2002)
  25. International Technology Education Association, "Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology", Author, ~ (2000)
  26. Johnson, B, "Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches" (2008), Sage
  27. Kolodner,L.J, "Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.9~40 (2002)
  28. 권혁수, "Motivation Issues in the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Meta-Analytic Approach", 중등교육연구, 56(3), pp.125~148 (2008), 중등교육연구소
  29. LaPorte, J. E, "Integrating technology, science, and mathematics in the middle school", The Technology Teacher, 52(6), pp.17~21 (1993)
  30. Liu,X, "Elementary school students' logical reasoning on rolling", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), pp.3~20 (2000)
  31. Loepp,F.L, "Models of curriculum integration", Journal of Technology Studies, 25(2), pp.21~25 (1999)
  32. Loepp,F.L, "Standards: Mathematics and science compared to technological literacy", Journal of Technology Studies, 30(1), pp.2~10 (2004)
  33. Lovedahl,G.G, "Technology education's role in the new national science standards", Journal of Technology Studies, 27(1), pp.28~32 (2001)
  34. Merrill,C, "Integrated technology, mathematics, and science education: A quasi-experiment", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 38(3), pp.45~61 (2001)
  35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics", Author, ~ (2000)
  36. National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
  37. Norton,S.J, "The use of design practice to teach mathematics and science", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(1), pp.19~44 (2008)
  38. Pannabecker,J.R, "Integrating technology, science, and math at Napoleon' school for industry, 1806-1815", Journal of Technology Education, 14(1), pp.51~64 (2002)
  39. Parkinson,E, "Scientific and technological literacy through Techno Science2000+: An approach for in-service and pre-service training", Journal of Technology Studies, 29(1), pp.26~33 (2003)
  40. Parkinson,E, "Practical modeling and hypothesis testing in primary design and technology education", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), pp.233~251 (2007)
  41. Pedretti, E, "Science, technology and engineering: Building lifelong bridges", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5(3), pp.267~278 (1995)
  42. Petrina,S, "The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the Journal of Technology Education", Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), pp.27~57 (1998)
  43. Pollock,M.J, "Introduction of CAA into a mathematics course for technology students to address a change in curriculum requirements", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), pp.249~270 (2002)
  44. Rose,M.A, "Perception of technological literacy among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics leaders", Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), pp.35~52 (2007)
  45. Rossman, G, "Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research" (2003), Sage Publications
  46. Roth,W, "Learning to talk engineering design: Results from an interpretive study in a grade 4", 5 classroom, 1996, pp.6(2), 107~135
  47. Rowell, P. W, "Characterization of technology within an elementary science program", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), pp.37~56 (1999)
  48. Sanders, M, "A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs", Paper presented at the 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference (2006)
  49. Sanders,M, "STEM, STEM education, STEM mania", Technology Teacher, 68(4), pp.20~26 (2009)
  50. Satchwell, R. E, "Designing and implementing an integrated mathematics, science, and technology curriculum for the middle school", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.41~66 (2002)
  51. Savage, E, "A conceptual framework for technology education" (1990), International Technology Education Association
  52. Scarborough, S. R, "PHYS-MA-TECH: An integrated partnership", Journal of Technology Education, 5(2), pp.31~39 (1994)
  53. Wender,I, "Relation of technology, science, self-concept, interest, and gender", Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3), pp.43~51 (2004)
  54. Whittaker,G, "Materials science and technology: What do the students say?", Journal of Technology Education, 5(2), pp.52~67 (1994)
  55. Wicklein, R. C, "Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science, and technology education", Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), pp.59~76 (1995)
  56. Wild,P, "Physics or Technology? Technology or Physics? An experiment in curriculum development", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1(3), pp.171~175 (1990)
  57. Wilson, J, "Science, technology and mathematics adult literacy project", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 6(2), pp.173~175 (1996)
  58. Zubrowski,B, "Integrating science into design technology projects: Using a standard model in the design process", Journal of Technology Education, 13, pp.47~65 (2002)
  59. Zuga,K.F, "Implementing technology education: A review and synthesis of the research literature" (1994), Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education

관련 논문AI추천

Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education: Contemporary Trends and Issues권혁수, 박경숙, 이효녕, Mark Sanders사범대학부속중등교육연구소 · 중등교육연구2011 · 제59권 제3호융합교육(STEAM) 연구 동향 분석: 수학 교과를 중심으로신동조영남수학회 · East Asian Mathematical Journal2023 · 제39권 제4호국내 초･중등 공학 교육 연구 동향 분석이은상한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2015 · 제18권 제4호Engineering Design: A Facilitator for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics [STEM] Education권혁수, 박경숙과학교육연구소 · 과학교육연구지2009 · 제33권 제2호Analysis on the Theoretical Models Related to the Integration of Science and Mathematics Education: Focus on Four Exemplary Models이효녕한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2011 · 제31권 제3호Motivation Issues in the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Meta-Analytic Approach권혁수, 이효녕사범대학부속중등교육연구소 · 중등교육연구2008 · 제56권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

부모-자녀 관계 사회적 자본과 교육포부 수준과의 관계: 초등학생을 중심으로안우환pp. 1-20지구과학의 YX 그래프 해석을 위한 학습 모듈의 효과김종희, 김주화pp. 21-42학습자의 생활공간에 근거한 프로젝트 학습의 설계와 적용권정희, 조철기pp. 43-66장편소설의 교과서 수용 방안 연구: 최인훈의 <광장>을 예로 들어이종섭pp. 67-88영재들의 메타인지와 자기주도적 학습능력 간의 관계: 자기결정성 학습동기의 매개효과이재신, 이지혜pp. 89-114
원문 보기