한국어판 플러턴 어드밴스드 균형 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구
Reliability and Validity Study on the Korean Version of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The assessment tool developed in other countries should be translated into Korean language using rigorous methodological approaches in order to be used in Korea. Because these procedures are insufficient for establishing the cross-cultural and linguistic equivalence, the need for statistical methods is raised. The Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale was translated into Korean and the content validity was verified through the back translation method, but the reliability and validity have not yet been proven by statistical methods. Objects: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (KFAB) by statistical methods in elderly people. Methods: A total of 97 elderly adults (39 males and 58 females) participated in this study. Internal consistency of the KFAB was measured using Cronbach’s alpha and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability between the two measurement sessions. Concurrent validity was measured by comparing the KFAB responses with the Korean version of the Berg Balance Scale (KBBS) using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Construct validity of the KFAB was measured using the exploratory factor analysis to evaluate the unidimensionality of the questionnaire. The significance level was set at α=.05. Results: The internal consistency of the KFAB was found be adequate with Cronbach’s alpha (.96), and test-retest reliability was excellent as evidenced by the high ICC (r=.996). Concurrent validity showed high correlation between the KFAB and KBBS (r=.89, p<.001). Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis. The result from Bartlett test of sphericity was statistically significant (p<.001), and the value of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was .93. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of only one dominant factor that explained 76.43% of the variance. Conclusion: The KFAB is a reliable, valid and appropriate tool for measuring the balance functions in elderly people.
Abstract
Background: The assessment tool developed in other countries should be translated into Korean language using rigorous methodological approaches in order to be used in Korea. Because these procedures are insufficient for establishing the cross-cultural and linguistic equivalence, the need for statistical methods is raised. The Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale was translated into Korean and the content validity was verified through the back translation method, but the reliability and validity have not yet been proven by statistical methods. Objects: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (KFAB) by statistical methods in elderly people. Methods: A total of 97 elderly adults (39 males and 58 females) participated in this study. Internal consistency of the KFAB was measured using Cronbach’s alpha and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability between the two measurement sessions. Concurrent validity was measured by comparing the KFAB responses with the Korean version of the Berg Balance Scale (KBBS) using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Construct validity of the KFAB was measured using the exploratory factor analysis to evaluate the unidimensionality of the questionnaire. The significance level was set at α=.05. Results: The internal consistency of the KFAB was found be adequate with Cronbach’s alpha (.96), and test-retest reliability was excellent as evidenced by the high ICC (r=.996). Concurrent validity showed high correlation between the KFAB and KBBS (r=.89, p<.001). Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis. The result from Bartlett test of sphericity was statistically significant (p<.001), and the value of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was .93. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of only one dominant factor that explained 76.43% of the variance. Conclusion: The KFAB is a reliable, valid and appropriate tool for measuring the balance functions in elderly people.
참고문헌 (23)
- Baker DI, "Dissemination of an evidence-based multicomponent fall risk-assessment and-management strategy throughout a geographic area", J Am Geriatr Soc, 53(4), pp.675~680 (2005)
- Berg KO, "Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73(11), pp.1073~1080 (1992)
- Bogle Thorbahn LD, "Use of the Berg balance test to predict falls in elderly persons", Phys Ther, 76(6), pp.576~583 (1996)
- Boulgarides LK, "Use of clinical and impairment-based tests to predict falls by community-dwelling older adults", Phys Ther, 83(4), pp.328~339 (2003)
- Brauer SG, "A prospective study of laboratory and clinical measures of postural stability to predict community-dwelling fallers", J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 55(8), pp.M469~M476 (2000)
- Duncan PW, "Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance", J Gerontol, 45(6), pp.M192~M197 (1990)
- Richard H. Fortinsky, "Extent of Implementation of Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Practices for Older Patients in Home Health Care", Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(4), pp.737~743 (2008), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
- Hall CD, "Prediction of fall risk reduction as measured by dynamic gait index in individuals with unilateral vestibular hypofunction", Otol Neurotol, 25(5), pp.746~751 (2004)
- Danielle Hernandez, "Predicting Which Older Adults Will or Will Not Fall Using the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(12), pp.2309~2315 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Hulin CL, "Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations", J Appl Psychol, 67(6), pp.818~825 (1982)
- Kaiser HF, "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39(1), pp.31~36 (1974)
- Ahyoung Kim, "Effects of Defferent Types of Practice in Cross-Cultural Test Adaptation of Affective Measures", 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(1), pp.89~113 (2003), 한국심리학회
- 김경모, "Content Validity of a Korean-Translated Version of a Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale: A Pilot Study", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 22(4), pp.51~61 (2015), 한국전문물리치료학회[DOI]
- Seong-Gil Kim, "The effect of increase in baggage weight on elderly women's lower extremity muscle activation during gait", Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 59(3), pp.574~576 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- "Current characteristics of injury among older adults by injury mechanism" (2009)[URL]
- 이정아, "한국판 버그 균형척도 평가도구의 라쉬분석", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 13(3), pp.49~56 (2006), 한국전문물리치료학회
- Legters K, "Fear of falling", Phys Ther, 82(3), pp.264~272 (2002)
- Nevitt MC, "Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls. A prospective study", JAMA, 261(18), pp.2663~2668 (1989)
- 박은영, "GMFM-88과 GMFM-66의 신뢰도와 타당도 비교", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 17(3), pp.40~47 (2010), 한국전문물리치료학회
- Rose DJ, "Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(11), pp.1478~1485 (2006)
- Christian Schlenstedt, "Comparing the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale With the Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale to Assess Postural Control in Patients With Parkinson Disease", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(2), pp.218~225 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 손원숙, "심리검사 번안에 대한 통합적 접근", 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(2), pp.57~80 (2003), 한국심리학회
- Whitney S, "Concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale and the Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular dysfunction", Physiother Res Int, 8(4), pp.178~186 (2003)