본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

“저자의 죽음”: 저자, 역사, 그리고 주체(성)

“The Death of the Author”: Author, History and Agency

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In spite of its long-lasting critical influence upon literary theory, the notion of “the death of the author” offered by pioneering Roland Barthes and Michel Foucault has been challenged by many scholars during the last fifty years or so. As Seán Burke has pointed out, in truth, “the principle of the author most powerfully reasserts itself when it is thought absent” (7), which makes it difficult for any critic to take up the topic freshly today, charged as it is with contemporary controversies upon politics and power involved in the institution of literature itself. Coming back to classical texts and re-open the topic, however, this study aims to look afresh into the question of why the “author” still matters, not only in literary theories but also in critical practices. The classical texts of Barthes and Foucault are the starting point for the discussion, through which the study attemps to (re)locate the missing link to fill the space that “the death of the author” has left void, and further connect it to the current critical invocation of the “return of the author.” Examining Marxist and Feminist critics such as Terry Eagleton, Nancy Miller, and Cheryl Walker, who have illuminated both historical significance and ahistorical failure of “the death of the author,” the study further looks into how and why today’s historical reality still demands a sense of history and agency in the notion of the “author” as Lynne Tillman as an author and a critic/reader calls for in her discussion of the writing and reading experience. Less theoretical and more personal as it is, Tillman’s configuration of the writing and reading self sheds light on the significant role of agency, albeit tactical and practical in its critical function, in the notion of the “author” since it links the author and the reader as historically and sometimes personally engaged producers of the meanings in ways that make them accountable to the historical moment.

Abstract

In spite of its long-lasting critical influence upon literary theory, the notion of “the death of the author” offered by pioneering Roland Barthes and Michel Foucault has been challenged by many scholars during the last fifty years or so. As Seán Burke has pointed out, in truth, “the principle of the author most powerfully reasserts itself when it is thought absent” (7), which makes it difficult for any critic to take up the topic freshly today, charged as it is with contemporary controversies upon politics and power involved in the institution of literature itself. Coming back to classical texts and re-open the topic, however, this study aims to look afresh into the question of why the “author” still matters, not only in literary theories but also in critical practices. The classical texts of Barthes and Foucault are the starting point for the discussion, through which the study attemps to (re)locate the missing link to fill the space that “the death of the author” has left void, and further connect it to the current critical invocation of the “return of the author.” Examining Marxist and Feminist critics such as Terry Eagleton, Nancy Miller, and Cheryl Walker, who have illuminated both historical significance and ahistorical failure of “the death of the author,” the study further looks into how and why today’s historical reality still demands a sense of history and agency in the notion of the “author” as Lynne Tillman as an author and a critic/reader calls for in her discussion of the writing and reading experience. Less theoretical and more personal as it is, Tillman’s configuration of the writing and reading self sheds light on the significant role of agency, albeit tactical and practical in its critical function, in the notion of the “author” since it links the author and the reader as historically and sometimes personally engaged producers of the meanings in ways that make them accountable to the historical moment.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Barthes, Roland., "Image-Music-Text" (1977), Noonday
  2. Barthes, Roland., "Prepartion of the Novel" (2011), Columbia UP
  3. Bennet, Tonny., "Formalism and Marxism" (1989), Rotledge
  4. Burke, Seán., "The Death and Return of the Author" (1998), Edinburgh UP
  5. Chatman, Seymour., "Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film" (1990), Cornell UP
  6. Craig, Carys J., "Reconstructing the Author Self: Some Feminist Lessons for Copyright Law", Journal of Gender, Social Ploicy & The Law, 15(2), pp.201~266 (2007)
  7. Craig, Carys J., "Copyright, Communication and Culture" (2011), Edward Elgar Publishing Co
  8. de Certeau, Michel., "The Practice of Everyday Life" (1984), U of California P
  9. Derrida, Jacque., "Of Grammatology" (1976), The Johns Hopkins UP
  10. Eagleton, Terry., "Criticism and Ideology" (1976), Verso
  11. Eagleton, Terry., "Marxism and Literary Criticism" (1976), U of California P
  12. Eagleton, Terry., "Myth of Powers : A Marxist Study of Brontës" (1975), Macmillan
  13. Ede, Lisa, "Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship.", PMLA, 116(2), pp.354~369 (2001)
  14. Enos, Theresa., "Reports of the ‘Author’s Death’ May Be Greatly Exaggerated But the ‘Writer’ Lives on in the Text", Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 20(4), pp.339~346 (1990)
  15. Foucault, Michel., "Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews" (1980), Cornell UP
  16. Hix, Harvey., "Morte D'Author: An Autopsy", The Iowa Review, 17(1), pp.131~150 (1987)
  17. Nehamas, Alexander., "The Death and Resurrection of the Author?", pp.95~115 (2002), Greenwood Press
  18. Lanser, Susan S., "(Im)plying the Author", Narrative, 9(2), pp.153~160 (2001)
  19. Leach, James., "CODE: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy", pp.29~44 (2005), MIT Press
  20. Critical Studies, "Feminist Studies", pp.1986, Miller, Nancy K.
  21. Pease, Donald., "Critical Terms for Literary Study", pp.105~117 (1990), U of Chicago P
  22. Shi, Sampsung Xiaoxiang, "Knowledge Policy for the 21st Century: A Legal Perspective", pp.291~312 (2010), Irwin Law
  23. Stopford, John., "The Death of the Author (as Producer)", Philosophy & Rhetoric, 23(2), pp.184~191 (1990)
  24. Tillman, Lynne., "Critical Fictions: The Politics of Imaginative Writing", pp.97~111 (1991), Bay Press
  25. Trimbur, John., "Agency and the Death of the Author: A Partial Defense of Modernism", JAC (Journal of Rhetoric, Culture, and Politics), 20(2), pp.283~298 (2000)
  26. Walker, Cheryl., "Feminist Literary Criticism and the Author", Critical Inquiry, 16(3), pp.552~571 (1990)
  27. Weimann, Robert., "Text, Author-Function, and Appropriation in Modern Narrative: Toward a Sociology of Representation", Critical Inquiry, 14(3), pp.431~447 (1988)
  28. Wilson, Adrian., "Foucault on the ‘Question of the Author’: A Critical Exegesis", The Modern Language Review, 99(2), pp.339~363 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)