본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Exploratory Non-Inferiority Validation of an East Asian-Based MRI Brain Volumetric Software

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류방사선과학

초록

Purpose: Accurate measurement of brain volume using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease. This study aimed to clinically validate a new MRI-based brain volumetric software (the study software) against a widely used and validated reference software. Materials and Methods: Patients with cognitive impairment who underwent three-dimensional structural brain MRI between January and December 2021 were retrospectively included. The software’s performance in detecting significant medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), along with the correlation between Scheltens’ MTA scores and hippocampal volumes, was assessed using a non-inferiority test and Spearman’s correlation analysis, respectively. MTA scores were determined by consensus among three neuroradiologists. Results: A total of 271 patients (mean age 79 ± 7 years [standard deviation], 178 women) were included. The hippocampal volumes calculated by the two software programs were not equivalent. In detecting significant MTA, the study software demonstrated a non-inferior area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73, 0.84]), accuracy (0.77 [95% CI: 0.72, 0.82]), and specificity (0.89 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.93]) compared to the reference software’s AUC (0.71 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.78]), accuracy (0.72 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.78]), and specificity (0.80 [95% CI: 0.73, 0.85]) (p < 0.05). However, non-inferiority in sensitivity was not established between the study software (0.49 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.61]) and reference software (0.55 [95% CI: 0.44, 0.66]). The correlation between MTA scores and hippocampal volume was significantly stronger in the study software (-0.57 [95% CI: -0.64, -0.48]) than in the reference software (-0.30 [95% CI: -0.41, -0.19]) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The new East Asian cohort-based MRI brain volumetric software demonstrated non-inferiority to the reference software in detecting significant MTA. Furthermore, the new study software showed a greater association with the neuroradiologists’ MTA scores than the reference software.

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate measurement of brain volume using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease. This study aimed to clinically validate a new MRI-based brain volumetric software (the study software) against a widely used and validated reference software. Materials and Methods: Patients with cognitive impairment who underwent three-dimensional structural brain MRI between January and December 2021 were retrospectively included. The software’s performance in detecting significant medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), along with the correlation between Scheltens’ MTA scores and hippocampal volumes, was assessed using a non-inferiority test and Spearman’s correlation analysis, respectively. MTA scores were determined by consensus among three neuroradiologists. Results: A total of 271 patients (mean age 79 ± 7 years [standard deviation], 178 women) were included. The hippocampal volumes calculated by the two software programs were not equivalent. In detecting significant MTA, the study software demonstrated a non-inferior area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73, 0.84]), accuracy (0.77 [95% CI: 0.72, 0.82]), and specificity (0.89 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.93]) compared to the reference software’s AUC (0.71 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.78]), accuracy (0.72 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.78]), and specificity (0.80 [95% CI: 0.73, 0.85]) (p < 0.05). However, non-inferiority in sensitivity was not established between the study software (0.49 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.61]) and reference software (0.55 [95% CI: 0.44, 0.66]). The correlation between MTA scores and hippocampal volume was significantly stronger in the study software (-0.57 [95% CI: -0.64, -0.48]) than in the reference software (-0.30 [95% CI: -0.41, -0.19]) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The new East Asian cohort-based MRI brain volumetric software demonstrated non-inferiority to the reference software in detecting significant MTA. Furthermore, the new study software showed a greater association with the neuroradiologists’ MTA scores than the reference software.

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Vendor-Provided Volumetry Software and NeuroQuant Using 3D T1-Weighted Images in Subjects with Cognitive Impairment: How Large is the Inter-Method Discrepancy?김하영, 문연실, 문원진, Jieun Chung대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2020 · 제24권 제2호Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Subjects Using a Fully Automated Brain Segmentation Software강경미, Chiheon Kwon, Chul-Ho Sohn, Dahyun Yi, Dong Young Lee, Huijin Song, Inpyeong Hwang, Ji-hoon Kim, Ji Ye Lee, Min Soo Byun, Roh-Eul Yoo, Seung Hong Choi, Tae Jin Yun, the KBASE Research Group대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2021 · 제25권 제3호Clinical Utilization of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Software in the Spectrum of Alzheimer’s Disease: Case SeriesDonghyeon Kim, Hye Weon Kim, Hyun Kook Lim, ZunHyan Rieu대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2023 · 제62권 제2호Comparison of Automated Brain Volume Measures by NeuroQuant vs. Freesurfer in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effect of Slice Thicknes문연실, 문원진, 박지은, 오세원, 이지영, 임영희, 전홍준, 정미선연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2021 · 제62권 제3호Evaluation of Reproducibility of Brain Volumetry between Commercial Software, Inbrain and Established Research Purpose Method, FreeSurfer문연실, 문원진, 박지은, 오세원, 이정빈, 이지영, 전홍준, 정미선대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2021 · 제17권 제2호Age-Specific Cutoff Scores on a T1-Weighted Axial Medial Temporal-Lobe Atrophy Visual Rating Scale in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea Data강희진, 공경애, 권은진, 김건하, 김병채, 김상윤, 김승윤, 김은주, 김종헌, 나덕렬, 나해리, 문소영, 박경원, 박기형, 양동원, 윤보라, 윤수진, 윤영철, 이강윤, 이승아, 이재홍, 정지향, 최경선, 최성혜, 최지현, 한설희, 한현정, 황지혜대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2018 · 제14권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)