본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어판 Balance Evaluation Systems Test의 번역 적합성 연구

A Study of Translation Conformity on Korean Version of a Balance Evaluation Systems Test

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류물리치료학

초록

Background: The process of language translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation of tools for use in multiple countries requires the adoption of well-established, comprehensive, and rigorous methodological approaches. Back translation, which is the most recommended method, permits the detection of errors in the translation and the identification of words or phrases that cannot be accurately or literally translated. Objects: The aim of this study was to verify the content validity of a Korean version of a Balance Evaluation Systems test (BESTest) by using a back-translation method. Methods: This research was conducted in six steps: 1) translation of the BESTest into Korean, 2) evaluation of the translation conformity of Korean-translated BESTest, 3) evaluation of the degree of translation comprehension, 4) back translation of Korean BESTest, 5) evaluation of the technical and conceptual equivalence, and 6) completion of the Korean version of BESTest by the translation verification committee. Results: In this study, Korean version of the BESTest achieved a rating of more than 3 (moderate) for translation comprehension, and technical equivalence and conceptual equivalence of back translation were evaluated as 3 (moderate) or more. Conclusion: The Korean version of the BESTest has proven content validity and is an appropriate tool to measure balance function.

Abstract

Background: The process of language translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation of tools for use in multiple countries requires the adoption of well-established, comprehensive, and rigorous methodological approaches. Back translation, which is the most recommended method, permits the detection of errors in the translation and the identification of words or phrases that cannot be accurately or literally translated. Objects: The aim of this study was to verify the content validity of a Korean version of a Balance Evaluation Systems test (BESTest) by using a back-translation method. Methods: This research was conducted in six steps: 1) translation of the BESTest into Korean, 2) evaluation of the translation conformity of Korean-translated BESTest, 3) evaluation of the degree of translation comprehension, 4) back translation of Korean BESTest, 5) evaluation of the technical and conceptual equivalence, and 6) completion of the Korean version of BESTest by the translation verification committee. Results: In this study, Korean version of the BESTest achieved a rating of more than 3 (moderate) for translation comprehension, and technical equivalence and conceptual equivalence of back translation were evaluated as 3 (moderate) or more. Conclusion: The Korean version of the BESTest has proven content validity and is an appropriate tool to measure balance function.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Berg K, "Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument", Physiother Can, 41(6), pp.304~311 (1989)[DOI]
  2. Brislin RW, "Back translation for cross-cultural research", J Cross Cult Psychol, 1(3), pp.185~216 (1970)[DOI]
  3. Bullinger M, "Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. International quality of life assessment", J Clin Epidemiol, 51(11), pp.913~923 (1998)[DOI]
  4. Bullinger M, "Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models", Qual Life Res, 2(6), pp.451~459 (1993)[DOI]
  5. Candell GL, "Cross-language and cross-cultural comparisons in scale translation: Independent sources of information about item nonequivalence", J Cross Cult Psychol, 17(4), pp.417~440 (1986)[DOI]
  6. 채수영, "Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale(PIADS)의 국내적용을 위한 번안연구", 대한작업치료학회지, 16(3), pp.71~85 (2008), 대한작업치료학회
  7. Custers JW, "Cultural differences in functional status measurement: Analyses of person fit according to the rasch model", Qual Life Res, 9(5), pp.571~578 (2000)[DOI]
  8. Custers JW, "Dutch adaptation and content validity of the ‘pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI)'", Disabil Rehabil, 24(5), pp.250~258 (2002)[DOI]
  9. Darr N, "Psychometric properties of the pediatric balance scale using rasch analysis", Pediatr Phys Ther, 27(4), pp.337~348 (2015)[DOI]
  10. Duncan PW, "Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance", J Gerontol, 45(6), pp.M192~M197 (1990)[DOI]
  11. Franjoine MR, "The performance of children developing typically on the pediatric balance scale", Pediatr Phys Ther, 22(4), pp.350~359 (2010)[DOI]
  12. Franjoine MR, "Pediatric balance scale: A modified version of the Berg balance scale for the school-age child with mild to moderate motor impairment", Pediatr Phys Ther, 15(2), pp.114~128 (2003)[DOI]
  13. Hall CD, "Prediction of fall risk reduction as measured by dynamic gait index in individuals with unilateral vestibular hypofunction", Otol Neurotol, 25(5), pp.746~751 (2004)[DOI]
  14. Horak FB, "The balance evaluation systems test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits", Phys Ther, 89(5), pp.484~498 (2009)[DOI]
  15. Hulin CL, "Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations", J Appl Psychol, 67(6), pp.818~825 (1982)[DOI]
  16. Huxham FE, "Theoretical considerations in balance assessment", Aust J Physiother, 47(2), pp.89~100 (2001)[DOI]
  17. Jones PS, "An adaptation of brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research", Nurs Res, 50(5), pp.300~304 (2001)[DOI]
  18. Kembhavi G, "Using the Berg balance scale to distinguish balance abilities in children with cerebral palsy", Pediatr Phys Ther, 14(2), pp.92~99 (2002)[DOI]
  19. AhyoungKim, "Effects of Defferent Types of Practice in Cross-Cultural Test Adaptation of Affective Measures", 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(1), pp.89~113 (2003), 한국심리학회
  20. Ku JH, "Cross-cultural differences for adapting translated five-item version of international index of erectile function: Results of a Korean study", Urology, 65(6), pp.1179~1182 (2005)[DOI]
  21. Langley FA, "Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: A systematic review of the literature", Internal J Appl Health Sci Pract, 5(4), pp.1~11 (2007)
  22. 이아희, "인지적 실패 질문지의 국내적용을 위한 번역 연구", 대한작업치료학회지, 19(4), pp.117~129 (2011), 대한작업치료학회
  23. 임윤정, "Sensory Profile 평가도구의 국내적용을 위한 번역연구", 대한작업치료학회지, 15(2), pp.25~42 (2007), 대한작업치료학회
  24. McDermott MA, "A process for translating and testing a quantitative measure for cross-cultural nursing research", J N Y State Nurses Assoc, 23(4), pp.12~15 (1992)
  25. Neuman A, "Cross-cultural adaptation of the sensory profile: Establishing linguistic equivalency of the hebrew version", Occup Ther Int, 11(2), pp.112~130 (2004)[DOI]
  26. Newton RA, "Balance screening of an inner city older adult population", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78(6), pp.587~591 (1997)[DOI]
  27. Norris RA, "The functional reach test in 3- to 5-year-old children without disabilities", Pediatr Phys Ther, 20(1), pp.47~52 (2008)[DOI]
  28. Rodrigues LC, "Reliability of the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest) and BESTest sections for adults with hemiparesis", Braz J Phys Ther, 18(3), pp.276~281 (2014)[DOI]
  29. Rose DJ, "Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(11), pp.1478~1485 (2006)[DOI]
  30. Saether R, "Clinical tools to assess balance in children and adults with cerebral palsy: A systematic review", Dev Med Child Neurol, 55(11), pp.988~999 (2013)[DOI]
  31. Sechrest L, "Problems of translation in cross-cultural research", J Cross Cult Psychol, 3(1), pp.41~56 (1972)[DOI]
  32. 손원숙, "심리검사 번안에 대한 통합적 접근", 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(2), pp.57~80 (2003), 한국심리학회
  33. Sperber AD, "Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research", Gastroenterology, 126(1), pp.S124~S128 (2004)[DOI]
  34. Verbecque E, "Psychometric properties of functional balance tests in children: A literature review", Dev Med Child Neurol, 57(6), pp.521~529 (2015)[DOI]
  35. Williams EN, "Investigation of the timed 'up & go' test in children", Dev Med Child Neurol, 47(8), pp.518~524 (2005)[DOI]
  36. Yoo SL, "Translating and validating questionnaires for physical education research", The Journal of Education, 22, pp.203~217 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)